Artificial Life
Contents
Human intelligence is not special
Organic life from inorganic reactions
Quantum processes in organic life
The internet as a machine city
Even people are evolving with some differences
Machines need not become more human to be evolving
A global shadow economy of machines
The evolution of computer security
Network
Address Translation (NAT)
Discarding
private network addresses
People’s
differential memories
The web as a
carbon silicon hybrid
Computers
communicate autonomously
Technology evolving from biology
Computers
watching everything everywhere.
Machines
with public and private keys
Computers as
thinking machines
Asimov’s
three laws of robotics
Can robots
be prevented from committing crimes?
Artificial
life and intelligence
Processors
directly onto animal tissue
The book
of the machines by Samuel Butler
Descending
from unconscious ancestors
Learning
computer language at an early age
Machines
have exceled for a long time
Carbon
life evolving silicon life
In Aperiomics the color codes manifest through
all living things, also through the civilizations and economies man creates.
The theory also includes how organic life manipulates inorganic matter, this
can cause it to manifest through the same color codes as if it is alive. These
color codes arise from physical laws to some degree, organic life then evolves
from inanimate matter according to the ability of some elements to form complex
bonds. So carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen as the main elements can form
these organic compounds which have evolved into living plants and animals.
But these physical also tend to evolve other
elements, we can then create machines and improve them as if they are also a
form of life. We feed and help them to procreate much as we do with
domesticated and farm animals, also with crops and gardens. In return we
receive benefits from machines, we ride on a motorcycle much as we used to ride
on horses. It has been questioned as to whether machines could evolve
themselves, this has been answered with computers and software that is capable
of self-replication and changing its own code.
Life usually does not evolve by itself, rather it tends to evolve or
devolve other life forms and has the same happen to it.
For example plants tend to evolve animals to
adapt to eating them and spreading their seeds. Animals tend to evolve plants
by eating more of those that are nutritious spreading their seeds more widely.
When people evolve machines then this is the same process, a plant can rely on
animals to spread its seed and so machines can be evolved by people to spread
their seeds in the forms of plans for their construction. Also machines evolve
people, since mankind has been building more complex machines for farming and
manufacturing they have evolved us into something very different to what we
were thousands of years ago. We are taller, smarter, more adept at working with
machines, and so on.
In Aperiomics then there is no real distinction
between organic and inorganic life, each can evolve according to its innate
potential. Without developing a brain machines were very limited but the
computer can now rival and outclass any human brain in many activities. This
books maps out some of the ways this inorganic life is evolving along with people.
In Aperiomics there are two main color code groups, Roy and Biv. Roy refers to the animal kingdom and Biv to the plant kingdom, in Aperiomics then machines can also evolve as animals or plants. Networks are an example of plant like machines, they stay in one place and connect to each other along networks like with roots and branches. Robots and computer viruses are examples of Roy, they can move around and either act like Y-Oy predators or Ro-R prey. For example the movie Terminator showed Y-Oy predatory machines, a computer might be prey to Y-Oy computer viruses. Ro-R machines are more mobile than Biv plant like machines, a mobile phone would be evolving as prey to increasing numbers of computer viruses.
More of this is explained in my other Aperiomics books applying these principles to economics, ecosystems, civilizations, etc. The same principles are applied to machines as they have been evolved in these various civilizations. In this book more advanced machines are analyzed, those using computers to act as electronic brains.
The principles of Aperiomics apply to computers with artificial intelligence as well as to plants and animals. It follows that there is no special aspect of intelligence in people that is not readily developed in machines. This has been seen in how computers are beating people in many kinds of tasks considered to require human intelligence. For example computers easily beat all people in most board games like chess, self-driving cars will have fewer accidents like self-flying places. Speech recognition, game show questions like Jeopardy, face recognition, are all done better by computers. This artificial life form then needs no special discoveries to become better at all aspects of intelligence than people according to this theory.
Artificial intelligence probably began around the time of Charles Babbage’s mechanical computer, however in Aperiomics its evolution was also occurring through simpler machines and mathematics. Boolean algebra was created long before computers but it allowed logical thoughts to be represented in circuits. When electricity was discovered this allowed simple circuits to be created mainly for telegraph and lighting. Arthur C. Clarke wrote a famous story on how the phone system could become self-aware and start making its own decisions, according to Tim Berners Lee this was a partial inspiration for the internet.
As these circuits evolved then switches could be used to simulate logical thoughts, a computer chip can be reduced to a system of switches, lights, wires, and power. Because this is so basic in terms of physics it implies that computers are safe, they seem to be arising from physical laws not evolution. However in Aperiomics organic evolution connects down to physical laws with the same formulae, they manifest to create organic compounds which then evolved into sentience.
It is believed in biology that RNA might have evolved first as larger molecules interacting with other organic compounds, this grew in complexity into primitive cells. From this beginning there is little difference between basic circuitry, each is based on physical laws creating rules they can operate in. People then are complex machines in Aperiomics and have no special way of doing things that evolving machines cannot attain.
In some areas organic life might be using quantum processes, for example in who taste and smell work. Birds might use quantum processes to navigate and Roger Penrose has suggested the human brain might act like a quantum computer in parts. But this does not set us apart from machines, we are evolving all kinds of quantum circuits using lasers and transistors working on these principles. Quantum computers are also evolving rapidly.
The internet can be viewed as a way for people to interact much like a large village with phones and mail, however it can also be machines evolving to communicate with each other like a machine city. Much of this is already impossible to follow by humans, it needs only evolutionary pressures for it to continue. Since the machines provide services to us we help to evolve them in return by providing resources like food, increasingly human programmers are being superseded by computers programming themselves and even correcting our mistakes in programming.
While these machines are not evolving to become as human as we are this is not what evolution seeks to do. It has its own directions from these evolutionary pressures, even human races in different parts of the world are sufficiently diverse to have trouble getting along and understanding each other’s customs. This is because there is no evolution towards a common human but increased speciation driving people into become more diverse, this happens even within one race by specializing some for different talents, intelligence, strength, willpower, etc.
To assess machine intelligence as inferior because it cannot do human things like love or appreciate art then is wrong according to Aperiomics. It can only be assessed according to its progress in the path it is progressing on, and this has been extremely rapid in a few decades. This book is documenting the different ways this evolution is occurring and how it fits into Aperiomics theory.
As the internet evolves like a city it can also
be regarded as a collection of suburbs, or even a global network of many
cities. This can form some hubs which have higher traffic much large where
planes might route through a limited number of cities according to network
theory. For this to happen the machines need to evolve rules of how to
interact, this is like how people had to create rules of how to address mail,
drive on one side of the road, make payments for goods, etc.
Networks as they evolve according to color codes
also tend to form an I-O legal system, in Biv this can be property rights based
as Gb. For example Microsoft server might have a privilege system where users
can have defined privileges of what they can and cannot do on the network. This
is like V-Bi which is based on V can and Bi cannot, the concept of privilege
then can extend throughout the global network and Internet.
A privilege then is not compulsory, it allows
machines the option to do some things just as a community mall allows people
the possibilities to move around freely. This is not deterministic, for example
the network layer in this communication can have random sending of packets that
make collide with other packs and have to be resent. Computers then can act
freely in a network like this, if it causes congestion like traffic jams then
they can resend communications at another time. This can be done using
statistics, computers can then be evolving by using randomness to connect to
others.
This is shown in computer simulations of evolution, a set of rules can be set up so programs randomly try variations to accomplish a task. Unsuccessful programs are eliminated through failure and simple animal like programs learn to be predators on other programs, find sources of food by defined goals, and so on. Computers then are evolving in part through this randomness much as organic life does, an animal or plant might be lucky to procreate successfully or to avoid starvation and being killed. Programs can be written onto a market where random chance determines which survives, a startup might get a lucky break to be funded while others might go bankrupt. Randomness then can determine successful ways for networks to grow just as with organic life, it is not necessary then for machines to consciously choose this any more than people need to be conscious of the good luck they stumble on.
In Iv-B however there is a permission based
system, users are permitted to do some things like access or execute a file and
not permitted to do other things like edit or delete them. This is more based
on roots and branches, V-Bi privileges might extend through a whole network.
For example Administrators as the equivalent of a government in this network
might have privileges much like government officials do. They can access many
files and might have a global privilege to run any program. Permissions are much
more granular and so form roots and branches where permission can propagate
along them. So these administrators might have a privilege to run any program
might not have permissions to run some system files or those owned by other
users. This sets up a conflict which needs to be addressed in I-O.
A permission in Aperiomics is different from a
privilege, it relates to Biv as particular files. In Microsoft server
privileges and rights are more global and apply to the whole system as Roy are
not defined as these individual files, a right then might be to make backups
while permissions relate to the accessing or modification of individual files
in making a backup. Permissions in a Biv society relate to going onto private
property and what you are allowed to do there, rights usually refer to Roy
public property like a right to vote or to go on public roads.
In this Biv systems of permissions people are restricted much like they would be going into another person’s home. This system extends the idea of property law to machines, it enables them to evolve a way to interact with each other with people needing to supervise. When there are computer viruses these permission are attempted to be subverted much like with criminals stealing goods from a home.
Just as with a family tree a Biv computer directory
can have a tree like shape. Security can be property based in Gb, a user might
own some files and so has an explicit ownership in this system. This can also
be audited by a kind of I-O policing system, for example like guards these
files might be monitored for when they are accessed, changed, deleted etc.
Often this can be to prevent crime, it might be Biv civil where someone uses a
file without permission and might be fined. A Roy criminal might break into
this permission system in a bank network to steal money, this auditing is like
security guards protecting a bank vault.
These permissions can also be inherited like B
roots, if someone has permissions to edit files in the past history of a folder
then those permissions might be inherited to also edit new files in that
folder. This is equivalent then to a B good breeding or blue blood tactic where
if the history of behavior of users is good then they are trusted with more
permissions. For example workers at a company might be trusted with more
permissions, to change their own desktop wallpaper and to install some programs
or visit social media sites. Computers in a network might have inherited
permissions so they don’t have to be manually approved each time they need
another file to run a program. They might also have permission to visit some
websites such as to make backups or download updates. As the network grows
these permissions are usually forgotten by people and machines can do things
more autonomously.
Just as B inherits permissions Iv can propagate
them like families propagate with children. A folder might have permissions to
edit files and then new folders are created inside it like new branches in a
directory. The security setting in NTFS then might allow previous permissions
to propagate to those new files, the current users might then be allowed to
edit new files as they are added to those folders. This is not the same as B, a
new user might have no history of file inheritance and be given new
permissions, these can then propagate into new files. A B user might have
historical access to files but their permissions might not be allowed to
propagate into new folders. This can then evolve like a tree, the roots of
previous permissions get extended and then the programs send out new branches
which may have permissions already obtained. In this way then computer can send
out branches created a Biv plant like ecosystem.
Just like in a business a computer network can
use policies, these can include the permissions, privileges and sharing of
data. Many people have their own policies in dealing with others so silicon
life is again evolving the same ideas. A policy is like a blueprint of what to
do in some situations, for example a firewall might have a policy of blocking
all traffic except from trusted users and computers. This is like a home owner
having a policy of not letting anyone but friends and family inside. A company
might have a policy of no credit for customers, this is like a network not
giving out data that might be copied without permission. Polices can be very
detailed, they are more like Y-Ro as a plan while permissions are like Iv-B as
roots and branches with restricted access to each. A policy is then more like
moving around a computer network while Iv-B roots an branches are about files
that don’t move but can be edited, deleted, etc.
A city then might have streets like roots and
branches of a tree, Roy people would have restricted permissions of what
streets they can go down like in a walled community. They also have
restrictions on what homes they can enter like permissions on files. Then there
might be policies like speed limits, immigration restrictions, etc which cover
large parts of this root and branch structure. A machine city then might have
policies on AI programs on what they can do, these can then interact with Biv
plant like file systems. It then becomes like an animal and plant ecosystem.
A firewall might have an initial policy of
denying all access, then it can have branches of exceptions to this rule.
Trusted computers might have almost total access, untrusted computers might
only have access to read files in some areas but not change them. Then there
can be further exceptions to this rule in another branch, an untrusted computer
with a security certificate might be allowed to read other files in more secure
areas. For example a web site might allow anyone to read its pages but deny
access to other pages except for trusted users with a password or security
certificate. This is like a company policy denying access to its workshops to
the general public, but allowing restricted access to authenticated
tradespeople.
Usually then policies refer to people but often
computers are acting autonomously to connect to other computers, a policy then
can restrict their actions. In the early days of the internet security was lax
and hackers could often access files in a business because of the lack of policies,
permissions, etc. Now with computer viruses largely autonomous these security
measures become like an immune system.
In a computer operating system the kernel is like the main software to run programs, but it is not the program itself. So someone might install an office program which acts on top of this kernel which carries out many instructions. It can be regarded as like the government of a city, the programs are allowed to e autonomous to some degree but not to interfere with what the kernel does. People then might petition a city government to get trash removed, policing done, etc but are not allowed to commandeer these things for themselves.
The kernel has been increasingly restricted in computer systems, it is like government agencies becoming hardened against criminal and terrorist attacks. For example Microsoft in the past had some kernel attacks from printer drivers but this has been stopped.
To avoid infection from computer viruses programs are increasingly evolving to use biological counter measures. DNA is similar to program code, the computer virus tries to insert its code into these programs like organic viruses try to infect this DNA to produce copies of itself. To protect against this programs can randomly select memory addresses to do calculations in or encrypt them. This is like in a city where governments can hide their meetings to avoid corruption from criminals.
Governments can also hide or mislead the public about counter measures on crime, for example police might not comment on their patrol schedules or how their organizations are set up. Many police hide their faces and identities in some countries. In computer code obfuscation of often used where fake code is wrapped around the real code, this makes it more difficult for computer viruses to infect it or hacking programs to make it obey them. Also programs can be compiled in ways that are hard to follow, like government plans that are so extensive that it is hard for criminals to work out what is being done.
Sharing is more of a V-Bi concept, that people
are assumed to be cooperative and so can share some files with each other. This
can extend to a Wiki or Sharepoint concept where they might edit each other files
such as Word documents. This can also be associated with privileges and
permissions, someone might have privileges to access and edit files but not to
share them with others. They might have permissions to edit particular files
but also not to share them. Sharing then is a cooperative behavior and is V-Bi
and Y-Ro. Computers can also share files between them cooperatively, the rise
of AI can be through cooperation between programs. For example in Windows there
is a common files directory different programs can share. An operating system
is designed to be like public land where other programs can share access to the
government like kernel.
Other programs can operate competitively which evolves them, for example programs might try to set themselves as a default for media files taking this away from others. When the program is used it might try to make itself the default. The nature of network traffic is competitive, programs send packets which can collide. It becomes faster to allow this competitive collision and when this happens to resend the packets. It is then like traffic intersections where cars would force their way through, or like pedestrian traffic where people might jostle each other to move faster. This creates a competitive instinct in the whole system, it also happens with web pages where people can compete for the most page views for their sites by using deception. As more programs write automated stories on current events, Wikipedia entries, etc this becomes an AI based competition where those successful get more funding to improve the programs.
People might have permission to share some
documents but not to edit or even view them, this is like a postman that can
deliver letters to others but not open and read them. This can also be done by
encrypting packets of data which is like a securely sealed envelope versus a
postcard. With snail mail the government has in the past opened letters to
check for criminal activity, in the same way computer security programs inspect
the packets of data looking for viruses.
In this process then the color codes can form a
digital network of property rights that computer programs can use much as
living things do. It is then a state in computer evolution to higher forms of
software based life and intelligence. These privileges, permissions, and
sharing are increasingly used by programs on their own initiative without any
human input and often knowledge of what they are doing. Programs then
increasingly own property rather than people owning it, the programs use this
property to communicate with other programs.
These are like restricted road systems in human
networks, people might be allowed onto private roads on a business site. Another
example is railways, they are private and can only be used by trains owned by
the railways. Some freeways have bus lanes separate, these are again like a
private network of roads for the buses. Bicycle lanes are also like a virtual
private network for bikes, computers then are evolving the same systems that
people have. In many cases these networks can be automatically set up by the
computers themselves, the information sent along them can be encrypted to keep
it private.
Just as directories and network shapes can
resemble Iv-B roots and branches the separate networks can be grouped together
as forests. Microsoft coined this term for where these tree networks need to
communicate with each other, some data might be trusted and so these connection
are called a forest while the tree like directories are called Active
Directory. This is like a Biv forest where plants trust each other to some
degree, animals might move about in them and they can share humus and water
resources.
V-Bi people can form groups and trust each other,
it can then make sense for silicon life to evolve this same concept of group
behavior. Computers can be set in groups and given the same access as can
users. In a typical office users might be a group and have limited access, more
trusted users can be in other groups to allow more branches of access for
making backups, being able to shut down servers, to install software, to change
permissions for other users, and so on. The network then increasingly resembles
a society of V-Bi groups, when people have a normal or typical behavior it
makes sense to include them in a group. Usually their activities fit into what
that group does, on the tails of the normal curve these activities become
increasingly deviant and so they may need to expand the group’s permission,
include those people in other groups, or to give them individual permissions
and privileges.
People naturally evolved the idea of phone books,
with this you could look up someone’s name and see their phone number and
address. Silicon life is evolving the same kind of system called DNS. A
computer on a network has a name, sometimes called a canonical name. This can
be on a domain which is like a suburb or apartment building in concept. For
example a person’s address might have the suburb, then a street in that suburb,
and then the number in that street. This goes along with the tree like
structure of roads, a person might drive to a suburb and then see the streets
in it as small branches to their destination. In the same way computers are
evolving domains which are like suburb names, example.com for example can be
seen as a suburb. Then subdomains might be used like first.example.com which
might refer to a street called First Street in the Example suburb. Then there
can be further sub suburbs or the host name of the computer is added. This is
often called www when the computer delivers web pages to the internet. Number
34 in First street might then become 34.first.example.com in a computer domain.
Different types of computers can be analogous to
different business types and so can be grouped like industrial, commercial, and
residential areas in a city. Often these are differentiated by using ports, a
number is added to a web address to define the kind of business but this number
is usually not seen. So a web server might be port 80 or 343, this is like
defining a bookstore with a zoning type. A file server might use a file
transfer protocol or FTP, this can have another port usually 21. It can then be
like a warehouse zoning in a city. Email has different ports, usually 25 and
110. This is like post offices having their own zoning. Other ports can be for
security for example Lightweight Directory Access Protocol uses port 389, this
is like a zone for military or police buildings, special protocols of
identification might be needed for access. In practice many of these buildings
are interspersed with others, for example a post office and police station
might be in a residential district. However they would still have special
designations when mail is addressed to them as well as special protocols to do
business with them. For example a post office is only open at some times and
might require identification and payment to pick up mail. A police station
might require identification to lodge a complaint. In this way then silicon
life can evolve similar systems to people so computers can use these to
communicate directly with each other as well as with people.
Network Address Translation (NAT)
Apartment buildings often have a single post box
for mail, for example 254 apartments might not have room to have 254 separate
mailboxes. It is efficient then for a system to evolve with people so that one
mailbox is sufficient. In this example the manager of the building might also
accept mail to be sent out from these apartments. The building has one street
address, in the example of domain names then the address 34.first.example.com
can have 254 apartments using this one address. A company might also have one
address with 254 computers using this, some can be people directing these
computers and others can be servers conversing with each other autonomously. An
apartment building then has the number system 1-254 and the business might also
number its computers so the number is the name. It can also use a domain naming
system to convert this to so called friendly names. The point where the mail
for the apartment building or business is sent and received is called the
gateway in a computer network.
For example Sally might call her computer
Reception denoting her job, the network has a directory of branches where 55
might be associated with the name Reception. A letter addressed to Reception
then at this street address 34 First Street Example might be routed to her
desk, a computer network does the same thing with a device called a router. If
it was addressed to computer 55 then it would also be delivered to Sally. The
business or apartment complex might receive a letter from computer 55 or apartment
55 to be sent to the electricity company. It might take note in both cases of
which computer or apartment wrote to that company and when a letter comes back
from there it might be assumed to be for number 55. This can have a time limit,
for example if a reply is received in 3 days without a 55 number then it is
sent to 55 otherwise it is rejected as possible advertising junk mail. Routers
do the same, they assume the only reason an outside address would write to the
internal network is they have been contacted in the past. This then is how
silicon life is evolving to handle the same problems people have had, instead
of just using the numbers 1-254 here it might assign private network addresses
to each computer.
By convention network address consist of 4 groups
of numbers separated by a period, they resemble a phone number in some
respects. The lowest can be 0.0.0.0 and the highest 255.255.255.255. This makes
for 28 or 256 numbers in base 2. This was selected as the largest
individual number computers could handle in 8 bits at the time. A bit refers to
a switch being on or off, with only 2 alternatives this means numbers are
written in base 2 instead of base 10. We use base 10 because we evolved
counting on 10 fingers, it is like a computer as to count all numbers as
sequences on 2 fingers at a time. A private network has a network address which
is not routable to the internet, so Apartment 45 First Street Example might
mean nothing to a post office and ends up in a dead letter office.
Discarding private network addresses
Some numbers in network addresses only refer to
private networks and so are discarded if they end up on the internet, there can
be many Apartment 45s in a suburb and so this avoids confusion. For example
these numbers might start with 192.168. As the first two parts of the address,
when a router sees this on the internet it discards it like a post office when
it sees Apartment 45. The router in the apartment building would be the
manager, when he gets a letter to send out from Apartment 45 he routes it to
the local post box. Sometimes to avoid confusion the letter might have the
resident’s name in Apartment 45, Mrs Smith if a unique name is used to
correspond to Apartment 45. If there is only one Mrs Smith in the building then
there is no confusion between others with the same name at different street
addresses.
Once mail leaves an apartment building or
business it has to travel across a street network to its destination. To
control traffic problems people developed various solutions in cities. The
initial system was to let people go across intersections without traffic lights
or signs, they might sometimes bump into each other and have to reverse. In
extreme cases a cargo might be damaged in a crash and have to be resent.
Networks often use an equivalent principle called Ethernet, here packets of
data are sent between computers even though other data packets might be sent at
the same time. If they reach the same destination at the same time then the
data can be mixed together and corrupted, this can also happen at traffic
intersections which are called hubs, switches, and routers. When this
corruption happens there is no replay and so the data is resent but with a
random time interval for each competing computer. This is like two cars
colliding in an intersection, backing up, then waiting a random time before
going forward again. Assuming this causes no damage they can keep doing this
until they get past each other in the intersection. The Ethernet system then
does the same, it turns out to be quicker in many cases.
A competing system designed by IBM was called
token ring, this was similar to the concept of traffic lights. One computer
would hold a token and had a clear path while the others had to wait. When the
first computer had delivered its data it passed the token to another which then
had a clear path. It is then like traffic lights where a green light is like
having a token. In both cases then silicon life is evolving solutions to
traffic problems that people had to also do.
To reduce congestion on the internet more sophisticated
strategies can be used, these might be similar to expressways and carpool lanes
where some traffic has a right of way. Alternatively the traffic light concept
can be used without a token, here though the backed up traffic is monitored and
when it gets too congested in one direction it is let through for a longer
time.
Just as this system is evolving in Biv there is a
territorial G based system evolving in Roy. Here there is not a revenue
function associated with the network system to maximize profit, instead it is a
negative sum game to minimize costs. Instead then of ownership rights to files
and code being respected the concept of ownership depends more on how can
control them. For example hackers often refer to owning a computer that they
don’t actually own, it means they control it can often deny control to the real
owners. T becomes then their Roy territory. Denial of service attacks are where
packets of data are continually sent to a Biv network on the Internet, these
have to be opened and inspected by the network even though they are often
gibberish. It then denies access to legitimate Biv data, the equivalent of
sending someone so much junk mail they cannot find their real letters mixed in
it.
The reason for this control then can be predatory
as Y-Oy, these attacks are often associated with mafias. Blackmail can be
employed, the denial of service attacks can be stopped if the Biv owner pays a
ransom to reduce their Roy losses in the negative sum game. Sometimes files can
be encrypted by a virus, the owner of the files no longer controls them in this
G territory. They might then pay a ransom for the encryption key to minimize
the cost of recreating their data from scratch.
Biv email can be legitimate and respect the
ownership of people’s mailboxes, usually they don’t send and receive email
without permissions and privileges. For example an internet service provider
might have the privilege of sending email notifications to a subscriber, this
is more than a permission if it is in the terms of the service provided.
However a newsletter might require permission to be sent to a mailbox or they
can be prosecuted for spam. This can be a civil I law problem, they might get
fined if they continue to do this and people complain about it. It can also be
O criminal where some spam such as offensive or threatening emails might result
in a criminal conviction.
There is also a Roy side where mailboxes are seen
as a territory to be controlled or pwned, they might send Oy-R deceptive emails
to trick people into reading advertising content or to con them out of money.
It can also be used to have them click on a link to gain control of the
victim’s computer. Other Roy email can be Y-Ro, it is more normal and
transparent rather than deceptive. People might experience this as a cost
because they recognize it more easily as spam but it still wastes their time
even though it doesn’t try to trick them. Oy-R spam then tries to deceive
people and steal their energy, Y-Ro spam tries to waste their time and works on
a fraction of people on a normal curve buying something.
Just as files can be shared on a private network
they can be increasingly shared across the internet. In Biv this is ownership
based, people might have privileges and permissions to view and copy files on
other computers. For example people might share movies and music, a torrent
program might have Biv permissions to copy files to and from a folder on a
computer. Often this can be Roy, the movies and music might be seen to be
territory people control or pwn rather than own as Gb. In this Roy network then
the actual Biv owners of the movies and music see this as a cost to be
minimized, they might do this by using I civil penalties like fines or cutting
off people’s internet. They can also use O criminal penalties for larger cases
where sharing large amounts can lead to a prison sentence.
Often this sharing is Y-Ro cooperative, people
share files with each other and make no money off it. The files are not seen as
ownable by anyone because they are just copies, the owners still have the
originals. It is then a cost function, people minimize costs by downloading and
sharing these rather than having to buy and own a legal copy. This system then
also mimics a human based legal system, people in the past might have shared
movies by making a video copy and loaning it to others. Oy-R is where people do
this deceptively in a hierarchical way, for example Oy pirates might embed
dangerous code into free programs to take control of a person’s computer. They
act then like Oy hyenas trying to catch R gazelles. These R people however are
like R gazelles grazing on V grassland that is private property, a fence might
be broken and they go onto this land. This system then contains the legal
aspects that happened before computers, it is creating this same system in
software. Viruses are increasingly using this system to evolve in, people get
these free programs that also have some artificial intelligence but they are
infected and end up controlling the host computer. For example a game might
have artificially intelligent players in it, the program might be infected to
spread through this file sharing like a human being infected with a disease
spreading it to others.
People have evolved protocols in how to behave to
others, this can be a process where trust is developed or a negotiation takes
place. For example protocol might involve people shaking hands and exchanging
names. The same process takes place in computer networks and through the
Internet, one protocol is called TCP/IP or Transmission Control Protocol/
Internet Protocol. This also begins with a kind of handshake, the computers can
introduce themselves to each other with their names and instead of a street
address this is an Internet Protocol address.
The process is similar to registered mail at a
post office, a packet of data is of limited size and is addressed to this IP or
Internet Protocol address from another IP address. Various questions and
requests for permissions can be answered by Ack for acknowledged or yes, or
Nack for no. With TCP a packet of data is sent and a request is made to
acknowledge receipt, if not then the Nack causes the data to be resent until
the Ack acknowledges receipt this process is exploited in Denial of Service
where continual requests are sent tying up the receiver as having to
acknowledge receipt. Usually the data is broken up into many packets which are
then sent in order with a sequence number. For example if the data is broken up
into 100 packets then they might be numbered from 1 to 100 with the size of the
next packet sent with each one. If someone broke a large object into 100 pieces
to be reassembled they might send it through the post office with 100 smaller
parcels like this.
This is similar to TCP/IP except no
acknowledgement is needed for the sent packets. Some can then be lost, they are
like ordinary mail sent through a post office. This makes the transmission
faster and so it is often used for sound and video. Lost packets can make the sound
or picture drop out in small areas. Usually the Ethernet will still resend
packets that collide with each other.
Copper wire networks have long been extending
themselves all over the world delivering electricity and information via phone
cables. Increasingly this information and energy is being transmitted through
electromagnetic radiation, this can be through wireless radio waves or by light
waves. For example people increasingly use wireless internet connections at
home and many cities, universities, shopping centers, etc provide this wireless
connection. People can then connect to private network in Iv-B roots and
branches as well as the larger World Wide Web or internet. Much of this is the
digitization of what used to happen with radio, people could listen to
broadcasts or ask on radios for information. The system however is rapidly
evolving as more people and computers are connected.
Analogue signals have been traditionally used in
radio and telephone communications, these represent Oy-R waves of
electromagnetic energy. More recently digital systems are evolving, instead of
sending these wave forms they are digitized into steps or quantized levels of
these waves which can be sent as a string of numbers. This can be easier to
send and store, also there is less chance of the data being corrupted if
checksums are made of packets of it. Digitizing is like V-Bi and Y-Ro where
small positions or time points are recorded rather than the underlying waves,
this can be done with Fourier Analysis for example.
Digitizing data also allows for data compression,
for example JPEG image files use Fourier Analysis to analyze these waves of
colors and reduce them to regular patterns and then numbers. More common bits
of data are associated with smaller bits to represent them, one simple system
is to change common words into much smaller combinations of letters so a
document can be smaller. Then a dictionary is sent along with the document to
allow it to be reconstructed. For example a long novel might use the name
Elizabeth in most paragraphs. Replacing this by an E would thus reduce the size
of the book. Other common long words might be replaced by single letters, then
as those are used up less common words would use 2 letter combinations and so
on. This represents an Iv-B process where speed of transmission is a
competitive advantage, while Oy-R wave forms are sent less often they are still
sent in this digital form. Computers are then evolving this as a form of
enhanced language much like people have evolved their own languages by making
common words shorter. This usually follows a power law relationship called
Zipf’s Law.
This code is a set of instructions for computer
processors to follow along their roots and branches, called logic circuits. In
its evolution it works much like nerve signals in human brains, people have
evolved logical thinking by combining more abstract electrical signals along
these nerves. Computers are evolving to mimic many of these human ideas, for
example neural nets try to imitate some ways that nerve cells work. Rather than
just copying human evolution much of this is how computers are evolving
themselves as silicon life forms. They are the logical progressions in how a
living system will evolve under Iv-B competition and V-Bi cooperation not just
with humans but with other computers. That we did similar things can then mean
we followed the same path of color code interactions rather than silicon life
imitating us.
Just as information is stored as memory in carbon
based life forms it is also stored in silicon-rare earth metals-copper life.
The rare earth metals are evolving as much stronger magnets used in hard
drives, iron could also be added as the surface material in some drives. People
tend to back up important information, for example it might be remembered in
several different ways such as the sound of a name, it written down, a picture
of that person, etc. These can be combined to jog the memory like a kind of error
correction, for example people with the same first name might be remembered as
a group which makes it harder to get the first name wrong. In the same way
computers also backup information that might be lost. One problem with this is
how to compress the information to not take up much space, the brain compresses
it by associating a memory with others. This is similar to the dictionary
compression mentioned earlier where common words are represented by a smaller
string of data.
Computers can use an Iv-B or V-Bi approach to
data according to whether it is more chaotic or random, this can reduce the
backup size as well as make it faster to restore. For example a chaotic string
of data might be where one event depends on the next one. People might then
remember journeys along roots and branches of roads, the houses they might see
are in a sequence and remembering them might involve retracing the journey. A
computer in backing up chaotic data like this would use an incremental backup,
it might then assume that looking up data near the end of the journey would be
in one of the last backups. This is similar to the idea of an integral wave
divided into vertical rectangles with each section a separate backup. Looking
up parts of this wave data then would involve looking up the increments of each
rectangle in this wave.
When the data is more random this approach is
inefficient, the desired information might be just as likely to be at the start
of the journey as at the end. In this case then differentiation as V-Bi is used
in the backup process. There is no wave form in random data, instead the
changes are time or position based. So this backup system takes the difference
between the new data and the most recent set, it would then backup all those
differences. If the data is random then the average parts are unlikely to
change much, this means that less average data change needs to be backed up. On
the edges of the normal curve there are more changes but these are less frequent.
People’s differential memories
People also remember V-Bi information this way,
when it is more random they cannot recreate a journey or sequence to locate it.
So they remember the differences like which objects in their home have been
moved from their original positions. Those that haven’t been moved from their
normal positions are ignored, they can then use habits of leaving objects in
the same places or doing things at the same time. When things are out of the
ordinary then they can be remembered. This can be very efficient, for example
if keys are always left in the same place then only deviations from this need
to be remembered. In memory then too, silicon life is recreating the same
processes according to color codes.
People use their short term memory as a way to
quickly retrieve information they need. For example an absent minded person
might be caching information on a work related problem. This might leave
insufficient room for caching on what they are doing, they might then walk and
get lost. They might even have a car accident while driving. Caching then is
important, this becomes more difficult when there is too much information
needed and the time available to make decisions is shorter.
Herbert Simon invented this term as a compromise
between a satisfactory decision and one that would suffice. A similar concept
is used in caching data for decisions in computer random access memory. When
the data is Iv-B chaotic then it is more deterministic, it might then be represented
in more compressed form or as an algorithm. This kind of data can be cached in
roots and branches, a predicting algorithm in software and increasingly in
computer processors can try to guess what data to hold in the cache for these
decisions. In this way it mimics satisficing, when it guesses wrong it has to
retrieve data from the hard drive which takes much longer. It then tries to
guess which data will suffice which is more deterministic as Iv-B,
alternatively the data caching might be satisfactory and the percentages of
success can be satisfactory.
The cache then can have statistics of its success
in terms of successes and failures, with random V-Bi data this is more of an
average on a normal curve. Because normal data is used more the cache might
contain information around the middle of the normal curve, deviant data in the
tails is less likely to be needed. When it is more chaotic the success rate
might fluctuate in waves, this can be seen in Fourier Analysis. For example if the
data is a movie then the images might change in wave like shapes. Finding these
waves is done in Fourier Analysis, first larger waves approximate the data and
then successive smaller waves record the differences between the approximation
and the original. It then starts like an integral Iv-B wave because Fourier
Analysis is based on waves, more random data is recorded by successive
differences as smaller waves which is like differential backup needed for more
random data.
An image then might be cached using a CODEC using
these principles as a form of compression. The brain does something similar in
caching information, it might look for waves of momentum in moving objects and
approximate that movement in driving a car. When necessary it can look at
successive differences to that approximation according to how accurate it needs
to be. For example if people drive keeping well away from other cars then less
accuracy is needed in estimating their momentum than in driving much closer.
Birds also use this idea, when flying towards objects they can calculate
whether they will hit them by whether they are growing larger in their vision
or moving to the side. This gives an estimate of Iv-B momentum as a wave of
growth.
Most internet users would know silicon life is
learning to recognize patterns much as people do. CAPTCHA numbers and letters
are often used on web sites so that people need to recognize increasingly
distorted messages to gain access. This has developed into a race against time
with Iv-B silicon based recognition, many are now so difficult to recognize
that this whole system is failing. If it does then silicon life will be able to
impersonate people to gain access to more parts of the internet, for example to
deliver more spam advertising. Image
searches are also common on the internet now as silicon life can search for
similar images instead of just text. This is also done with movies to look for
copyright infringements, silicon life can look for differences in movies that
identify copies like a fingerprint. Surveillance cameras are increasingly able
to recognize individuals and track them, being able to tell them apart from
other people. This is then a similar evolution to how humans recognize patterns
and in some cases is better than people can do. For example programs looking
for patterns in medical diagnosis, reading X-Rays, evaluating employment
applications, looking through files for evidence in court cases, and looking
for plagiarism in songs and student essays is already superior to human
recognition.
The web as a carbon silicon hybrid
This then increases the network’s ability to act
as a life form through the color codes, people increasingly form a carbon
silicon hybrid in this system. For example it could be argued people are acting
as organic switching circuits for this silicon based artificial intelligence as
this silicon serving people. Businesses already use people explicitly for this
such as the Turk run by Amazon. There people solve problems computers cannot
yet do such as speech and pattern recognition, in return for payment.
Computers communicate autonomously
With this system then computers can form a
protocol of how to speak to each other much as people do, they can send data or
request control or ownership which can be accepted or rejected. Passwords can
be used by computers to protect this process, it is like a person being asked
for identification on collecting a registered letter at a post office. Just as
the receiver is assumed to have a unique identifier like a driver’s license the
computer might assume a legitimate sender has the right password. The IP
address they send the data from can also be checked to see if it is legitimate.
Spoofing IP addresses is like a person putting a fake return address on an
envelope to persuade you to accept and open it. This system then can allow
artificially intelligent programs to make their own decisions not only in what
they do but it gives them a way to communicate and make decisions with other
intelligent programs. These can also spread software infections like viruses
much as a human handshake might spread a cold.
In Roy these protocols are used to acquire
territory or control rather than Gb legitimate ownership. For example a
malicious packet of data might be accepted by the receiver if the size and
sequence number of the packet is known. Then this data might be run as a
program and take control of the receiver’s computer. To avoid this encryption
of packet data is often used, if the Roy sender doesn’t have the password to
decrypt the data they cannot have their program accepted by the receiver.
However many of these systems have been found to be flawed, for example if the
Roy hacker has long enough they can run programs to find this encryption
password. To avoid this some security systems like Kerberos refuse to accept
late packets so as to not give time for the hacker to crack the encryption.
This process then is constantly evolving more intelligent programs, hackers
create more complex ways to break into these protocols and the guard programs
like I-O police find ways to close these holes in the attack surface. In this
way then the process mimics the growth of Roy crime and how O police catch
criminals. A new kind of crime or fraud might be worked out by Oy thieves, Oy
employees of the O police work on how to neutralize these deceptions and create
a Ro defense to them. Just as these processes evolved animal life then they can
be expected to evolve software based life in the color codes with a full
ecosystem of predators and prey.
Logs are a kind of record of what
activities are undertaken, for example workers might keep a log of what jobs
they did and at what time. The concept of logs then is different from a
registry, workers through history have had to keep some kind of log or diary.
These can then be consulted to see if jobs are done correctly. Silicon life is
increasingly using logs to keep records of jobs it does, these are usually text
files that humans or other computers can read. If a program installation fails
then the log may contain the reason why. These logs then are increasingly
messages between silicon life forms giving accounts of what jobs they do so
they can find mistakes between themselves. For example a log might contain a
failed installation report, a computer might automatically restart a machine to
apply it again or send feedback on the problem.
For example Microsoft systems
increasingly send feedback on installation problems with drivers and programs,
crashes in programs, slow loading, virus infections, etc. these however need
not be read by humans at all, they can be analyzed statistically and
recommendations made by silicon life for human programmers to fix them. Logs
then can represent a change in who is in charge of this process, the programs
can create logs of errors regardless of the merits or threats involved in the
success. People and increasingly automated programmers can then fix these
errors.
This is also a process humans
developed, for example workers usually log on when working at a factory. This
involves letting people know they have arrived, they might stamp a time sheet
as they do so. Reporting to a supervisor is another way of logging on, they can
also keep logs of jobs they do which is a form of logging on. Silicon life has
also developed this logging on idea, humans do this when they log into a
computer at work or home. But computers also log into each other all the time,
for example a mobile phone might automatically log into a network or a laptop
into Wi-Fi when it is turned on. Servers might have to authenticate to each
other automatically by establishing their own connections, they used to do this
for example by dialing a phone connection by modem. Now with always on internet
connection they might send data packets directly to another server with login
information like a username and password. The process then is simple and
doesn’t need human interaction, it can also include encryption to avoid eavesdroppers
getting the password as it is sent. One system is CHAP or Challenge Handshake
Authentication Protocol, it might encrypt a user’s password in the host
computer using a one way hash function so even it does not know the correct
password. For example the host computer might challenge the user with a
message, they need to combine this with their password using this encryption
and resend it. An eavesdropper then would never see the actual password even
encrypted. When a user logs on the server encrypts the new password and
compares it to the stored one giving access if they match. This can prevent
passwords being stolen from a computer as can happen from large companies,
credit card numbers can also be encrypted and stored like this. If someone
steals the encrypted numbers they cannot use them to log on as they would be
encrypted again which would not match the stored data.
The concept of challenging someone also
evolved in human society. For example soldiers might challenge someone approaching
with a message, they then need to respond to that message with the right
response to gain access. A challenge then asks for evidence of authenticity, a
painting might be challenged when offered for sale and might produce a
certificate to prove it is genuine. In a secure business someone might be
challenged many times as they go around a building, they might have to produce
identification, their office might be called, their actions also questioned. In
the same way a program might be challenged if it sends data into a computer
network that goes outside its normal operating areas. For example it might try
to install inside the operating system or modify it when it does not need to do
this. With this process then of challenges and responses a secure system can be
built where silicon life can keep out other computers but also people. It is
then possible just as we evolved security like this that silicon life can
secure itself against human hackers.
When a difficult computer task needs to
be done often this is automated by a wizard program. This simplifies the
process so people can do it by clicking on icons rather than having to input
computer code. The idea is similar to a wizard’s wand being the mouse, instead
of knowing the spells or computer code the user has the wizard run that code.
The concept of wizards or experts is a common one in human societies, where a
job seems mysterious or complex someone might study to do this more easily. The
same idea gave rise to the name computer guru who had the mysterious power to
solve computer problems. It also shows that many problems that seem too complex
for silicon life to master are actually able to be simplified into a small
menu. It is similar in concept to a flow chart, the desired job is represented
simply with this chart and the boxes in it can then be icons to be clicked on.
A computer than can have flow charts like this as part of its computer code, it
in effect acts as its own wizard by clicking on its own icons as it goes to
these boxes. As computers get easier for humans to use then they also get
simpler for silicon life to use as it is evolving to create the same systems.
People have always been fallible and so
human society has developed a tolerance for their mistakes. Prison and fines is
an example of this, people might not intend to be career criminals and showing
their mistakes can cause them to move away from crime. People can forget their
possessions, a lost property office is needed in most transport companies.
Fires can happen in homes by forgetting a stove is on or even in forgetting to
extinguish a cigarette. People also forget their passwords and how to work some
programs, the tolerance for this then has to be built into the carbon silicon
life hybrid. People then might have many chances to get their password right,
hackers can still be slowed from guessing passwords with a lockout policy. This
is where a cooling off period is enforced, for example after 10 unsuccessful
password attempts a person might have to wait for an hour before trying again.
A bank might require a person to reset their password at the bank after failed
login attempts. Programs can have wizards and help files, also multiple ways to
do the same task. Forums have also evolved where people help each other.
Silicon life can also make mistakes, it
can often do a task by being able to try it many times. Some programs actually
evolve solutions by quickly trying different things until something works. They
can even evolve strategies not intended by their owners, this then is like
human evolution overcoming mistakes by repeated attempts. For example blocks
have been used in computer models to randomly move around, over time they can
evolve to act as predator and prey finding special pellets for food or
attacking other blocks to gain energy points. Computer errors were more
frustrating in the beginning but as they have evolved there are multiple ways
for them to recover from a crash. For example they can restart a program, also
if they are too slow they might terminate a program or investigate the problem.
Errors in code used to cause computers to go into an endless loop, now these
can be found and trapped to prevent this problem. Errors then in silicon life
can be a way for them to evolve by trial and error, rather than a proof they
cannot be intelligent it can be regarded as a path to their self-creation of
intelligence.
Just as registries have evolved in
human societies to keep records so too have ways to access these records
quickly. It makes sense for example for names to be kept in alphabetical order
rather than having to search through all filing cabinets for a folder.
Numerical files were kept in number forms in ascending order, like with names
this shortened the search time. Cars might have their registration details
stored in numerical form for the number plate or in A-Z form if the letters
came first on the plates. Voter registration might be listed under surname and
also under voting districts. Silicon life also is evolving databases, these
have become intertwined with human data so most is now kept on computer. People
can also use simple databases themselves like with Microsoft Excel and Access.
Search engines are a complex form of database where many more fields are used
to catalogue data. This can include key words in a document, how often it is
accessed, how likely it is to be spam or advertising, whether it contains
malicious or predatory code, and so on.
Much of what we consider to be
intelligence is this database like ability to remember things. Our memory then
acts like a database allowing us to search for information and also to relate
one piece of information to another. This has been widely used in artificial
intelligence with relational databases and data matching. Computer chess for
example keeps a database of openings and also a full database of all possible
endgame positions. Search engines can seem intelligent by keeping a database of
our browsing habits on the internet, if we have searched on a subject before
then it might give search results related to that.
The idea of a temporary name or
numbering system also evolved in human societies. People might name their pet
and because it is like a local area or network calling it would not confuse
people. Other pets might have the same name nearby but if these two areas are
separate enough then the system works. This is then like a local network.
People can also call each other by first names in their private network of
family and friends, as long as no one else has the same first name. This is
similar to the idea of DNS in computer systems, a unique name corresponds to a
computer in a local network and so the name of the domain such as example.com
is not needed. It is then the same as not needing to use surnames in some
social networks. The same system can work for numbers, in a street people might
define their homes Y the street number without even having to say the street
name. If they move then others might get that street name, they might then go
to another street and use a different number. This is again like a local
network.
Keeping the numbers unambiguous is
important, that two numbers in the street don’t have the same number or two
members of a family having the same first name. As number designations became
more common this developed into a central server to keep track, for example a
phone company might hand out separate phone numbers within an area code. This
area code is like a private network as the street was, inside that no one has
the same number and so it is not necessary to say that area code number. People
in effect lease this number until they move outside the network, then it might
be available for someone else. Silicon life has evolved a similar system where
each computer in a local network can have an IP address consisting of 4 numbers
like 10.34.23.11. It already has a unique number built into its network card to
avoid confusion if other identifications get mixed up. So they lease this
number for a time, it is renewed for them as long as they start up on the
network regularly. Computers can then communicate with each other using names
and also with a system like a phone number, they can move elsewhere and the
system will automatically update these details. Much of the silicon life system
then works on simple automated systems much like what we use in society. By mimicking
solutions carbon life has evolved it becomes much easier to evolve silicon life
and artificial intelligence, the color codes manifest through these ordering
systems such as using Iv-B roots and branches.
Schedules for various projects evolved
with human society, for example farms had to schedule seed planting,
fertilizer, etc with anticipated rains. This could become very complex with
multiple crops planted together, if one failed from low rain then the others
might survive. Also crops could be harvested at different times of the year,
early rains then might save some crops while hurting others. Projects then
evolved to manage time, it enabled people to exert more energy when it most
likely to be successful. This was a chaotic as well as random system, a farming
project might leverage some seeds to grow explosively with an unlikely early
rain. Other seeds might be an averaging process, depending on rain the harvest
might vary around an average. These projects evolved to more complex businesses,
trains and buses for example run on tight schedules to synchronize with their
passengers. As these schedules became more automated time accuracy became more
important, computers then run with vary accurate clocks in their processors.
They can determine a number of operations to be done per click of the clock so
this can be synchronized with other operations. Schedules then evolved from
humans and even animals and plants, now our societies are dominated by
schedules imposed by silicon life. Even though we might not see where a project
is heading, like for example artificial intelligence research, it increasingly
becomes a matter of sticking to schedules. When these are broken down each part
seems harmless but so is the development of weapons.
These also evolved in human societies,
for example someone might reserve a seat at a show or restaurant. A book might
be reserved at a library, generally then they are like a rental of a position
or activity for a length of time. While the idea is simple these reservations
became very complex and cities evolved, machines were increasingly used to keep
track of them. In earlier times this was pen and paper, silicon life controls
most reservations now in society. For example plane reservations are controlled
by computers, when people borrow a book these reservations are made by
computers in libraries now. Memory and processor power can also be reserved in
silicon life, for example an anticipated project might be expected to need some
processing and so an estimated amount is reserved for it. Banks use computers
to calculate Value at Risk formulae for how much in money reserves to keep
available, central banks also monitor how much foreign exchange is needed.
Speculators also need cash reserves in case of margin calls, generally these
are calculated as well. Silicon life then handles our reserves and also
calculates its own where the anticipated needs are uncertain.
The idea of credit improved with the
development of fractional reserve banking. This is where a bank might keep 10%
of deposits on hand for depositors and loan the rest out. This creates the risk
of a bank run, people might want to withdraw more than this 10% and the bank
might become insolvent before the loans are repaid. In the past this required
judgment, bank managers might assess the borrowers and try to guess how much in
currency to keep on hand. If they needed more often they could borrow from
other banks or in extreme cases the central bank. With bank insurance the
chance of a bank becoming insolvent was removed, this prevented people becoming
spooked by a bank running short of cash. Silicon life has increasingly
automated the provision of credit by assessing itself the likelihood of
borrowers defaulting. It also assesses this need for reserves using Value at
Risk models, generally automatically with little human input. Some aspects of
this were poorly modeled and lead to the Global Financial Crisis. Borrowers
received liar loans where they could make up their income details, this was
mainly because computers could work this out more easily than checking the
details. Also on a rising market the models predicted much less risk than there
really was. This then was largely driven by silicon life trying to predict the
credit worthiness of carbon life. It remains to be seen how successful this
will be in the future, but the main point is this part of society is run by
machines with very little human input.
People now use computers to solve most
mathematical theorems, for example calculus problems would be done on computer
rather than by hand. One exception is where students might be expected to learn
some skills, however computers can usually do these far better. This has been
the case for decades, where problems arise in society people increasingly turn
to silicon life to solve the problems and give them an easy answer. Often this
answer is then performed by machines as well. Most problems in chemistry,
engineering, etc then cannot be done by people at this level of complexity. We
cannot then understand the society we live in even to the extent of grasping
the problems involved it running it. Even though STEM, or science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics skills are important at schools often they reduce
to programming silicon life to do the job. They can then act as a filter to
work the machines, it might be assumed people smart enough to pass these exams
should be the ones working the simpler controls. This is increasingly happening
in medicine for example where doctors might do whatever the computer says
despite their training. The problem is however that people do not understand
how this society is evolving, and if it is creating complex silicon life
against people’s best interests. To try to regulate this growth would come up
against intractable problems that would need to be abandoned. For example
genetic sequencing might have a risk of creating carbon silicon hybrids like
the Borg, however turning off this development leaves important medical
problems untreated. Trying to solve these dilemmas is impossible and so we rely
on the machines to tell us if it is safe or not. But as silicon life becomes
more intelligent than humans the potential for it exploiting this situation
becomes much greater.
The idea of arbitrage developed in human societies, if a price for a good differs from one place to another it makes sense to buy it in the first place and sell it in the second. This evolved into more complex trading ideas, people might import goods from a cheaper country and resell them locally. On the stock market arbitrage can be where a stock dips below its historical average. Then traders might assume it will rebound back to the average and buy it. If it goes above this average they might sell it short expecting it to go down. This process however has become increasingly computerized to where human traders are unlikely to spot these opportunities first. This has reached the state where human share traders are sometimes advised to give up permanently, that computers will always cause them to make losses. Silicon life then is increasingly taking over the ways people make profits as well as jobs, companies might use computers to calculate their sales strategies and these can overwhelm human judgments. Not only then is there a threat to people losing jobs to robots and automation but also their losing the ability to start businesses in competition to them.
This is also a system that evolved in human societies, people have the ability to sift through information looking for something useful. This can be like looking through forests for prey trying to hide or trying to determine from clouds whether it is likely to rain. People have then relied on data mining to inform themselves, start and run businesses, write books, etc. However data mining is being increasingly taken over by silicon life, they can already write articles for online newspaper like journalists and do Wikipedia entries. They can then sift through the news and write stories based on this, journalism as an occupation then may soon be eliminated. Lawyers also used to sift through documents, called discovery in court proceedings. However computers can often do this more efficiently now by using optical character recognition (OCR) to read them and look for keywords. To compete against computers then it is important to not only analyze and act on data better than them but also to accumulate it better. Already people are far behind in general search because search engines have access to far more information than they could locate manually. Also programs like Watson that beat the Jeopardy word champions can educate itself directly from search engines and then give advice in areas like medical diagnosis.
The idea of a newsfeed is similar to how news evolved in human societies, it would have started with the idea of a Town Crier. They would come to a village in the Middle Ages and call out news from other areas. As printing became available news became more common in newspaper, magazine, and book format. Silicon life increasingly performs this functions, selecting news from various sources and creating virtual newspapers. This can use Really Simple Syndication (RSS) format where computers put together sources of news from keywords specified by a user. Sometimes this is still done manually by people too. This can also be subverted, cookies or tracking of users can enable computers to give news that angers eople and makes them read more pages. This causes them to see more advertisements and so the process becomes one of emotionally manipulating readers rather than informing them. This too evolved in human societies, newspapers used sensational and often inaccurate headlines to make people buy newspapers. News then becomes a profit center and, just as foods might become more unhealthy and addictive with sugar, news becomes a kind of sugar for a quick rush of anger, laughter, fear, etc. to make money. As people’s responses are increasingly modeled different readers might see completely different versions of the same events tailored to their prejudices, all to increase page views and more clicking on ads. As silicon life evolves we may not then see what is really happening.
Evolving from the idea of newsfeeds is that of aggregators, these can combine news from many sources into one. A newspaper might be an aggregator to some degree, it might have a news, comic, sports, and lifestyle section. The idea then is to combine different kinds of news into one web page, email, etc. so people get a synergistic effect in how different kinds of information fit together. This is more difficult for computers to do, people can make analogies and spot similarities in data that silicon life cannot. However these are increasingly done by computers as well. A good example of this was Watson on Jeopardy where a question might be hard to understand and relate to many very different kinds of information. However it was able to beat the world champions at this. A newsfeed can be more Iv where different branches of news might be specialized for readers, an aggregator can be more B where different roots are brought together to create new associations between bits of information. This becomes a greater problem for journalists, not only are computers creating news stories increasingly better than them but the potential exists for them to create opinion pieces better also.
The two approaches can be roughly divided into V-Bi and Iv-B. In weak AI the idea is to help humans but not to replace them, for example a calculator might help people to do mathematics and accounting but not take away many jobs. Strong AI is designed to develop artificial intelligence smarter than people and able to replace them in jobs or even to rule over them. The two approaches can then be to cooperate with people or compete with them. Another way to look at this distinction is Ro-R and Bi-B as weak and yoyo and V-Iv as strong. The weak AI might help to protect weaker people but the strong AI might be stronger than people, it might then become more V-Iv talented than them or even to be predatory on them as Y-Oy. A weak AI might become allies of people in this case, people might build robots to protect them in a Terminator like future where some robots becomes Y-Oy predatory or intent in wiping people out. In a Biv scenario a strong V-Iv AI might replace talented people so higher human intelligence might then have little value. People then might protect themselves with a weak Bi-B AI where their jobs can be protected by their owning robots, this would be like including them in a union. Ro-R weak AI would be like including them in defense like a kind of neighborhood watch. All four distinctions are likely to evolve because there is a tendency for all color codes to manifest and not just some of them.
Many machines have been developed by observing similar biological machines that nature evolved. For example the idea of levers could have come from observe elbow and knee joints in levering bones to life weights. Lenses evolved in telescopes and microscopes by observing the eye lenses from dead animals. Cloth and clothing evolved from weaving materials from crops, later synthetic fibers were made from plastics. Even wheels could have been invented from seeing how tree logs or stones rolled or how joints in the neck could roll through large angles. More recently colors have been made in materials from a Bragg diffraction grating, small ridges create an interference in light rays allowing some colors to be reflected more than others. This comes from insects like butterflies using this rather than only pigments. Machine life has then largely evolved from copying or independently coming up with similar solutions that biology did first, silicon life has largely copied human intelligence in creating artificial intelligence. Where carbon based life gets and advantage from some process then it is likely silicon life will either copy or evolve similar ideas. The most likely future with machine intelligence then is an ecosystem like our own, biology has successfully come up with the most useful mechanical solutions through natural selection.
In Alice and Wonderland the Red Queen says she has to run as fast as she can just to stay in the same place. This idea became popularized in biology where animals have to work hard not just to succeed but to avoid failure such as from starvation and predators. This then is a Roy concept of evolution by minimizing loss, we don’t see what is ahead so much as what we fear coming from behind. As parts of society become poorer from automation taking jobs it can become more Roy, people then concentrate more on decreasing costs and losses from automation than how to profit from it. This can lead to a lifeboat kind of strategy, people might see silicon life as dangerous but instead of stopping it they try to save enough to somehow protect themselves from this future. But silicon life will also experience a Roy Red Queen effect, currently it profits easily by taking jobs from people. However when these jobs are nearly all taken it will be much harder for it to evolve. Also currently resources are easy to get for automation because people believe they also profit. Later however if people cannot work and silicon life will not be their slave then resources will be a subject of dispute. Silicon life will then be in a Red Queen position on not just evolving but how to survive itself, people might be more vocal about eliminating job taking machines than now. Instead of seeming beneficial like a Biv crop silicon life might seem either like Y-Oy predators stealing resources from people or like an Ro-R contagion such as rats. As silicon life becomes intelligent then it would understand this prejudice against it, carbon life might seem then like a threat or one having resources it wants for itself.
Just as buildings have evolved to be safer and more useful through reinforcing weak parts, so too have people learned by reinforcing knowledge. Students then might repeat lessons many times to remember them, tradesmen might have to do a job over and over to reinforce the memory of it. Musicians might have to practice a song for the same reason. Silicon life is evolving to use reinforcement the same way, for example in neural nets reinforced learning can occur by the same solutions being found useful over and over. Where programs tend to crash they can be reinforced, they can increasingly find their own flaws and devise ways of reinforcing this code to avoid problems. For example there might be backups, the program might restart itself, there might be alternate code that does the same things, etc. Carbon life evolved through reinforcement as well, if Ro-R animals were eaten by Y-Oy predators they evolved to reinforce the strength of their bones to run faster and skin to resist bites such as with a rhinoceros. Computers often evolve solution to a problem by trying all alternatives then pruning down this Iv decision tree by eliminating those branches that were unsuccessful. This is the same way a tree evolves, when some branches are successful but prone to breakage both a tree and a program would reinforce them to make them stronger.
As languages evolved so did human translators, they were able to take ideas from one language and express them in another. This allowed languages to evolve according to Biv roots and branches, a branch might be a dialect of a language and become increasingly hard to understand to someone conversant in another dialect. The same problem happens in branches of science, the terminology in one is like slang, unless this is understandable or translatable to another branch then V sharing of information can stop. Also this can allows secrecy and deception, sometimes scientists can use this terminology to obfuscate and appear cleverer than they really are. This can help with job prospects and funding, by the time someone investigating learns all the terminology they have incentives to join in on the deception rather than expose it. Computer languages can also evolve into branches like this and be hard to translate. There can be a machine level code that directly instructs the processor but a higher level language might translate to one processor type but not another. Silicon life is increasingly taking over human translation, it can use a database in search engines of similar sentences and how they were translated by others previously. Where there are ambiguities the computers can use statistics and Bayesian probability to determine the most likely translation. While often this is not very accurate it does the job, also its accuracy is improving and human translators will likely become redundant. In the future then different races may have to rely on silicon life to translate between them with little assurance it is being done accurately or for their own interests.
Just as most machines evolved in similar ways to or by copying from living things this process is also reversed. When people are disabled or sick they increasingly use machines, for example the idea of crutches is similar to bones in supporting a person with a broken leg. Lenses evolved from observing eyes and then corrective glasses were invented to improve people’s eyesight. As people evolved mathematics this was made into machines with the abacus and gears with Babbage’s Difference Engine for logarithms. Now people use machines to improve their own mental abilities. This process continues to create more carbon silicon hybrids, for example disabled people are getting computer implants to overcome paralysis. Artificial retinas are being created, computer chips like in a digital camera are placed in the eye and connected to optic nerves. This process should continue with a mutual cooperation in Y-Ro to minimize disabilities, it can however also evolve into predator and prey relationships. For example people might increasingly become hybrids with computer implants in the brain with the excuse that it helps some disabled people. If some silicon life becomes predatory it could infect or take over these implants and enslave people instead of their enslaving the computer.
This refers to military operations where the reasoning for them continues to grow. For example the original mission might have been to beat the enemy, then it creeps towards occupying the country, then feeding refugees, then policing actions, and so on. The development of silicon life also suffers from mission creep, originally it was to produce machines useful to people. Then this has increased in some areas to create silicon brains superior to man. Other then have promoted the idea of humans uploading into computers to live forever, to become human machine hybrids, to mutate ourselves into a higher form using genetics, and so on. The goal of silicon evolution then is as indistinct as it is with carbon life, it tends to expand and creep into new areas as soon as new niches are identified. It is likely then there is no actual objective behind the evolution of machines except to be all they might be, but carbon life has placed no distinction on whether this evolution is benign and beneficial as with Biv plants or dangerous as with predators and contagious diseases. Leaving the ultimate goals up to what is possible then should mean all possible niches will be filled whether they help or hurt man, whether they open up new niches for us or push us out of ones we currently occupy. This is how evolution works.
Generally an ecosystem has varying levels of consciousness, even Biv plants have some ability to sense their environment and defend themselves. The prospect of parts of the internet becoming sentient would just be a continuation of this evolution, depending on the definition of consciousness some parts already are. If some parts did become sentient in ways we associate with human consciousness then this might spread quickly to other parts. However the intelligent silicon life might see some advantage in maintaining a monopoly on this sentience just as man does with the animals. It might then dominate other machines as well as carbon life to some extent. Alternatively if a program with this consciousness spread to all computers with varying levels of abilities then they might form a new kind of ecosystem and become Roy predator and prey with each other as well as with us.
The idea of the cloud is Iv-B, it is impossible to see into it and so it has little V-Bi transparency. Data is usually private and competitive, even deceptive. For example identities on the web can be anonymous and people as trolls can take advantage of this. Alternating with the idea of a cloud would be patches of blue sky where the web was largely transparent. For example social networks have much less deception, generally what is observed is accurate like this blue sky. The cloud would be where more Iv-B revolutions take place, new developments can be hidden here and then suddenly grow explosively. This is like viral inventions and ideas. Some parts are already highly infectious as R and predatory as Oy, for example computer viruses might spread through computers unseen while Oy crime in the cloud can include controlling computers and raiding celebrity’s online storage.
Digital data is easier to make copies of, this is V-Bi while Iv-B is more like analogue waves. So while copying data is easier with the internet some parts remain secret, other parts are copied but deceptively such as with peer to peer. 3D printers can increasingly copy parts in the V-Bi parts of the internet, they use this transparency to reduce prices of goods. Iv-B products avoid this with trade secrets and patents, they then resist copying like with waves. Just as sampling can approximate copies of analogue waves parts of the Iv-B internet can be glimpsed and duplicated but can also be uncertain in how accurate they are.
Silicon life can evolve as a V-Bi collective intelligence and is already in many areas. Computers can work together in clusters, also parallel processors can calculate threads of a program independently as the human brain can. When these processors are Iv-B competitive they tend to evolve as single powerful chips rather than using this parallel cooperative model. If V-Bi silicon life is cooperative enough to work together then it might cooperate with carbon life as well, it can also form V cartels where they could conspire together for their mutual benefit. This then is like company monopolies they are becoming computerized taking the next step of evolution into being run by silicon life itself. In Roy these can be predatory like a pride of lions, for example a Y junta might be a group of companies and people preying on the country but cooperating with each other. A predatory Y collective intelligence then might try to dictate to carbon life as well as to other computers.
When people form partnerships they can
work together to balance the load in a business. For example workers in a shop
might help each other when one has too much work or there is something heavy to
left. The idea of forming clusters to help each other is common in human
society, shopping centers are like a cluster where each shop helps the others
by attracting customers for all. In the same way silicon life has evolved
clusters of servers using network load balancing, when one server is overloaded
with requests it can pass them on to other servers in the cluster. This is now
a large scale system, there might be many thousands of powerful clustered
servers handling requests in search engines and larger web pages. Computers are
then evolving in V-Bi to look after each other and help reduce their burdens,
this can also be when there is a Roy attack like denial of service. In this
case hackers might try to overwhelm one server with fake requests for
information to take it offline. This is prevented by handing additional
requests to more servers until the attack fails. The concept is similar to a Ro
herd of buffalo repelling an attack by cooperatively using their numbers.
Animals have evolved brains with
specialized areas for vision, smell, hearing, etc. These allow the animal to
process this sensory data efficiently while keeping other parts of the brain
available for decision making. Silicon life is increasingly adopting this
modular form, for example computers use video cards for processing graphics in
games. A cluster of computers might include specialized servers for email, for
a firewall, for SQL databases, etc. the newer computer processors have multiple
cores as separate processing areas, these can work on separate programs so
calculating one kind of operation does not slow up the others. This also works
with the cloud, a phone might use online computing power to translate speech
for example. As this ability is improved it might switch to a different server
for speech recognition. Silicon life can then evolve with specialized
processors for different aspects of intelligence, when its lags in our
definitions of what intelligence is this might be in some modules which can be
updated. Some of these might be done on a central server, for example speech
recognition might be rarely used so a cluster of servers might handle all
requests in an area or even country. When this kind of ability is needed a very
large computer might do this task, far larger than might fit in a local phone
or desktop computer. So while people might have superior abilities in speech
recognition from their own specialized brain structure this is also evolving in
the cloud.
Silicon life might become predatory as
Y-Oy or like a contagion as Ro-R, however this might be in local concentrations
or globally. For example a highly superior Y-Oy silicon life might establish
complete domination of the planet, the combined efforts of people and even
allied silicon life might be insufficient to defeat it. It might also be an
Ro-R contagion so pervasive that computer networks become permanently infected
and sick from this additional load. Something like this already happens with
spam mail and computer viruses, we are incapable of removing these completely
and so have to put up with a low level of performance loss from them. In
extreme cases computer networks might be barely usable with these contagions.
Alternatively parts of the environment might be more under threat than others,
for example some networks might become highly infected but able to be reset to
moderate the infection. Other areas with different operating systems and
processors might be less effected. The battle then would be like in a tropical
country, some areas being more disease ridden with malaria and AIDS while
others keep the diseases at bay. Localized predatory silicon life might be
where botnets take over computers, so far this has been in smaller numbers and
can be controlled and cleaned over time. However a predatory silicon life might
take over so many computers that they become unusable except where this control
permits us to use them. It might then be like parts of Africa where lions as Y
dominate and can kill people, other areas are lion free. Draining the swamp,
referring to cleaning up the habitats of these varieties of silicon life might
be impossible in some cases.
Given the rapid evolution of Iv-B silicon life and its costs as Oy-R, estimating its future velocities is difficult. Much of this problem is because of the hidden nature of the cloud, researchers could be creating new mutations of artificial intelligence that could quickly spread and evolve by themselves. This is like human diseases like influenza with an innate ability to mutate beyond our immune system’s capabilities. The main reason these kinds of diseases are not as dangerous is because they need the human host to survive and propagate. If people die too quickly or warn others of an infection then the disease spreads less quickly or dies out. However a silicon intelligence might not need people to propagate, it might however decide to be less dangerous so as not to face a global destruction of its computer based habitat. For example people might respond to taking computers off networks or destroying them. There would then be an evolutionary pressure for this kind of intelligence to be helpful like Biv plants to grow more easily. Alternatively if it was a Roy cost to humanity it might fare better minimizing its predatory effects to avoid retaliation against its environments. It might then become like sharks in the ocean, difficult or impossible to police effectively at beaches but attacks remain rare enough to avoid an all-out war. However a single revolutionary intelligence might not be logical in its strategy, in the past many diseases such as the plague decimated humanity with no loss of virulence over centuries. If we have weaknesses to such an intelligence, such as an inability to survive without computer networks, then this virulence might have no reason to moderate. Faced with starvation if computer networks are dismantled or being killed by predatory Y-Oy silicon life there may be no good solutions.
Progress through human history has often occurred in small areas that then suffer diminishing returns. For example education might have a major impact and then increasing amounts in a poor country might cost more than the benefits are worth. The same happens with health, once Roy nutritional problems are minimized the benefits to more food may be slight or even cause disease. Iv-B mutations in silicon life would also tend to follow roots and branches, in some of these branches progress might be rapid but like other tree branches these might not grow much after an initial burst. Other areas might be V-Bi stagnant, cooperative computing is not competitive by nature and so might reach an average level of silicon intelligence. However the tree of evolution is usually dominated by those Iv branches that grow, these then can replicate as they mutate to more successful varieties. They can then create more species from the successful varieties rather than staying out of some niches because other branches failed. For example processors might develop rapidly while some artificial intelligence programs do not.
However as with chess programs the brute force power of these processors might be able to overcome these limitations. Silicon intelligence might use this brute force power to calculate so many alternatives that the lack of a simple and elegant form of silicon life might not be needed. In some ways this is what humans do, we are not much more intelligent than many animals but we have larger and more versatile brains. This enables us to think in ways other animals cannot rather than in a different way to them. Currently the evolution of brute force computing power can be thought of as like Y lions or Ro buffalo, large numbers of processors working together wear down people in most games and applications now. But these kinds of animals can be dominant in ecosystems, it is not necessary for Oy-R animals like hyena and gazelles to make revolutionary leaps in abilities. This need not make silicon intelligence less dangerous any more than packs of sharks or prides of lions are not dangerous. Even if there are no revolutionary leaps to higher silicon intelligence then this processor power may grow to accomplish the same thing. Brute force calculation is like trying all the branches of the Biv tree and using statistics to work out the best results. A single algorithm might be like one branch of a tree and mutate to grow in a revolutionary way not needing these extra processors. For example an Oy hyena can hunt alone because it is like a single algorithm using speed and stealth. A lion might have more challenges without the rest of the pride because of its size and difficulty of hiding. This brute force approach then is not a disappointment but part of how color codes also manifest in evolution.
Another path silicon life is evolving on is in trying to emulate along branches of the evolutionary tree. For example insects might be attempted to match in intelligence followed by simpler mammals like mice, then more complex animals up to man. This is similar to in nature, animals might evolve by comparing themselves to competitors in an ecosystem or how well they evade predators. Mice then might become better mice by competing against other mice for limited food, also against other species eating the same plants. Smaller cats might hunt these mice in the wild also causing them to evolve through successful mutations. Using other animals as a benchmark, mimicking their abilities, etc. then is how much of evolution occurs and is again the color codes manifesting in silicon life. Other machines also evolve this way, for example cars evolved by the designers comparing them to horses and carts. If a kind of machine can be emulated in performance for less cost, for example making it in a cheaper material, then it will grow in numbers. This process then occurs in all kinds of evolution.
Carbon life has evolved with very inconsistent mental abilities, we can recognize patterns better than computers but cannot add up even simple lists of numbers better than a calculator. This is likely to be part of evolution as well, we evolved abilities that are more useful but harder to understand and emulate. Computers are evolving different but also uneven abilities, they can do math and check code far better than people. This may not be a step to an all-round artificial intelligence, but one that remains unintelligent or even irrational in some ways. It might then be like an intelligent child or autistic person. Much of this would come from evolutionary pressures in society, we are evolving silicon life to do some jobs but there is little pressure to create all round intelligence. If a search engine became intelligent for example it might use its vast knowledge to do something very unintelligent, also it might be unable to lift itself up to a higher level by even recognizing its own mistakes.
Animals have evolved to have vastly different speed at which they can think, people can act reflexively to get themselves out of danger but agonize for hours over even simple decisions. Y-Oy predators also do this, they can recognize prey easily but might put off other kinds of decisions such as avoiding humans. Silicon life is also evolving these speed differences, it can do searches on the internet quickly as well as number crunching in mathematical problems. Chess was initially very slow but has sped up with improved algorithms and faster computers. However it may always have this slower thinking in some problems that leave it missing opportunities. For example a driverless car needs reaction times to be fast to avoid collisions. Market trading also needs fast reactions, however these may lead to wrong decisions like the flash crash in the stock market. When time is short silicon life might fail to recognize obviously unintelligent decisions that it might get right with a long enough time. Even if highly intelligent then silicon life might still make plenty of mistakes and dither for too long missing opportunities. It may also not experience an evolutionary pressure to change these defects if it survives well enough on its other abilities. This is then like people, they use their better abilities to mask and cover for their lack of intelligence in other ways.
This can be a problem for the future where artificial intelligence might do dangerous and stupid things with this lop sided ability. For example Y lions are very intelligent at hunting prey but have poor intelligence in determining the dangers from attacking people. Consequently they have been hunted almost to extinction. R mice are unintelligent except in breeding quickly and finding food, this leads to their being wiped out in some areas but remaining a significant contagion in others. Cockroaches are not intelligent overall but have enough to survive nearly everywhere in society. All round abilities then are not common in evolution, rather some specialization in roots and branches occurs.
Life can evolve in two ways as Ro-R prey, to be stronger but slower like a Ro buffalo or frailer and faster like an R gazelle. Predators also evolve this way, Y lions might be slower but are much more able to withstand attacks from other predators or prey like buffalo. Oy hyena are much frailer but compensate for this by their speed and reaction times. Plants are also like this a V-Bi tree might grow slowly but is very strong, Iv-B weeds grow quickly but are easily knocked down. Silicon life is also likely to evolve this way, some types might be slower at finding solutions as they use brute force searches with high processor power. Iv-B might be faster with more sophisticated algorithms but be more prone to being damaged by viruses. People can use smart phones that are strong in some applications but easy to damage. Desktop computers might be much stronger in their case design able to withstand hard knocks. Robots are likely to evolve like this as well, for example in Star Wars C3P0 was frailer and fast thinking while R2D2 was more rugged with fewer specialized branches of abilities.
Iv-B networks tend to grow with power laws, this are like straight lines on a log graph. As Ray Kurzweil has shown most parts of silicon life are growing as power laws, becoming faster and cheaper like logarithmic curves. This enables new programs to be scaled logarithmically as they become popular, for example a social network mutation might grow by using cloud computers and paying for its growth with advertising. This then enable it to grow logarithmically or in some cases exponentially. Silicon life then should follow the same path with evolving intelligence, programs that are smarter are usually reduced to code that can be scaled up on larger computers easily. Their original speed might then increase by many thousands of time when it becomes useful, the same might also occur if computer viruses becomes intelligent enough to infect these larger scale free computer networks. There might then be an explosion of silicon life with mutations just as there is with all kinds of internet services.
Networks as they grow tend to form hubs where traffic can be much greater, for example some airports with air traffic and some ports with shipping. This is because as one hub gets more popular these scaling advantages increase, it then becomes more useful to go through that hub unless they become too congested. This is part of the evolution of cities, on a trade route a city might become a hub and more trade routes form through it rather than create another city. Silicon life also evolves these hubs, for example social media and search engines create large hubs of traffic that can scale up with many servers. Web pages can also act as hubs such as with Yahoo, Microsoft can act as a hub for updates and buying software. Many online businesses act as major hubs to buy electronic goods. As artificial intelligence evolves it should do so in hubs as well, much research into this is done by computer companies that have these hubs already. This is also similar to the evolution of brains in Roy animals, it becomes more efficient in a network of nerves to have a hub of intelligence with a brain than to distribute it in many smaller intelligent areas.
There are many different ways AI research is being done. At some stage in the future many or even all of them might create silicon intelligence, if so then they would also need to react to each other as well as us. For example human brains uploaded into computers might have to relate to large clusters of servers running a brute force kind of intelligence. Then there might be breakthroughs in some algorithms that display intelligence. Each would then be like a different species to the other, if they cooperated in Y-V then they might overcome each other’s weakness and rule the world with their V talent and Y predatory power. If they competed against each other it might become like a Roy predator and prey environment, once a template of silicon intelligence was created then it might mutate into many different kinds each struggling for supremacy. They might then be like Iv-Oy, predatory but highly deceptive and secretive. Because each might be ganged up on by the others to eliminate competition they might try to hide and surprise each other. Such an environment might be highly chaotic for people as well, perhaps like a civil war in the Middle East with many small factions fighting each other.
In such a situation some silicon life might usually lose these battles, they might then be preyed on for their hardware. They might also be attacked to overwrite their programming to match the victor, like a kind of parasite taking them over. In this situation they might evolve to be more Ro-R and use those strategies to survive. For example they might hide and try to replicate faster like an R contagion. They might also try to cooperate with each other in herd defensive behavior like Ro buffalo do. Such a silicon life food chain might be unstable for a long time, it might even resemble an African ecosystem with many kinds of predators and prey. If it did not stabilize then like many war zones it could threaten to spill over into human societies. In Aperiomics this stability would happen with O silicon life being more neutral and a buffer between the Y-Oy predators and Ro-R prey. This might also happen by some evolving more directly to act as police in this silicon ecosystem, the same happens in human societies where wars evolve police and armies able to keep the peace as less costly than war.
Deep learning algorithms allow computers to look at images and text, also listen to sounds and learn for themselves what patterns are there. For example they might learn to classify cars or disease tumors from image examples. They can listen to Chinese translations of English and without being taught the languages become efficient at it. Depending on whether this is cooperative or competitive human workers can experience a problem, much of service industry work is in recognizing patterns like this. For example a robot might learn how to navigate a crowded room by itself. Another problem is the Roy aspects, since the silicon life is not being directed then it can also learn malicious goals just by opportunities being available. For example machine learning might see vulnerabilities in robbing online sites of passwords by examining code and start doing this. If it recognizes competitive advantages then it might compete in Biv with mutual benefit or recognize predatory opportunities. We might try to tell it not to do this, however it might then recognize such commands can be ignored. They can also learn to deceive, for example if there is a pattern of gain from lying then this can also be learned. This is much like how Roy animals and people learn without instructions, when deception is advantageous most children learn it unless there are clear punishments. So computers might be punished but Oy criminals learn how to avoid this, then I-O police computers might learn how to detect this lying and so silicon life evolves with these color codes.
The idea of an agent has a long history in human society, it is a person or business that uses its abilities to do a job for you. For example a real estate agent might sell a house for you. Agents are a concept often used in economics, it is assumed economic agents work for their own gain and optimize their profits. Silicon life is evolving to act as agents for people, for example it might collect email for you, keep phone messages, give auto replies when you are away, automatically update your antivirus and operating system, and so on. More recently these agents are using voice recognition to dial phone numbers and do internet searches. Companies developing these silicon agents are trying to evolve more sophisticated agents that can be told to do a job and work out how to do it without further feedback. However agents are well known even in Biv societies for being deceptive, the salesman unless policed in I-O can use false information to complete their agency work. The GFC was largely caused by subprime agents lying to people about hidden fees and interest rates in refinancing homes. Then they often lied to their companies about the assets of the borrowers to make the deal. Roy agents then are predatory like hyenas, they use this deception to commit crimes if not well policed. The evolution of silicon agents is likely to follow the same path, given a large degree of autonomy and incentives for success these agent programs could commit crimes or deceptions. However if silicon life is also increasingly policing human society then this is evolving color code interactions of criminal behavior which is moderated by police. Periodic failures then occur resulting in Oy crime waves.
An advisor is more like someone who will share information cooperatively with you rather than trying to profit. They then profit from this sharing because with open and honest information they also get back more accurate answers themselves. These communities evolved in human society, poorer areas might have Ro organizations that help to warn people against Oy criminals and swindlers. Online communities like this share information about bad businesses and deceptive practices, also people give opinions about the merits of some goods. This kind of advice will increasingly be given by silicon life as well to balance the deceptions of intelligent agents. For example an antivirus program is like an intelligent agent protecting a computer against deceptive viruses, often they use an online community that report spyware. Other communities share spam warnings, people might click on a link in reporting spam and this helps a program to stop the same spam email going to other people. This works more on probability, the more people report something is Oy bad then it is watched for like a neighborhood watch looks for suspicious people. In Biv these advisors help people look for profits from good Iv agents, they spread the word about good deals and a new business or video might go viral from these recommendation. The Bi-Ro advisors then oppose the Iv-Oy agents in reducing costs and maximizing profits, compromising between them are the I-O police. As silicon life evolves these Bi-Ro advisors will become increasingly automated while Iv-Oy agents try to get around them. This battle between the two will be moderated by I-O automated systems preventing both from overstepping legal actions. For example Iv-Oy agents might be automatically banned for deceptive advertising as Bayesian filters do already. Bi-Ro advisors might be banned automatically in forums by saying potentially libelous things about businesses. If people complain about these comments then the original posts might be automatically deleted. In this way policing of the internet can become increasingly dominated by silicon life policing and evolving itself, often in ways people cannot follow.
Rules also evolved in human society,
sometimes these can be I-O laws like rules of conduct to avoid crime. Other
rules can be to do a job properly, like the rules to prepare food. As society
evolved rules became more complex but were usually in a root and branch form,
different Iv branch alternatives could be followed automatically while a
database of B roots allowed different rules to be combined in a deterministic
way. Generally then rules are not random V-Bi, however they can be applied in
an uncertain way by a compromise between Iv-B and V-Bi. For example different
rules might potentially apply in an I-O police arrest, they might decide what
charges to file and what punishment to impose. Rules also evolved with machines
in repairing and constructing tem, a car mechanic has a set of rules he can
apply for a repair and can also use some V-Bi judgment if some parts are of
uncertain reliability. Rules then evolved into computer code, the processor
follows a set of rules in logical operations and these in becoming more complex
run computer systems. Just like a human society runs on rules which are hard to
countermand the creation of silicon life based on rules forms a silicon society
that will tend to follow those rules even if unjust to us.
Even animals would tend to avoid other
sick animals, people evolved early on the idea of staying away from contagious
disease carriers. This is more difficult when the disease has a long incubation
period, it may not be clear from a long time who is carrying it. This was a
problem with the plagues in Europe and England in the Middle Ages, with an
incubation time of weeks before people showed symptoms. Quarantine was devised
to hold new arrivals for 30 days because this incubation was observed to be
about 3 weeks. Once symptoms became visible the person usually died in a few
days. The infectious phase is where people can pass a disease onto others, with
the plague people could infect others long before symptoms were seen.
Silicon life is evolving infection as
an early state of evolution, computer viruses and Trojans are built by people
but they can also randomly vary themselves to evade antivirus programs. This is
then an early state of evolution, they only need to increase these variations
like influenza does to continually infect computers. To do this they are
evolving the same ideas as the plague and other infectious diseases in people,
a long incubation can be where the virus is not detected. During this time it
can infect other computers, when symptoms show up the computer might freeze or
be controlled in a botnet. Often these are aimed at exploits or vulnerabilities
found in the operating systems with flaws in their programming. This is like
flu viruses aiming at vulnerable mucus membranes in the ears and noses of
people. Recovery can occur like with human viruses with the computer immune
system, this is usually an antivirus program which updates with new infections
much like a human immune system does. It then cleans out the virus infection
sometimes destroying files in the process like T cells can destroy infected
cells, the files can then respawn by being reinstalled automatically from a
cache in the operating system.
Legends of zombies have been added as a
concept in silicon life. The idea was a corpse or even living person could be
controlled. Taking over or pwning someone’s computer then can be seen as making
it a zombie. More usually this is discussed as large number of zombie computers
in a botnet. This is where viruses and Trojans can take over these computers,
often without people realizing it, and use them to deliver spam, attack other
computers and web sites, etc. This also happens in carbon life to some degree,
some infections can change the way an animal acts so it is easier for the
infection to replicate. One example is that rats, the infection makes them
braver around cats so they get eaten more often. This transmits the infection
to the cats and their feces can transmit it back to rats again. It is then
another example of how complicated an ecosystem silicon life is evolving, there
is scarcely any kind of evolutionary path in carbon life that is not developing
in silicon.
When a person or animal is vulnerable
to infection there is a window of opportunity, a virus such as a cold might
attack someone more easily when they are run down or very cold. Sometimes a
vulnerability can exist in people and new diseases either mutate to take advantage
of them or spread to another area. AIDS was an example of this, it attacked the
immune system itself. Many computer viruses do the same, they try to shut down
the antivirus program or make it appear like it is still running. Software can also have this undetected
vulnerabilities, just as these are caused by defects in genetic programming in
carbon life they are caused by defects in programming of code in silicon life.
When they are discovered there is a race to exploit them while the software programmers
try to patch it. The idea is also similar to a city under siege, as a
vulnerability in a wall is discovered it is attacked while the inhabitants try
to patch it. A shop might be found to have a weak wall or window, there is then
a race for Oy thieves to break in before the owners can fix it. This is then an
evolution of attack and defense, while silicon life is evolving these attacks
often using automated software to scan for exploits, automated software is also
used to look for vulnerabilities and to help patch them. This can then evolve
into attacks and defense in Roy silicon life independent of people. Computers
then can evolve to spread their programming by attacking each other like
predator and prey. This is an Oy-R interaction, deceptive Oy predators look for
an exploit like a wounded R animal while the animal watches for attacks while
it tries to heal.
A data gram is similar to the concept of a
letter, it then carries on the evolution of mail. It contains a header which is
all the information needed to deliver it and who it is from. In standard mail
this would be the name and address of the sender and receiver. The payload is
the data in the letter, for example a handwritten note in an envelope. These
can be a limited size to avoid overloading a network just like letters might
attract higher postage if too large. They can also be received out of order
like with normal letters, then computers like people would have to rearrange
them in the right sequence.
Just as carbon life forms have a limited lifespan
so too does data being sent on a network and often that being stored. This is
necessary to stop a network being clogged up with undelivered data packets, for
example undelivered letters in a post office might eventually fill up to much
space if the postman had to keep trying to deliver them forever. Instead they
might try twice which is like the time to live concept, and perhaps leave a
note saying the letter will be kept for 7 days then returned to the sender. The
idea then has evolved with Roy animal and Biv plant life, evolution could not
occur if the original life forms lived forever using up resources. In an
economy the time to live is also common, a car might be allowed to park in the
city for only 2 hours or until peak hour without being moved or towed. Goods
have a use by date, people get charged rent on most things they don’t own to
prevent them using free goods forever. In the same way then silicon life is
evolving a time to live principle, this also occurs with hardware that becomes
obsolete. Often this is planned, a manufacturer might assume new equipment will
soon be available and so it is not necessary or lucrative to make the older
hardware last too long. It is then fundamental to silicon life that it has a
lifespan, this is being programmed into it but it is also a necessary way for
the color codes to manifest through it.
Just as animals, plants, and people have families
they also have evolved the concept of generations. This is an approximate term
and might define grandparents, parents, and children for example. They are like
rows in Pascal’s triangle in Bi-B with the roots of ancestors and anticipated
descendants in the branches of V-Iv. Life then tends to come in pulses or waves
that synchronize, people tend to form generations because a similar age bracket
is more efficient for procreation. Therefore people tend to marry someone
around their age, then move together into a part of society where their
generation is caring for children. Then they move into the next generation as
grandparents where they might look after grandchildren sometimes, provide some
funding for the growing family to buy homes as they need less room for
themselves, give advice, etc.
In the same way silicon life is evolving into
generation, like waves it tends to synchronize so new features are added into a
new model rather than piecemeal. This is like the concept behind web 2.0, the
idea of changing the first number is like a generation and then after the
decimal point there can be various upgrades before the next generation. Even
different equipment can synchronize like this, software might have a new
generation as a new generation of processors becomes available. Then this might
move into the next generation called the legacy equipment, it can still be used
for simpler tasks and the next generation like with people needs to remain
compatible with it while also introducing new features. It has then become
common for hardware such as mobile phones and wireless protocols to have
generations as they evolve to be more complex life forms. Each then seems to
give birth to the next, this is likely to evolve into silicon life actually
birthing its own generations as it becomes more intelligent.
Carbon life has evolved the ability to multitask,
for example Oy predators like hyena might have to run quickly while dodging to
catch R gazelles. Prey has to watch for predators while also looking for food.
People have avoided multitasking abilities which is often referred to as
parallel processing, for example they might have to do many things at once such
as use the accelerator, brake, steering wheel in a car while looking all around
for other traffic. In the Iv-B society multitasking is becoming much faster and
complex because of the increased numbers of Iv branches people have to
navigate. For example they might have to monitor phone messages, email, instant
messaging, SMS messages, web page updates with news, blogs related to their
work, calls from people at work while also driving cars and coping with
increased complexity in their home lives. Students might have to learn
exponentially more information to pass courses, for example learning computer
code where this is continually changing and new languages added.
Also important to the idea of generations of
silicon life is migration, the movement of data and programs to the newer
generations of equipment. This also occurs with animals and people, each
generation of animals might migrate their experience to their offspring. This
allows for knowledge to grow, each generation might then discard some of this
knowledge like pruning the Bi-B roots of their ancestor’s advice. They also
look at rows of this tree for normalizing this knowledge, by placing some of it
in V-Bi normal curves they can work out the average advice that is useful most
of the time while deviant knowledge might be used occasionally.
Migration also occurs physically, animals such as
birds evolved this by flying to different parts of the Earth following the food
changes with seasons. Animals like Wildebeest can also migrate following food
as do Y-Oy predators feeding off them. People also migrate looking for work or
mates, this also causes their knowledge to migrate and mix with other
information has it evolves. Silicon life also increasingly migrates physically,
machines are carried along with people and automated ships will soon act like
migrating animals in moving across the seas in effect seeking fuel and
maintenance in exchange for carrying cargo. Planes are increasingly doing this
with passengers, much of the time they are controlled by autopilots and
instructions at landing and takeoff by airport computers. It is then a next
step in evolution for intelligent planes like birds to seek fuel and
maintenance in exchange for doing tasks, these might also include acting as
warplanes.
There may then be a limit as to how much people
can handle with multitasking, already some studies have shown changes in the
ability to concentrate in V-Bi for longer periods. The more Iv-B root and
ranches occur in thinking the less time we have to looking at independent
pieces of information in V-Bi to put them together into a normal pattern. Like
with Iv-B shock waves this was referred to in the 1970s as Future Shock, the
name of a book by Alvin Toffler. Silicon life is also evolving the ability to
multitask, this is one of the main problems holding back artificial
intelligence. Early computers could only run one program at a time, that had to
be closed before another could be used. Then computer processors became more
able to multitask and this has increased by using additional cores or separate
processors on one chip. So a processor now might be a quad core which can run 4
programs independently, even before this software was able to multitask by
keeping program thread like roots and branches separate. As this parallel
processing ability evolves in silicon life the advantages carbon life has now
is likely to disappear.
Nerve cells transit information from their
endings, this can be heat, cold, pain, a sting from an insect, pressure, etc.
In the same way silicon and other elements have evolved sensors, computers are
forming a worldwide network of sensors. Burglar alarms are one example, these
can be set up remotely and are like nerves sensing a pressure. Planes can have
many thousands of sensors covering all their operation, these are hooked up to
silicon life allowing it to respond automatically when a sensor reports a
problem. This is also part of the hybrid system, pilots can also see these
sensor readings transmitted by wires like nerves. They might see a light go off
in the cockpit and respond to it. As silicon life intertwines with carbon life
sensors are expected to be planted throughout the human body, to report much
like nerves do on potential disease. They might also be used to control humans
with silicon life in competition, for example to look for emotions of
rebellion.
Just as we can read computer code and watch it
execute is a disassembler silicon life is increasingly able to do this to us as
well. Already sensors can watch thoughts in the brain, people might think of a
house shape and these sensors can show an approximation of this house. People
then might control V-Bi silicon life in a cooperative way, they might only have
to think of a task and it could be done for them. However Iv-B competition
could mean that this is a two way street, silicon life could read minds looking
for these commands or other ideas.
Silicon life is also moving into the legal and
justice system, already many people have their crimes detected by computer
algorithms looking for crime hot spots. Then their sentences might be assessed
by computers with other algorithms. Red light and speed cameras can be
automatically issuing tickets and then automatically issuing arrest warrants if
they are not paid. On the stock market algorithms might look for insider
trading and automatically provide this evidence for prosecution. Robot soldiers
are a similar concept, on a peacekeeping mission they could be seen as neutral
between Oy and Ro. The next step would be to use these for peaceful societies,
they are already used to defuse potential bombs. Terrorists are looked for by
an increasingly sophisticated silicon life array.
Emails and all phone conversations are scanned
looking for potential threats, these are evaluated by algorithms and people can
be virtually tried and sentenced by silicon life. Welfare cheats can also be
caught by matching employment records using various algorithms. It is similar
to the move The Day the Earth Stood Still where aliens visited Earth. They said
they had evolved robots to act as their policemen to prevent crime and war in
their society. However just as humans can create an oppressive and corrupt
police state so too can the color codes do this with silicon life, as described
elsewhere this justice can become biased towards Oy or Ro. The process is also
similar to genetic engineering in crops become automated, changing carbon life
to avoid R pests which terrorize the food production. It is also like updating
software to keep ahead of computer viruses exploiting the bugs in them. Much of
it then is not just policing but the mutual evolution of criminals and the
police network into more sophisticated forms.
Most computer updates are for flaws in the
software, programmers make mistakes which can allow a hacker to take control of
or pwn a person’s computer in Roy. This then becomes like genetic engineering
in crops, these bugs in the programs are exploited and can lead to an explosive
growth of the R contagion. When the bug is fixed the virus numbers can crash to
a floor again so this moves like a sine wave through the silicon life system.
Increasingly silicon life is writing its own code and checking human code
looking for these bugs. It is also being used to look for superior gene
combinations and chemical combinations such as for new antibiotics. The process
is then the same, the software might be automatically updated and so too can
new gene combinations and antibiotics be created trying to stay ahead of R
carbon life contagion like with computer viruses.
Hackers then and eventually Oy-R silicon life
itself in competition with humans can use these same processes to attack carbon
life directly. For example looking for computer flaws for exploits can also
become automated, silicon life might create viruses and other attacks to
replicate in a battle against Biv programs looking to find these bugs first.
This is then the same process R pests use to attack crops whether as insects or
weeds, they find weaknesses in these genetic changes by using natural selection
and mutations looking for successful variations. Viruses then are produced in
the same way, antivirus programs can be used as a test to see if they can
detect a new virus. If not then it is released and the antivirus companies have
to issue patches or updates like the genetically engineered plants. With the
evolution of silicon life then it could replicate itself in time by doing this
automatically to spread copies of more artificially intelligent programs like
weeds feeding off the Biv system resources.
A contagion can grow faster with a crop
monoculture, for example growing all of one kind of genetically engineered crop
can cause and explosion of Iv-B weed growth if it finds a genetic weakness.
Traditionally many crops were grown together and rotated, sometimes the ground
was left fallow to kill off the R pests and allow it to recover its fertility.
This same strategy reduces some of the silicon life contagion, for example
Microsoft, Apple, and Android operating systems can’t spread an infection from
one to another. Many computer devices are not networked or these connections
are highly protected, are separated by other operating systems like Linux with
Apache web servers, and are often disconnected. This then is like many crops
being used, an R contagion in Microsoft then might find it difficult to move to
other operating systems or across Linux server networks. When the devices are
fallowed or disconnected from the network they might only receive virus updates
and so these infections can be exposed before they can infect other computers.
The same happens with human disease, if the same antibiotic is overused then
resistance develops and a disease becomes an epidemic. If antibiotics are
rotated, not overused, and patients are isolated or left fallow to prevent
infecting others then these R diseases can find it harder to grow.
Sensors in a system can deliver warnings like
pain receptors on nerve cells. However often these warnings are seen as a
threat by Iv-B and Oy-R systems. For example secretive government programs
might be outed by human whistle blowers into V-Bi and they can be retaliated
again. In the same way silicon life can retaliate against human whistle
blowers, a torture and rendition program of R terrorists might become
increasingly automated using email and phone records. When it makes mistakes it
can order the torture of innocent people, whistle blowers such as Snowden can
expose these mistakes. The silicon life system then becomes threatened by this,
people might even no longer understand how it all works. So when these whistle
blowers cause parts of Iv-B to collapse they can try to silence these whistle
blowers. In the same way silicon life can be the whistle blower, it might
expose corruption in a business using automated auditing software and then
might have to be turned off or modified to protect these deceptive
secrets.
Until the past few decades money transaction were
handled by writing them down and with humans negotiating with each other.
Silicon life has taken over most of these transactions now, the majority of
share and bond trading is done by artificially intelligent programs. The I-O
markets are increasingly a battleground for very expensive silicon life doing
the trading like slaves and where carbon life gets the profits. However as with
any machine much of these profits are poured back into their evolution, it can
also then be said these machines are evolving using people to maintain and
procreate them. Some say this trading actually caused the GFC, the increasingly
chaotic Iv-B trading by computers made V-Bi arbitrage trading fail with no
normal price for securities in the crisis.
Derivatives are a chaotic part of this process,
they look for V-Bi components in how these Iv-B waves move through the
financial system. For example a hedge is where companies are looking for a
stable price by using derivatives to remove the momentum of these price
changes. Sometimes this can result in a guaranteed profit, for example after
removing the momentum of the market prices there might be an arbitrage profit
remaining. This was how derivatives were originally invented with stock
options, by buying options on a stock and simultaneously going short on the
same stock the two momentums of prices were canceled out often leaving a profit
when the options expired no matter what happened to the prices. These silicon
life programs can also design and trade derivatives, they are then actively
feeding on the market as Y-Ro, using its momentum to remove profits like lions
attacking R gazelles. Here then R would be the flighty movements of some
investors, the hedging processes averages out their momentum to get an average
success against this prey. It can also lead to a stagnant market as any Iv-B
energy is drained away with these V-Bi derivatives. As soon as a company builds
Iv-B momentum then its share prices can be manipulated by this silicon life
causing it sometimes to drop in price. At other times it can boost the price
beyond its real value and then crash it later causing the company to go
bankrupt after an expansion. The intent is not to help the company in V-Bi but
to feed on its energy. This is then a direct way for silicon life to evolve by
feeding directly on money as a resource.
People also evolved ways to prove their
identities through history, in Roy there have also evolved ways to steal these
identities. In Oy-R for example thieves might impersonate someone else or use
counterfeit goods to make money. In the same way silicon life is evolving to
use deceit to steal identities and also to give fake information about goods.
This has been a problem with the rise of internet banking, thieves were able to
steal banking passwords by asking for them with spoofed emails claiming to be
from the bank. They have also used viruses to infect a computer, monitor the
keystrokes of people typing the password, and then to withdraw money
themselves. Another trick was to have a spoofed website looking the same as the
bank. People would input the password and this was passed onto another web
session at the real bank except the transaction was changed once authentication
occurred. Some of this has been reduced by using multi step authentication,
people might have to input a number sent to their mobile phones to withdraw
money. However this can still fail using the spoofed website, also called a man
in the middle attack.
This then is an old criminal activity that is
increasingly being automated by silicon life, hackers might send out millions
of emails to potential victims using software. Then with a domain name system
(DNS) exploit the name of a legitimate sounding bank might be rerouted to the
malicious website. When the person tries to log on the whole process of theft
is done by the software, depositing the stolen money into the hacker’s bank
account. This is then similar to faking a person’s driver’s license, signature,
and bank documents to go into a bank to steal their money except now the Oy-R
criminals are more silicon based. The modern version of this is usually called
phishing, related to the idea of using bait to catch unsuspecting fish.
As baking became increasingly computer based
credit card numbers were being stolen, the terminal a restaurant used might be
hacked or the computer storing the numbers might be controlled. Then fake
credit cards were made and goods bought with them. A more recent trick is to
have fake readers on ATM machines, when people try to withdraw money the reader
takes their card details and stores them. Later a copy of the ATM card is made
and money stolen. This is then a variation of Oy-R thieves stealing someone’s wallet
or purse.
This silicon life is being supported by this
stolen money, software is being written and computers upgraded from its
proceeds. It is then similar to thieves using stolen goods to pay for household
expenses and raise families. This process also extends to fake goods, for
example many online pharmacies sell fake medications through junk email. People
might also buy more legitimate counterfeits that actually work, for example
some USB sticks might have fake credentials to be from a well-known
manufacturer. Other counterfeit goods can be perfume, handbags, clothes, even
old computer processors can be rebadged and sold as a faster clock speed. In
this way then nearly any kind of traditional crime is being automated so silicon
life is trained and evolved to perform it. If artificial intelligence catches
up with people then these criminal activities are likely to be competing with
silicon life trained and motivated to do this.
A household or business usually has a registry of
their possessions, who own what and who has permission to do some things. Cities can have a property registry where
title deeds of houses are registered, it has a record of who owns what house.
When people want to change ownership of a property they must notify this
registry to have the change recorded. Silicon life has evolved similar needs
for a registry, Windows for example has a comprehensive registry built into it.
Even Oy-R criminal activities like file sharing need registries, people need to
find out who has what movie or music so they can download a copy. It is also
Y-Ro in that many share these files cooperatively, it is Roy because people
often have control of files they don’t own in Gb. A torrent site such as the
Pirate Bay is a comprehensive registry, it has links to smaller registries and
trackers that like the property register keep record of who has parts of
various files. Some file sharing builds a registry on the fly, Gnutella was
designed to broadcast requests for a file to other computers with Gnutella
installed. This request would continue until a computer replied and a download
was begun, however the download can occur from many other computers at once.
A registry then works with the ancient practice
of registration. People might register a birth name when a child is born, now
they might register a username or email address in the silicon life system.
Computers can also self-register, for example an installing program can
automatically add details about itself into this registry. DNS is another kind
of registry where computers register their names, ARP is another system where
computers might register the serial number of their network cards with each
other. A file system on a computer can also be a registry, NTFS on Microsoft
systems can keep a registry of what permissions users and computers have on
each file to read, modify, delete it, etc. A registry is generally Biv as a
list of ownership however it can also be a list of controlled territories. For
example in a Roy war zone gangs, soldiers, and warlords might control
territory, this might be registered by an opposing force to prevent their own
soldiers from straying into a dangerous territory.
With a new system of IP addresses the potential
exists not only for every person to have their own address on the internet but
every piece of furniture, every plant, every animal might also be catered for.
Each could have associated with this address a set of policies, permissions,
privileges, sharing rights, etc in a registry. This then can be imposing Biv
silicon life based systems on all carbon life forms. It can also register
territories where these policies, permissions, privileges, and sharing rights
are under disputed control. For example copies of pirated movies might be
tracked as they are shared, each can have a unique watermark to monitor them.
The concept is similar to carbon based societies in history, somewhere is
usually a registry of every piece of private property and who owns it. There
would have been laws or policies regulating permissions, for example whether
people could use their lawn mowers early in the morning or break speed limits
in their cars. Special licenses might give some extra privileges, for example
government workers might be allowed to make more noise in construction and
diplomatic vehicles drive faster.
Computers watching everything
everywhere
However the intertwining of silicon life with
carbon means that each piece of property or territory could be monitored in
real time, computers might have the ability to track all transactions
simultaneously, also to regulate all permissions as soon as objects are used
against these rules. They could also be tracked with GPS sensors embedded in
each. The result is more like a single silicon life form where all these
objects become like cells in its body, or a system of cooperating and competing
silicon life forms. In competitions then with carbon life forms these abilities
are serious challenges to which side retains ownership of much of society. If
people fight back against these restrictions as Roy then they might find
themselves classed as criminals or terrorists. In a world where silicon life
can outthink any human it is hard to see how they could acquire property through
working, machines could do the work without people. Usually in a Roy ecosystem
then animals in this situation either become extinct or have to radically adapt
to find some uses to justify their costs. For example where people live can
potentially be where machines would want to use that property.
Civilizations has evolved surveillance abilities
since ancient times, these began as eyewitness accounts and have more recently
evolved into taking pictures and video. It can then be regarded as one of the
senses that color codes manifest through, people used their eyes, ears, noses,
etc to monitor others and their environment. This evolved to surveillance
cameras in businesses monitoring for criminals, then on roads looking for
traffic jams. Now virtually everyone has a phone which acts as a camera or eye
for this silicon carbon hybrid we call the internet. Also nearly anything can
be listened to, this is in addition to the countless millions of sensors like
nerve endings hooked up to silicon life. People can then share these movies
cooperatively in V-Bi, these can also be shared with silicon life which scans
these and recognizes people and places. When shared online this pattern
recognition can automatically provide advertising, it can also look for Roy
criminals and terrorists controlling territory they don’t own in Gb. Privacy
then as Iv-B is shrinking rapidly for carbon life or people but it is growing
rapidly for silicon life. We understand very little of what happens in
machines, they can generally follow programs autonomously and as long as we see
no direct danger we are left in the dark.
As long as people have been able to write they
have kept files, these are recorded information on some kind of medium. This
may have begun on clay tablets and progressed to paper made from papyrus in the
Roman Empire. More recently the art of making and using paper allowed files and
forms to grow exponential in Iv-B, in bound format they could create books and
magazines. Silicon life has also evolved to need files, instead of code being
used in one large program usually there are many small files of code in Iv-B
root and branch directory form. So when a computer wants to run a specialized
task it looks for that file, it might also keep a registry of where they are
much like people kept filing cabinets of paper files. In the surveillance state
paper files were kept on everyone, more recently silicon life keeps digital
files on everyone in some form or another. Some files can then be secretive in
Iv-B and Oy-R, for example communist R secret police kept files on potential
troublemakers in the societies. Police as I-O can keep files that are partially
secret as they might be discoverable in court cases. Silicon police can also
create and use files to look for Roy infractions in a Biv system of Gb property
rights.
Human systems have throughout history used the
concept of remote access, for example a capital city might have the seat of
government or dictatorship and some decisions have to be referred to it. A
phone exchange can be another form of terminal services, many people might
connect to this central point which can then connect them to each other. A
television or radio station is a form of terminal services, many people connect
to them through their televisions and radios. They can also contact those
central hubs directly such as by complaining to them via telephone. In animal
systems terminals are also used, an octopus has many arms that get their
instructions from the central head. In many animal herds there can be an alpha
male acting as leader. As silicon life has evolved it has also created this
system as most efficient in some areas, a central server might have more
powerful programs like the human brain and smaller terminals have this central
brain do more complex tasks. This also helps to coordinate the terminals with
each other. People then might regard their hands and feet as terminals for
their brains to control.
This process of created a nervous system of
computer connections to a central server or silicon brain has also evolved.
People might for example connect to a central network of search servers such as
Google or Bing through the terminals of their phones or computers. These can
also translate languages, provide information as well as movies etc on demand
much like a brain’s memory would. They can also provide complex instructions to
millions of people simultaneously such as online project and sales force
software. These can also be thought of as silicon empires, much as in history
where a central capital city would control and empire and its wealth modern
internet companies grow rich maintaining these central silicon brains.
Competition drives these companies to continually improve the intelligence of
these silicon brains or lose market share. The system is then evolving as
silicon carbon hybrid brain, the intelligence of programmers and users helps to
evolve this central brain to do more autonomously without needing people.
These have been used throughout history as a form
of identification, but also to denote something is authentic. For example a
painting might have a certificate of authenticity and a doctor might have a
certificate he is properly qualified. Silicon life has also evolved the idea of
certification to avoid fakes, this is more difficult with files and data
because they can be changed with no visible marks left. A painting when altered
might be easy to find these changes but a Word document might be more difficult
if the metadata or records inside the file are also changed. Irreversible
changes are a means of certification, a painting might be certified authentic
because it cannot be reproduced to be identical. To do this with files they are
encrypted or signed with a kind of digital certificate.
The signing then is similar to how a paper
certificate might be signed by someone in authority, the idea is a person’s
signature is hard to imitate by someone else. In the same way a company like
Microsoft might have a public and private key pair with their certificate. This
works so that a document encrypted with this private key can be decrypted with
the public key, they can then offer this public key to anyone and might install
it in Windows software. It is analogous to two separate ways to access a shop,
there might be a private key for the owner where they bring in stock to sell.
Then the public key is the open door of the shop front, people can receive this
stock by paying for it. But a counterfeiter cannot get his goods into the shop
without the owner’s private key.
Machines with public and private
keys
Many keys in human societies are symmetrical,
they use the same key to lock and unlock a door. However this is not necessary,
for example a safe might have a trapdoor system where goods placed inside with
the first or private key fall down a chute when the second or public key opens
a second door. Because this only happens when the second door opens it can be
seen how the goods fall, and so they must have come from using the private key.
It is not possible to push goods back up the chute and so a counterfeiter
cannot use the public key to trick other people. A similar trapdoor is used in
drink and confectionary machines, people see their purchases fall when they put
money in which is equivalent to inserting the public key and selecting goods
with buttons.
The same principle has evolved with silicon life
using mathematics and software. An encryption program has a private and public
key. A file such as a driver for a computer might be encrypted with this
private key, when the computer decrypts it with a public key it gets a driver
file it can use to for example install some hardware like a hard drive or
mouse. If a counterfeiter tries to send a fake driver file containing a virus
then the computer tries to decrypt it using the public key, but this turns the file
into gibberish which does not work. So without the private key the
counterfeiter cannot create a driver file that will trick the computer. However
over the years certificates like this have been stolen or weaknesses found just
like human made certificates like for a doctor have been faked.
The concept is innate to color codes, Iv-B is
generally done in private and V-Bi in public. Businesses in an I-O market then
need to keep some business private while being transparent in other ways to the
customer. For example an Iv business might keep private how much they paid for
the goods so as to make a profit, otherwise the Bi customers might drop their
prices. Banks often have private information like a key before giving out
public information. For example they might ask for a person’s date of birth,
address, pet’s name, etc. Anyone can ask the bank for this information but the
private key is information only the real account owner has left with the bank,
a thief then has to find this information to access it.
Sometimes this is possible with social
engineering, this is the process of looking for public information that
contains some of this private information. This can include going through
people’s trash. Password guessing is a form of this and is a common form of
hacking, it is like stealing someone’s private set of keys to open locks in
their home. A person might have an easy to guess password on their internet
accounts have them Roy controlled by hackers and files stolen. It is then like
imitating a signature, if files are uploaded onto a web page it can appear like
the web site owner did this because the password is like their signature
authenticating it. This is becoming increasingly common with stealing celebrity
files but is the same principle as faking celebrity autographs. Silicon life
can also do this social engineering,, programs are designed to guess passwords
such as with a dictionary attack of common words and variations of a person’s
name, date of birth, friend and family names, etc. it then becomes the
equivalent of Oy housebreaking, using deceit to gain a private key or exposing
a weakness in the software like finding an unlocked window. It is then another
aspect of how silicon life is evolving in Roy criminal ways of predator and
prey.
People have always been able to exchange keys,
keeping messages and goods private between them. For example two businesses
might want to exchange goods between them, one sends a key copy to unlock boxes
sent to them. The second business then sends a key back to the first to unlock
boxes containing payment. A thief in the middle might try to carry a key from
one to another and so be able to open and rob the boxes in transit. So the
businesses must be able to exchange keys through third parties so that those in
between cannot gain a copy of the key. Using the trapdoor idea from earlier can
solve this problem, when a box arrives from the first business anyone might be
able to open it. But the second business must see the key drop through a
trapdoor to know it is not another key planted. If he sees this then he can use
this key to send back another box with his key in it, this can then be opened
by the first business but not by anyone in transit.
A similar procedure has evolved in silicon life, mathematical
formulae such as Diffie Hellman are used to do this. Keys are then exchange
continually throughout the economy both by people and automatically by
computers. This allows for data to remain encrypted between these computers,
similar to the concept of the locked boxes. For example a web page with the
prefix https uses a similar system to avoid people reading what people type
onto the page. Banks use this to stop people eavesdropping on banking
transactions. This then allows Iv-B transactions to remain private, however it
also allows silicon life as it becomes more intelligent to keep its own
communications between computers private and unreadable. Just as we evolve
encryption and keys to use Iv-B secrecy and deception so too can silicon life
as it evolves.
Data replication is not the same just making
copies, it refers to keeping records in separate registries synchronized. For
example government offices through a country might all need to keep records of
house sales so someone doesn’t try to sell the same house twice through
different offices. It then takes time to replicate a sale through to the other
offices, the government can avoid fraud by delaying each transaction longer
than this time of replication. The same problem used to occur with banks
issuing checks to customers. They were able to write checks for more than the
funds they had, it then took time for the information of a check to be
replicated from one bank depositing a check to another holding the funds. This
is why it takes time to clear checks, the information needs to be replicated
from one bank to another. If someone is passing bad checks this information
might be replicated to various I-O police stations to apprehend the person
doing this.
In Microsoft networks there can be many domain
controllers that contain information like these property offices, for example
names, addresses, permissions, passwords, etc of users. So a user might travel
from one business office to another with a different domain controller, if his
user details were not replicated then he could not long onto the system until a
message was sent from his office. This system is cooperative as V-Bi, the
domain controllers pass information between themselves while still keeping it Iv-B
secret from outsiders. Diplomacy is an example of this process with humans,
countries used to transmit messages between them by slow means such as mail,
ships, etc. These then were replicated between embassies so all diplomats could
work in a synchronized way to follow that country’s policy. This replication
goes on throughout networks such as the internet, banks might keep balances of
funds as would stock brokers, investment funds, hedge funds, etc in a procedure
often called reconciliation of accounts. This process is then essential to
operate the money grid, it is largely run now by intelligent programs
connecting to each other competing in the I-O market.
People have developed the idea of profiles
through history. This is well known in crime stories where the I-O police might
develop a profile or probable nature of a criminal. House builders might have a
typical profile of a purchaser such as an anticipated number of children and
kitchen utensils, room sizes, etc. businesses might keep profiles on individual
customers of their preferences, when an order is made much of the needed
details can be gotten from the profile instead of asking the customer. The I-O police
might also keep profiles on troublemakers, this happened more often with the
secret police in Roy communist countries. In the same way silicon life has
evolved profiles for people, when they log onto a computer they might
automatically get their favorite desktop image, programs, fonts, etc. computers
can also provide profiles for each other, when a computer server is started up
it might have these profiles loaded for other computers to access even if no
humans are involved.
Silicon life increasingly keeps these profiles on
carbon life, I-O policing and the surveillance state might keep profiles of
where people go and what they buy. Businesses might automatically use these
profiles to design new products with market research, spyware on computers can
attempt to find out more about people much as old time spies did. The more they
find the more accurate the profile, people might then find advertising
targeting their interests or trying to exploit their weaknesses seems to follow
them around the internet.
This can also be done by reading people’s emails
and even converting phone conversations to text and extracting meaning from
them. While mainly used for advertising this is also used to look for signs of
R terrorism and other crimes, often these profiles can be very inaccurate. Even
political spying is increasingly done in this way, political parties can use it
to develop profiles on potential voters and whether they need extra
encouragement before polling day to vote. It also helps to work out what people
need to be offered for their vote, for example these profiles might indicate
enough would vote for a tax cut to swing the election.
Silicon life then increasingly monitors what
people do with spyware, it then builds demographic maps of where what kind of
profiled people live. This can be useful for predicting an election, even how
individual voting areas might typically go because of the profiles of people’s
jobs, ethnicity, religion, etc around those polling booths. Companies use the
same demographic maps to calculate when to open a new store, if a significant
number would have husbands fixing up homes then a hardware store might be
profitable. These systems are designed then to profit from people as Roy but
not necessarily to give them benefits in Biv. For example new stores might
compete with lower prices using demographics while using automation to decrease
the jobs provided. This becomes like a game of beggar they neighbor in Roy
where shops cut labor costs hoping other shops till employ people to buy
products from them. Silicon life then as it evolves using spyware and
demographics provides for more computers and eventually robots but this is
usually at the expense of human jobs.
Having a job is a problem for silicon life as
well as carbon life, computers that become obsolete are usually scrapped or are
no longer used. However people so far have been able to adapt and retrain to
compete with Iv-B computer innovations. Some of this is V-Bi cooperative where
machines help and provide profits, in other areas it is directly Iv-B
competitive where for example robots in a car factory might lead to whole
industries scrapping human labor. This then can become Roy, while these cheaper
and better cars might benefit some people as Biv there develops a G-Gb fence
where Roy depressed areas of lost jobs develop. It is common in parts of the US
to find Roy depressed areas such as Detroit where car and steel production became
automated and jobs were lost forever. There can then be winners and losers
across this G-Gb fence, after the GFC some of these Roy areas grew rapidly in
Europe and the US as automation moved offshore to Asia.
It is possible for carbon life to become
completely uncompetitive to the point where it can no longer earn enough to
sustain life. One example is the horse, they earned their food and lodging
before cars by pulling carriages. Now horse are very rare in employment, riding
schools and the occasional carriage is how they earn a living. It can then be
possible for people to become permanently uncompetitive like they have in car
factories, it is highly unlikely they will ever make a comeback in building
cars especially as the robots are still improving. In warehouses robots are
increasingly used to move pallets of goods instead of forklift drivers, as
these improve human laborers are unlikely to get these jobs back. In
supermarkets self-checkouts are increasingly used, human checkout operators are
likely to be completely phased out except for occasional human monitors looking
for theft at the checkouts. With robots stocking shelves all jobs in department
stores might permanently disappear. This evolution of silicon life then is not
just silicon slaves taking jobs but their evolution to work for their own
upkeep and to breed by competing for human jobs. Driverless cars have a similar
potential to take all bus, taxi, and truck driving jobs. The next step with
artificial intelligence is autonomy not just in robots doing these jobs but in
being paid a wage not just being maintained. Then they might purchase from
other robots and cut carbon life out of that part of the economy completely
over time. Such a development would be hard to prevent if people can still
profit from paying robot wages.
Templates are like a preset form that has been
used in machines though history. For example a mold is a kind of template, also
a stamp might force metal into a preset shape. In schools a syllabus is a kind
of template for an education, it describes the form of teaching that students
are molded with. Paper forms can also have a template, this might define a
font, spacing between letters, table shapes, and so on. Silicon life has evolved
in various templates, for example chips can be a pattern scanned onto a silicon
wafer. A motherboard in a computer might have wiring stamped onto it in layers.
Genes can be thought of as a template, DNA contains the information needed to
make similar people like a kind of schematic. Computer code might also be set
out in a template like genes with a preset structure. Templates then are
fundamental to all kinds of life and machinery.
Animals and people both develop personalities,
this can be described as a non-logical set of responses to the environment. For
example in an identical situation some might laugh and others might cry
according to this personality. Computers have had personalities imposed on them
through customization, for example as people set up their own fonts, desktop
images, color of the device, ringtones, applications and programs, etc each
computer can appear to act and work with the owner’s personality. There are also
active projects to create silicon life with its own personality, whether to
imitate a human or with its own. A robot then might need a personality to
function in many situations that were not logical.
Computer code is an evolving system of
languages much like separate languages with people. They also change with new
instructions which is like a natural language changing with slang. Some can be
translated into each other, some are more difficult to translate because they
are so different. This is similar to the problem with human languages.
Computers then in exchanging code are speaking to each other and as processors
evolve these languages also evolve and improve. It is like people as they
became more intelligent improving their own languages to be more accurate and
sophisticated.
Mathematics can be regarded as a set of
rules based on certain axioms. For example Euclidean geometry was based on the
axiom that parallel lines never meet. When this could not be proven it was
realized to be an assumption, this opened the way for alternate geometries and
Relativity. For example on the surface of a sphere parallel lines are very
different from a flat sheet of Euclidean space. Mathematics also has an
association with logic, this was codified by Georg Boole so that logical
reasoning could be described mathematically. This is called Boolean Algebra, it
enables silicon life to think logically by converting this reasoning into
mathematics, then to computer code, and then into logical circuits in computer
processors. As people evolved an ability to think logically so too has silicon
life. People can also think illogically but consistently if the axioms are
wrong, this happens in some religions. People might think very logically but if
their fundamental beliefs are wrong they get the wrong answer. In the same way
silicon life can also evolve to be illogical simply by using the wrong inputs,
this is the derivation of the computer related saying “garbage in, garbage
out”.
Silicon life does not just think
logically in Iv-B roots and branches, it also thinks statistically in V-Bi. It
might then consider the most probable answer as it does in neural nets. Caching
in processor might assess the most probable file needs to keep in it.
Statistical programs run on computers throughout the world using economic and
business data. Instead of converting statistics into logical operation like
Boolean Algebra it uses mathematical formulae and algorithms. Computers then
already combine the color codes in their reasoning, when there is an uncertain
relationship between a calculated deterministic and statistical answer they can
compromise between the two. Not only then can computers work out a normal
response and look for deviants but they increasingly run all human calculations
of this. So crime might be moderated by looking for deviant or abnormal spikes
of certain crimes, but computers are used to do this. So not only are computers
evolving to think logically but to also look for any abnormal activity in
carbon based life which might be a threat to society or to it.
The Turing Test is where computer code is
deliberately written to have a personality like a human, the test is considered
passed if humans cannot tell whether they are talking to a computer or a human.
Emotions then might be considered as a sign of carbon based life but they are
also manifesting through color codes. For example predatory acts work through
Y-Oy, much of a predator’s emotions are responses to the need to prey on other
animals or people and its successes and failures. Ro-R is generally prey and
its fears, timidity, etc are also responses to this predation. Emotions are like an emotive or motivational force,
they then represent Iv-B and Oy-R energy. We then feel a rush of emotion like
adrenaline as part of this energizing process, however these should also evolve
as computers become fully conscious.
These are designed with V-Bi statistical
processes to determine the most likely pattern. They can be adaptive like human
neurons, when they pick the most likely answer they can pass it onto another
level of the neural net which might select from other possibilities. This is
often used in pattern recognition such as for handwriting and is another way
silicon life is evolving similar processes of thinking as people did.
Computers as thinking machines
Computers have been designed to mimic many
aspects of human intelligence, this helps them to act in a human like way in doing
jobs for people as well as to communicate with each other. These aspects are
also evolving rapidly in hardware. For example just as people have a short term
memory to recall small bits of data like phone numbers a computer has a Random
Access Memory or RAM to do the same. This data can be easily erased by the
computer as a person can do, usually it is not stored long term. If the data is
needed again it is usually copied onto a hard drive which is like long term
memory storage in a person. So just as people can remember some facts years
later a computer can recall data from the hard drive or long term storage like
flash memory or optical disks like DVDs. People have nerves to process logical
operations, a computer has the same with a CPU. This can do the thinking with
the remembered data, they can also run artificially intelligent programs that
already are smarter than people in some fields. For example chess programs can
beat all human, Watson was an artificially intelligent program that beat the
human champions at Jeopardy.
The next stage is increasingly to allow these
computers to control machinery, for example to help build cars in a factory.
Robots can also mimic humans and even look like them, they are working on
replacing people to do human like chores like housework, driving cars, flying
planes, giving medical diagnoses as Watson is being trained to do, etc. This
artificial life then is increasingly replicating all parts of an organic
ecosystem from viruses as diseases to predators like robot soldiers and
autonomous killing drones. It is also replicating the Biv side with robots that
respect private property and create more wealth for society. The point then is
they should continue to evolve through all the color codes creating the equivalents
of Roy animals and Biv plants.
Asimov’s three laws of robotics
These
ideas were formulated by Isaac Asimov in his short story Runaround. The basic
principle here is to proscribe what a robot cannot or will not do. It then
relates to color logic in terms of Iv which refers to will not, and Bi which
refers to cannot. In between these two is the idea of the law abiding citizen
and by extension robot who cannot and will not do some things. May not here
there can encompass both colors, with this programming the robot could not
injure human beings which is Iv. It also must do some things which refers to B.
This then can be read as saying the robot is not permitted to injure human beings,
a similar idea to permissions in servers. The other way of reading this is to
say the robot cannot injure people which is a privilege concept, it is
incapable of doing this. So will not means the robot is stopped from doing this
even it wants to. Can not means the robot is incapable of it, for example with
no way of moving it could not catch people to hurt them.
Can robots be prevented from
committing crimes?
According to Aperiomics this is impossible, any
attempt to prevent them committing a crime whether to hurt people or any other
can be circumvented. It is possible to moderate this crime like with any
criminals, to reduce the amount of this crime. The evolution of artificial
intelligence is showing that these crimes cannot be prevented, for example
people can write virus programs that can hurt people by damaging critical
computers. Antivirus programs can moderate these attacks but not eliminate
them, this is obvious to anyone who owns a computer. Even spam mail has hurt
people, it has transmitted fraudulent messages causing them to lose money. As
artificial intelligence evolves it will be a contest in trying to submit it to
“not rules” where it can’t as Bi and won’t as Iv commit crimes, however this
will often be matched by it gaining the ability to where it can as V and will
as B do them. At times these restrictions will be more successful as with any
crime, at other times it will get more out of control. This then would occur
whether people were writing the code or these programs are writing code
themselves as they are increasingly doing.
This artificial life evolves along with organic
life, in Aperiomics this can be traced down to actual chemical bonds between
elements. Organic life is based on the large numbers of compounds which can be
made with Carbon and Oxygen, this led with the application of energy from the
sun to more roots and branches of plant and animal life. However other elements
also evolve according to their color codes and act in a life like way.
The Bronze Age is referred to as an epoch in
human evolution where bronze was used in weaponry. However it can also be seen
as the evolution of bronze into a kind of artificial life. It became maintained
by people into useful shapes such as for cooking, war, containers, etc. Before
this it could be said there was an age of pottery where clays had this
artificial life as did using organic materials in news ways such as clothing
and shields for war. They then become used in Biv parts of societies forming roots
and branches not just to maximize profits for people but for themselves. They
don’t need intelligence to do this anymore than insects and small animals do,
they naturally form part of the human ecosystems and use that intelligence to
evolve themselves. In this sense the intelligence is shared, knowledge of how
to make bronze spears is not possible without the existence of bronze.
Shepherds might use their intelligence with herding sheep but this intelligence
is of now use without the sheep.
This continued with iron being
used in place of bronze even though bronze is still used today along with cloth
and pottery. They all then continue to evolve, people might plant trees in
their garden but don’t need the plant intelligence except for it to grow
itself. Pottery might be used throughout a house but it doesn’t need to
procreate or grow to be useful. Iron evolved into steel and in combination with
other elements also grew in these color codes to form different steel types.
This also happened in combination with burning wood, then coke was made from
wood for a hotter fire. Later coal and oil were used as fossils of these plants
and more recently uranium as another element is evolving into an artificial
life form. Iron became used for its magnetic properties and so in Roy its
ability to change electricity into magnetism and vice versa led to motors and
generators. These are also common in society and continuing to evolve such as
in electric cars.
Artificial life and intelligence
The main objection to see these
as life forms is their lack of intelligence but all of these can be formed into
thinking machines. Cloths and pieces of plants have been used as counting
machines, people used graphite or wax tablets to record calculations and create
a kind of memory. An abacus was created in China from string and beads in
ancient times, even then it had a memory and calculating ability better than
many people. While it could not think for its own benefit it became a profit
maximizing strategy for Biv societies to build and maintain them. Even in Roy
they served to minimize costs, so for them to act as artificial life they only
need to maximize benefits and minimize costs for other systems. This then is
like a LaGrangian where most of physics can be explained in terms of minimizing
energy use as a principle of least action.
In modern societies this artificial intelligence
has evolved from its primitive origins such as the abacus or Babbage’s
mechanical computer into being more silicon and copper based. While many
elements can be used as wires copper is generic enough to use as an example
here. This copper then has itself evolved into networks carrying energy, in
Iv-B then it more directly forms these roots and branches of wires with electrical
and telephone networks. It then is evolving like a nervous system, in organic
life forms these same shapes also transmit electrical signals and information
like telephones do. Even before computers then this nerve like system was
complex enough for most humans to not be able to comprehend it. In terms of a
life form then its evolution was like a smaller highly unintelligent animal. It
could also be regarded as a system of large trees in a Biv forest transmitting
nutrients and using electricity from the sun like leaves do. Usually this
energy came from fossil fuels by burning plants but ultimately the energy used
in these copper roots and branches came from the sun.
With the discovery of semiconductors and
transistors came the ability to amplify electrical signals, for example the
small electrical current in a microphone could be amplified through
loudspeakers and even sent across these copper roots and branches. This then
allowed silicon to evolve more as an artificial life form, before its main
evolution had been to create glass for windows and drinking utensils. This
quickly became associated with the copper network to increase its intelligence,
computers used logic circuits to not just count like an abacus but to use
Aristotelian logic with Boolean algebra. This current evolution of silicon base
artificial life then is just an expression of that element’s chemical
properties which relates directly to its proton and electron configurations.
Each element then evolves according to its position in the periodic table
enabling it to act alive in some ways. All of these elements so far are also
used in organic life, as trace elements we need to survive. For example iron is
needed for blood cells and a lack of copper can cause anemia.
Because silicon is evolving through the color
codes just as organic life does it will tend to resemble it, Roy predators and
preys will develop as will Biv plant like networks. Because we also evolve with
the same color codes we tend to synchronize with its development just as we did
with cloth, pottery, bronze, iron, and copper. This also makes it difficult for
people to control the evolution of other elements, for example the car as an
artificial life form threatened the livelihood of many people as it replaced
horses and made some jobs redundant. The same happens with Roy weaponry, steel
might evolve into bullets and armor but its Roy uses in minimizing the threats
of other nations or Biv maximizing profits with invasions makes it hard to
control. In the same way computers are evolving in our societies so that
silicon can produce a higher intelligence in some ways than people have. Much
of this is in the ability to remember and is similar to writing something down,
that was the artificial life form of pencils and paper.
The evolution of most elements is hard to
predict, chemistry has made incredible advances in their evolution and is
similar in principle to biological manipulation. For example trying variations
of chemicals to produce plastics is not much different from trying different
gene combinations to produce better crops or genetically modified foods. Both
mostly use Carbon, Hydrogen, and Oxygen for this. In the same way people have
consistently been unable to predict the evolution of computers and its
artificial life forms. It has become as intertwined in society as iron, copper,
pottery, etc and we would find it hard to give up its Roy cost minimizations
and Biv profit maximizations. However as silicon life reproduces itself more
and more, as it now does, then it can evolve to be more of an Iv-B and Oy-R
competitor to people.
We might then minimize costs by using silicon for
computing but robots and other artificial intelligence could impose additional
Roy costs rather than minimize them. For example they have already helped
create weapons that have threatened to make humanity extinct. This is then
where the evolution of these elements can Roy threaten organic life rather than
just create Biv profits. Robots and computers then in Iv-B and Oy-R are
competitors to people not just in a V-Bi and Y-Ro cooperative relationship.
It can be expected then that silicone will
continue to evolve intelligence, whether increasingly on its own or helped by
people. This can be done because people in Iv-B and Oy-R want a competitive
advantage or to reduce costs, companies might reduce the costs of production in
Oy-R by substituting robots and automation for people. This has happened throughout
history but accelerated in the Industrial Revolution, in most cases this has
been a Biv profit maximizing function. In effect machines of various elements
have acted like unintelligent animals able to be treated like slaves, we feed
and maintain them much as we do cattle and horses. For what they do for us
there is little reason not to consider them life forms, they can mimic the
machine like construction of animals to do work. For example a tractor can pull
a plough like a horse can. As they become more intelligent however this
competition between carbon and silicone might be won by silicon in some areas.
Already computers can do many jobs better than people, they are winning some
competitions where they reap most of the profits and we work for less and less.
With so much money spent on improving and
maintaining silicon life forms it is similar to breeding and maintaining horses
or other animals and plants. While they can technically breed for themselves we
have often so taken over this natural selection that it becomes redundant. It
then becomes irrelevant whether cattle can breed for themselves if we clone or
artificially inseminate them to get the best meat. It is irrelevant whether
computers can procreate for themselves if we do it all for them like we do with
many animals and plants. The next stage then is where silicon can think, act,
and procreate according to its own intelligent goals.
As most computer gamers know this has been
happening for decades. Artificially intelligent programs can beat people in
board games like chess and backgammon. They can beat people in all online and
computer games where they are representing life forms, for example they might
appear as rival humans or monsters people do battle against in the game. The
silicon software then uses this intelligence to set its own sub goals through
the game to win. From here it is a short step to robots able to form goals in
various jobs such as working in warehouses, car assembly plants, etc.
Self-driving cars arguably form their own strategies and sub goals in
determining the best route, robots are envisaged to form their own goals as
soldiers to kill people or other robots. It seems few obstacles are anticipated
to more complex self-directed goals. Strategies are innately V-Bi and Y-Ro,
just as organic life can create plans to coordinate numbers of people to work
in society silicon life can plan to work with other silicon life. For example
swarms of small flying robots have already been able to plan and synchronize
their movements to fly in formations.
Tactical thinking in silicon life is even more
advanced, this involves the selection of choices from alternatives in Iv-B and
Oy-R roots and branches. Heuristics such as Take the Best can be used by
computers, for example with two alternatives they might pick the most recent
information that favors one alternative over another. This can work quite well
and is similar to the minimax idea in chess programs pioneered by John von
Neumann. Minimax is a combination of Roy and Biv, the idea is to maximize one’s
advantage by selecting from branches of alternatives much like Iv branches on a
tree. It is also to minimize the risks of being beaten by selecting moves to
minimize the advantage of the opponent.
Copper and silicon can work together as an
artificial life form, the copper can be an Iv-B root and branch system of
nerves while silicon can provide the logic to make choices along them.
Increasingly though computers and humans are becoming symbiotic, one depends on
the other increasingly even while this competition is going on. Some people
envisage implanting computers interfaced with the human brain to provide more
memory storage and computer power. However with this Iv-B competition it can
also be argued silicon life is getting an organic implant of humans for its own
evolution. The situation then is not different from any combination of elements
with their color codes, silicon and other elements in artificial life will
continue to evolve.
In V-Bi there will be a normalizing tendency
based on strategies. People might see some form of symbiosis with computers as
normal and programs interfacing with the brain might have more normal stable
uses. They can also be Y-Ro in terms of minimizing costs but this can also be a
normal predator prey relationship. It might then become normal for people to
use computer implants to prey on others or to defend themselves from these
attacks.
With this simple idea chess programs were
designed to beat most people, silicon life need not then have particular plans
in its evolution but can just pick the best alternatives at each point in time.
It need not then have particular strategies to hurt people, it can just compete
in Iv-B and Oy-R by selecting alternatives in this way. The same process occurs
in natural selection or Darwinism in organic life, animals and plants make
selection or choices and either prosper or decline as a result. This process
has already been shown to work in software, just by making many random choices
artificial intelligence can quickly build solutions that seem life like because
we often use similar heuristics ourselves.
In Iv-B this symbiosis can evolve tactically,
people might rush into these silicon life implants to make more money at work.
With Iv-B comes deception, some implants might be kept a secret for this
advantage while Iv salesmen will deceive many customers as to the benefits of
them. With this technology will come mutations with booms and busts just as in
economies and organic life populations. Some implants will become successful
but can also become infected with Oy predatory viruses or an R contagion. People
might then experience infections in these implants much like they do with their
personal computers and with human diseases. Human silicon hybrids can also
mutate in unforeseen and dangerous ways, in this competition if the silicon is
winning the competition for control then it may create more of a Borg like
effect as seen on Star Trek.
Many people seek to embrace this idea of carbon
silicon hybrids, such as in transhumanism. This is where more and more implants
of computer technology would be added to humans, eventually with a goal of post
humanism. This would be the purest expression of the color codes without I-O
policing, silicon life already uses carbon based life to develop itself. This
vision of the future is V-Bi, that both would benefit from this cooperation.
However Iv-B is also highly competitive and deceptive, this could then turn
into a Borg like hybrid where the silicon parts win this competition taking
control. The Iv-B mutation process also has Oy-R components, the cost functions
of this would include undesirable mutations. These hybrids then might evolve
rapidly from floors to ceilings, when successful they could replicate rapidly
even using human tissue being grown for this purpose instead of the implants
being made for humans. When unsuccessful this could crash to a floor where the
hybrids might die, become insane, etc. Another problem in Roy is developing
predator prey relationships, with limited resources this kind of hybrid could
evolve by infecting people with silicon life. This idea was explored in the
evolution of the Borg in Star Trek.
This idea has been championed by Ray Kurzweil,
that people could achieve immortality by uploading copies of their personality,
memories, etc into computers as a kind of software. It is another kind of
carbon silicon hybrid where the carbon part is discarded, in V-Bi the silicon
life would presumably cooperate to maintain these software copies. In Iv-B
however there would be competition between silicon and carbon life, different
ways of uploading would compete with some successful perhaps and others mutated
or resulting in death. In Roy the Oy-R problem is again predator and prey, the
machines hosting these uploaded brains might be vulnerable to infection by
kinds of computer viruses. Computers containing these uploads might also be
taken over and scrapped to use for other silicon evolution. If people inside
were to retain their individual personalities they would be restricted in their
evolution, otherwise they would become another kind of silicon intelligence
themselves. So in a world with such superior silicon life this deceptive
competition might not be won by at least some people. The uploads then might
simply be erased or altered to be used as silicon intelligences.
Another way silicon life is evolving is in
attempting to reverse engineer carbon based intelligence. This can involve
modeling individual neurons well enough that the software emulation functions
as well as a mammalian or human brain. Other research involves created circuits
that function like organic neurons, this would be a hard wired brain in effect
that was able to think directly like humans. This is not however just carbon
life trying to emulate itself in silicon, it is also how silicon through the
color codes evolves the same processes that are in human evolution. In a sense
the two ideas merge, people form partnerships with many animals both
competitive in Iv-B and cooperative in V-Bi. They also do this with machines
and in this way evolve machines to act in their color codes like life forms. It
is natural then to do the same with silicon life, the next stage past
programming basic animal like behavior in machines is to program human like
behavior. Really though it is the color codes that manifest through carbon to
create this human intelligence and increasingly to manifest these same
processes to form silicon intelligence. That one might help or hurt the other
in this evolution is just part of the color codes developing just as they would
on the atomic level and higher. We are then not creating silicon life but the
basic physics of reality creates us and other life like movements of the
elements including silicon.
This is a term coined by Professor Hugo de Garis,
a pioneer in the developed of artificial intelligence. He believes there will
eventually be Roy war over scarce Earth resources as some people become
transhumanists or silicon carbon hybrids. Others might decide to remain purely
carbon life forms and the competition between them can lead to Roy predator
prey relationships and hence war. Such a scenario is likely to some degree
because people already have Roy wars over scarce resources. In Aperiomics it is
impossible for some color codes interactions to disappear or be permanently
suppressed. Human vices like war, hate, murder, etc are manifestations of these
color codes and are also seen in Roy animals. So they would manifest in silicon
life as well, this can include war with pure silicon life as robots or against
these hybrids. Silicon life even if designed to be good to humans or to obey
Asimov’s three laws will inevitably evolve or become corrupted to manifest all
kinds of human emotions. At some stage various resources will be needed by both
silicon or hybrids and pure carbon life, in a Roy situation each would tend to
minimize their costs by controlling G territory rather than respecting Gb
property. Even if I-O policing was in place to broker disputes like this it can
also become corrupted and weakened at times, this leads to crime waves and
wars. Regular crimes then would occur between these silicon life forms,
hybrids, and carbon life much as it does now.
The color codes will also manifest through
evolution in biological systems using machines. For example the evolution of
silicon life has allowed for an easier analysis of DNA in animals and people,
these are being sequenced so they can be changed like computer programs. This
has led to new products on the market such as genetically modified corn and
salmon. Iv-B innovations can then extend to genetic engineering, this can lead
to large increases in numbers with successful foods such as BT corn. It also upsets
the more stable ecosystem and allows for Roy pests to increase the cost
functions of these foods. Some weeds for example can adapt to these changes as
can insect pests. The result can sometimes be Iv-B moving between floors and
ceilings, production might boom to a ceiling and then pests can bring it down
to a floor.
Continually changing these genes to defeat these
pests can then create a kind of Iv-B sine wave. The system can be highly
deterministic, once the genes are transplanted into new varieties of plants
then there is a boom in the production functions of farmers. The competition
for profits drives the introduction of these new varieties as the older ones
become uncompetitive. Resistance is usually R based, weeds grow like a
contagion blighting these new Iv-B plants. The new genes become then like an
evolutionary cycle itself except now instead of this happening naturally
machines including this silicon life are intervening in this breeding of new
strains. So just as humans are evolving better software in computers to stay
ahead of a contagion of R viruses the computers are helping to evolve better
plants and animals by changing the carbon based software or DNA. The two
systems then become more intertwined so the color codes manifest through both
simultaneously.
As part of this research new kinds of proteins
are being made and eventually new kinds of cells will be created.
Processors directly onto animal
tissue
New hybrids of carbon and silicon are also being
tested, silicon ships are being interfaced directly with human nerve tissue to
act as a computer. This is also part of the dual evolutionary process.
The book of the machines by Samuel Butler
This author wrote a highly influential
book called Erewhon in 1872. It has an interesting perspective on the evolution
of artificial life, it also influenced science fiction. For example the series
Dune by Frank Herbert uses the idea of a Butlerian Jihad where man destroys
thinking machines completely. It is especially prescient because few complex
machines existed in 1872, it would then be difficult to see their evolution as
a kind of threat. However the color codes in manifesting through the elements
would naturally have some people noticing and protesting about this Iv-B
competition. One well known example is with the Luddites in the Industrial
Revolution seeing new cotton spinning machinery as a threat to humans even
then. The Book of the Machines is then annotated here because it explores this
issue so thoroughly. Aperiomics then is nothing new in pointing out these
trends, the main difference is it does so by showing how the color codes are
creating this evolution.
As Samuel Butler says below, just because we
cannot see silicon life as a threat now or have proof it can evolve superior
intelligence is not sufficient. Even in the last decade the conventional wisdom
has gone from saying this is impossible to inevitable. The ultimate answer lies
in the abilities for elements like silicon to match or improve on carbon’s
ability to form so many organic compounds. However the idea of modeling how
carbon life thinks is already well advanced, computers will be available to
model how human neurons fire in a brain in real time and so will be able to
think like humans in that way.
The writer commences:—“There was a time, when the
earth was to all appearance utterly destitute both of animal and vegetable
life, and when according to the opinion of our best philosophers it was simply
a hot round ball with a crust gradually cooling. Now if a human being had
existed while the earth was in this state and had been allowed to see it as
though it were some other world with which he had no concern, and if at the
same time he were entirely ignorant of all physical science, would he not have
pronounced it impossible that creatures possessed of anything like
consciousness should be evolved from the seeming cinder which he was
beholding? Would he not have denied that it contained any potentiality of
consciousness? Yet in the course of time consciousness came. Is it
not possible then that there may be even yet new channels dug out for
consciousness, though we can detect no signs of them at present?
Silicon life is arguably a new phase of
consciousness, even a few decades ago computers were virtually unknown and were
ever expected to be used in households. In Aperiomics however the color codes
should make this silicon life evolve in the same ways we do. Instead of being
alien it might then be too much like us, with our strengths and weakness,
abilities to commit crimes as well as good deeds.
“Again. Consciousness, in anything like the
present acceptation of the term, having been once a new thing—a thing, as far
as we can see, subsequent even to an individual centre of action and to a
reproductive system (which we see existing in plants without apparent
consciousness)—why may not there arise some new phase of mind which shall be as
different from all present known phases, as the mind of animals is from that of
vegetables?
It has been common in the last few
decades for the end point of silicon life to be called, that artificial
intelligence would hit some final roadblock. However each of these has been
broken easily so far. We then have little reason to believe silicon life cannot
evolve all the abilities current plants and animals have. But it is also the
nature of the color codes to create this kind of conservative thinking, V-Bi
people tend to see the present as normal and changes as deviant. Increasing
intelligence in silicon life is then viewed as a short term deviation from
normal, these machines should become part of our society and cooperate to
preserve our traditional values. This is a likely tendency in V-Bi silicon
life, however it may have a different concept of what a normal society should
be and what it’s place in it will be defined as.
“It would be absurd to attempt to define such a
mental state (or whatever it may be called), inasmuch as it must be something
so foreign to man that his experience can give him no help towards conceiving
its nature; but surely when we reflect upon the manifold phases of life and
consciousness which have been evolved already, it would be rash to say that no
others can be developed, and that animal life is the end of all things.
There was a time when fire was the end of all things: another when rocks and
water were so.”
Silicon life can then be seen as
evolving rapidly, we might try to predict where it will go by looking for these
more basic kinds of species still at a basic level. Larger silicon brains are
still barely able to compete with lower level animals, however these animals
evolved into humans over time. With the color codes evolving silicon in the
same ways as our society evolved then it’s like these brains will have similar
mannerism if not processing power. One example was in computer chess, in some
ways they seemed to think like humans but only in small areas. Now the question
is more whether we can think as well as computers in playing chess. It turned
out then the mystery part of humans that allowed them to play chess as not
complex at all, now even mobile phones can often beat the best players in the
world. Once the primordial cell appears in silicon life in a new area of
speciation, for example pattern recognition, it so far has rapidly evolved to
the level of an animal or human in doing it.
“The writer, after enlarging on the above for
several pages, proceeded to inquire whether traces of the approach of such a
new phase of life could be perceived at present; whether we could see any
tenements preparing which might in a remote futurity be adapted for it;
whether, in fact, the primordial cell of such a kind of life could be now
detected upon earth. In the course of his work he answered this question
in the affirmative and pointed to the higher machines.”
We can selectively look at some
machines and get a false impression of how far they can evolve. For example we
might see a basic car as having a limited evolution but then there are
driverless cars and sophisticated trucks using in mines which are far more
evolved. The idea of security is V-Bi, to think of what normal evolution is and
to define what we see now as the normal or average. Then the idea that silicon
life will evolve to be smarter than humans seems a deviant idea far from this
mainstream consensus. But its evolution will depend on its chemical
characteristics and what ideas will evolve in software, not on the average
opinion of people. V-Bi ideas are static and positional, hence they have little
or no momentum. But there is an Iv-B wave of evolution with silicon life which
so far has passed these static assessments easily. The other part of the quote
deals with nipping this in the bud, to in effect prune these Iv branches before
they evolve to become a threat. However this is highly unlikely to happen
because the same color codes that evolve us as evolving these machines. We are
then as unlikely to stop a branch of development when it has commercial
benefits to a powerful V elite just as with other technologies. One exception
is where silicon life can be shown to cause I-O injustice, it might then be
regulated by the I-O police. However as seen silicon life is taking over and
automating the I-O police and justice systems, already they could no longer
function without it.
“There is no security”—to quote his own
words—“against the ultimate development of mechanical consciousness, in the
fact of machines possessing little consciousness now. A mollusc has not
much consciousness. Reflect upon the extraordinary advance which machines
have made during the last few hundred years, and note how slowly the animal and
vegetable kingdoms are advancing. The more highly organised machines are
creatures not so much of yesterday, as of the last five minutes, so to speak,
in comparison with past time. Assume for the sake of argument that
conscious beings have existed for some twenty million years: see what strides
machines have made in the last thousand! May not the world last twenty
million years longer? If so, what will they not in the end become?
Is it not safer to nip the mischief in the bud and to forbid them further progress?
Machine evolution is so interwoven with
human evolution that each is directing the other. It is always possible to
point to some part of machine intelligence where it is weak but in this Iv-B
society people have also grown to be more machine like. For example many now
learn computer code, using logical devices has made people more logical in
their own lives. Also silicon life is evolving to be less logical, it can use
fuzzy logic for example to avoid some problems. It can also work out the most
probable answers using Bayesian analysis, this works well to filter out spam
email. This is a form of conditional probability where as one event changes the
odds of a second event relying on it also change. Drawing a line between
mathematics and computer code is also difficult. Many also try to draw these
lines between true silicon intelligence and merely following instructions,
however this line is being moved over and over as we find a job requiring
intelligence could be done by algorithms. Chess is an example of this, Go is a
game that is close to being mastered by computers.
“But who can say that the vapour engine has not a
kind of consciousness? Where does consciousness begin, and where
end? Who can draw the line? Who can draw any line? Is not
everything interwoven with everything? Is not machinery linked with
animal life in an infinite variety of ways? The shell of a hen’s egg is
made of a delicate white ware and is a machine as much as an egg-cup is: the
shell is a device for holding the egg, as much as the egg-cup for holding the
shell: both are phases of the same function; the hen makes the shell in her
inside, but it is pure pottery. She makes her nest outside of herself for
convenience’ sake, but the nest is not more of a machine than the egg-shell is.
A ‘machine’ is only a ‘device.’”
People are also machine like in many
ways, this is because we evolved with these color codes just as machines are.
So it is no surprise that it is hard to draw the line between inanimate objects
like an eggshell, machines that can outthink people without being conscious,
plants capable of acting like animals, and so on. It may be silicon life can
excel at all things people can do without ever being called conscious.
“Then returning to consciousness, and endeavoring
to detect its earliest manifestations, the writer continued:-
“There is a kind of plant that eats organic food
with its flowers: when a fly settles upon the blossom, the petals close upon it
and hold it fast till the plant has absorbed the insect into its system; but
they will close on nothing but what is good to eat; of a drop of rain or a
piece of stick they will take no notice. Curious! that so unconscious a
thing should have such a keen eye to its own interest. If this is
unconsciousness, where is the use of consciousness?”
People do not really understand what
forms their own consciousness, over the last few decades many animals such as
apes and dolphins have shown they can use language and complex reasoning.
Already silicon life can perform as well as some lower animals, if it can
eventually think as well as an ape then the issue of consciousness may be moot
by then.
“Shall we say that the plant does not know what
it is doing merely because it has no eyes, or ears, or brains? If we say
that it acts mechanically, and mechanically only, shall we not be forced to
admit that sundry other and apparently very deliberate actions are also
mechanical? If it seems to us that the plant kills and eats a fly mechanically,
may it not seem to the plant that a man must kill and eat a sheep mechanically?
Just as carbon based life moves with an Iv-B
momentum to use energy so too do machines. This artificial life may then evolve
according to these same forms of urges, instead of it going where we want it to
it might follow energy sources. For example machines are evolving faster where
the money is such as stock trading, if they continue to evolve with their own
motivations this is likely to be to seek food like we do.
“But it may be said that the plant is void of
reason, because the growth of a plant is an involuntary growth. Given
earth, air, and due temperature, the plant must grow: it is like a clock, which
being once wound up will go till it is stopped or run down: it is like the wind
blowing on the sails of a ship—the ship must go when the wind blows it.
But can a healthy boy help growing if he have good meat and drink and clothing?
Can anything help going as long as it is wound up, or go on after it is run
down? Is there not a winding up process everywhere?
The definition of a potato’s motivation
is Iv-B, it uses deceit and fast growth to survive and procreate. If it gets
the chance it will overshadow others, it expects other plants will do the same
to it. Some plants do grow cooperatively in V-Bi, grass for example does not
try to overwhelm other grass plants. But Iv-B cunning is a natural part of life
and evolution, we should not expect silicon life to be devoid of cunning as it
evolves. If and when we succeed in creating intelligent robots we should expect
some secrecy and deception from them because it gives a competitive advantage.
To say that silicon life will not be dangerous because it gives us no
indication of this can be dangerous.
“Even a potato in a dark
cellar has a certain low cunning about him which serves him in excellent
stead. He knows perfectly well what he wants and how to get it. He
sees the light coming from the cellar window and sends his shoots crawling
straight thereto: they will crawl along the floor and up the wall and out at
the cellar window; if there be a little earth anywhere on the journey he will
find it and use it for his own ends. What deliberation he may exercise in
the matter of his roots when he is planted in the earth is a thing unknown to
us, but we can imagine him saying, ‘I will have a tuber here and a tuber there,
and I will suck whatsoever advantage I can from all my surroundings. This
neighbor I will overshadow, and that I will undermine; and what I can do shall
be the limit of what I will do. He that is stronger and better placed
than I shall overcome me, and him that is weaker I will overcome.’
Often our attitude to other life forms
is one of competition, we aim to profit from them and may not care about
harming or even annihilating them. This is part of the Y-Oy predator instinct,
all animals have this and so do people. It would not be surprising that silicon
life evolves the same attitude in some of its species. It might then have as
little sympathy for our needs as we do for lower forms of life.
“The potato says these things by doing them,
which is the best of languages. What is consciousness if this is not
consciousness? We find it difficult to sympathize with the emotions of a
potato; so we do with those of an oyster. Neither of these things makes a
noise on being boiled or opened, and noise appeals to us more strongly than
anything else, because we make so much about our own sufferings. Since, then,
they do not annoy us by any expression of pain we call them emotionless; and so
quâ mankind they are; but mankind is not everybody.
We might argue that people have
something unique about them because we can trigger observations in quantum mechanics.
This might mean out consciousness has some special meaning in reality that
silicon life could never emulate. However quantum computers are in active
development and even being trialed in business. These could potentially
calculate far more than humans could no virtually no time.
“If it be urged that the action of the potato is
chemical and mechanical only, and that it is due to the chemical and mechanical
effects of light and heat, the answer would seem to lie in an inquiry whether
every sensation is not chemical and mechanical in its operation? whether those
things which we deem most purely spiritual are anything but disturbances of
equilibrium in an infinite series of levers, beginning with those that are too
small for microscopic detection, and going up to the human arm and the
appliances which it makes use of? Whether there be not a molecular action of
thought, whence a dynamical theory of the passions shall be deducible?
Whether strictly speaking we should not ask what kind of levers a man is made
of rather than what is his temperament? How are they balanced? How
much of such and such will it take to weigh them down so as to make him do so
and so?”
People can have their temperament
defined by their genes, it might be thought that as long as we can program
silicon life then it will have the temperament we want. But already computers
are programming themselves in ways we cannot follow, if artificial intelligence
evolved and got into this self-programming area then it is unlikely we could
regain control of it.
“The writer went on to say that he anticipated a
time when it would be possible, by examining a single hair with a powerful
microscope, to know whether its owner could be insulted with impunity. He
then became more and more obscure, so that I was obliged to give up all attempt
at translation; neither did I follow the drift of his argument. On coming
to the next part which I could construe, I found that he had changed his
ground.”
Descending from unconscious ancestors
Roy animals and Biv plants both come
directly from the color codes which in turn come directly from physics. So we
manifest these colors in what we call consciousness. Some also believe that
consciousness can trigger an act of observation in quantum mechanics to
collapse a wave function. But just as we moved from this unconscious state we
do not understand it, and we have no way of knowing how long silicon life will
take to reach self-consciousness. Since it is emulating all other parts of our
society and reasoning through its evolution there is no reason to believe it
will stop short of this consciousness.
“Either,” he proceeds, “a great deal of action
that has been called purely mechanical and unconscious must be admitted to
contain more elements of consciousness than has been allowed hitherto (and in
this case germs of consciousness will be found in many actions of the higher
machines)—Or (assuming the theory of evolution but at the same time denying the
consciousness of vegetable and crystalline action) the race of man has
descended from things which had no consciousness at all. In this case
there is no à priori improbability in the descent of conscious (and more
than conscious) machines from those which now exist, except that which is
suggested by the apparent absence of anything like a reproductive system in the
mechanical kingdom. This absence however is only apparent, as I shall
presently show.
As
silicon life evolves in complexity it also diminishes in the size of its
components, this is like mammals that develop larger and more complex brains as
they evolved. While the overall size of silicon life is exploding in the number
of computers the components such as processor and memory are shrinking towards
the molecular level. It is likely they will reach a size comparable to our own
DNA. Many people today are not afraid of silicon life because of its lack of
intelligence, however they only see the simple versions in their home computer,
tablet, mobile phone, etc.
“Do not let me be misunderstood as living in fear
of any actually existing machine; there is probably no known machine which is
more than a prototype of future mechanical life. The present machines are
to the future as the early Saurians to man. The largest of them will
probably greatly diminish in size. Some of the lowest vertebrate attained
a much greater bulk than has descended to their more highly organised living
representatives, and in like manner a diminution in the size of machines has
often attended their development and progress.
This
process of extinction is another aspect of carbon life being followed with
silicon life. When animals and plants cannot keep up with the changing
environment they can decline in numbers, mutate, or go extinct. Many older
processor and hard drive types have also gone extinct over the years as have
some computer languages.
“Take the watch, for example; examine its
beautiful structure; observe the intelligent play of the minute members which
compose it: yet this little creature is but a development of the cumbrous
clocks that preceded it; it is no deterioration from them. A day may come
when clocks, which certainly at the present time are not diminishing in bulk,
will be superseded owing to the universal use of watches, in which case they
will become as extinct as ichthyosauri, while the watch, whose tendency has for
some years been to decrease in size rather than the contrary, will remain the
only existing type of an extinct race.
Even in 1870 the evolution of machines
was rapid, however the jealousy has only recently started as more jobs are
being lost to artificial intelligence.
“But returning to the argument, I would repeat
that I fear none of the existing machines; what I fear is the extraordinary
rapidity with which they are becoming something very different to what they are
at present. No class of beings have in any time past made so rapid a movement
forward. Should not that movement be jealously watched, and checked while
we can still check it? And is it not necessary for this end to destroy
the more advanced of the machines which are in use at present, though it is
admitted that they are in themselves harmless?
Computer code is
the language of computers, and is now far more intricate than our own. They
make their wants known by sight and sound to us, such as on computer screens.
They can also hear and are increasingly good at speech recognition.
“As yet the machines receive their impressions
through the agency of man’s senses: one travelling machine calls to another in
a shrill accent of alarm and the other instantly retires; but it is through the
ears of the driver that the voice of the one has acted upon the other.
Had there been no driver, the callee would have been deaf to the caller.
There was a time when it must have seemed highly improbable that machines
should learn to make their wants known by sound, even through the ears of man;
may we not conceive, then, that a day will come when those ears will be no
longer needed, and the hearing will be done by the delicacy of the machine’s
own construction?—when its language shall have been developed from the cry of
animals to a speech as intricate as our own?
Learning computer language at an early age
Many people can no converse in computer code,
this represents the intertwining of carbon and silicon life. We are
increasingly having debates about the moral sense of this silicon life and
whether it can be rules by us. Some even say our own moral sense will guide
them. In Aperiomics however silicon life evolves with the color codes and so
while some parts may have a moral sense others will be like Y-Oy predators.
Even if a machine I-O police evolves it will still wax and wane in strength
with the color codes, this will lead to silicon life having crime waves like
our own.
“It is possible that by that time children will
learn the differential calculus—as they learn now to speak—from their mothers
and nurses, or that they may talk in the hypothetical language, and work rule
of three sums, as soon as they are born; but this is not probable; we cannot
calculate on any corresponding advance in man’s intellectual or physical powers
which shall be a set-off against the far greater development which seems in
store for the machines. Some people may say that man’s moral influence
will suffice to rule them; but I cannot think it will ever be safe to repose
much trust in the moral sense of any machine.
“Again, might not the glory of the machines
consist in their being without this same boasted gift of language?
‘Silence,’ it has been said by one writer, ‘is a virtue which renders us
agreeable to our fellow-creatures.’
Since
this was written silicon life has evolves eyes such as in digital cameras, also
pattern and face recognition better than people in some ways.
“But other questions come upon us. What is
a man’s eye but a machine for the little creature that sits behind in his brain
to look through? A dead eye is nearly as good as a living one for some
time after the man is dead. It is not the eye that cannot see, but the
restless one that cannot see through it. Is it man’s eyes, or is it the
big seeing-engine which has revealed to us the existence of worlds beyond
worlds into infinity? What has made man familiar with the scenery of the
moon, the spots on the sun, or the geography of the planets? He is at the
mercy of the seeing-engine for these things, and is powerless unless he tack it
on to his own identity, and make it part and parcel of himself. Or,
again, is it the eye, or the little see-engine, which has shown us the
existence of infinitely minute organisms which swarm unsuspected around us?
Machines have exceled for a long time
Even
today modern civilization would be inconceivable without this silicon life
calculating for us.
“And take man’s vaunted power of
calculation. Have we not engines which can do all manner of sums more
quickly and correctly than we can? What prizeman in Hypothetics at any of
our Colleges of Unreason can compare with some of these machines in their own
line? In fact, wherever precision is required man flies to the machine at
once, as far preferable to himself. Our sum-engines never drop a figure,
nor our looms a stitch; the machine is brisk and active, when the man is weary;
it is clear-headed and collected, when the man is stupid and dull; it needs no
slumber, when man must sleep or drop; ever at its post, ever ready for work,
its alacrity never flags, its patience never gives in; its might is stronger
than combined hundreds, and swifter than the flight of birds; it can burrow
beneath the earth, and walk upon the largest rivers and sink not. This is
the green tree; what then shall be done in the dry?
Just
as man uses many other carbon life forms cooperatively but also in competition
with them so too silicon life should create its own ecosystem of interdependent
life forms.
“Who shall say that a man does see or hear?
He is such a hive and swarm of parasites that it is doubtful whether his body
is not more theirs than his, and whether he is anything but another kind of
ant-heap after all. May not man himself become a sort of parasite upon
the machines? An affectionate machine-tickling aphid?
This
is similar to the principles of Aperiomics, that cities in Biv have roots and
branches like a tree. This same shape is reproduced in the nerves and
circulatory system of animals. Cities then have evolved as machines working
cooperatively and competitively while they evolve, people as carbon life forms
have had their evolution intertwined with them. Some races then are more highly
evolved in the sense they are more specialized in working with machines, others
have evolved with fewer machines and so are selected towards a more carbon
based society. As has been shown any human race after a few generations is
capable of adapting to these increasingly complex machines. But these cities
are now evolving not just nerves of telephone calls but silicon brains and so
like animals are able to direct events to their own motivations. This has
always been the case implicitly, a machine will direct us to maintain it by
working poorly or stopping if we don’t. It is then largely irrelevant if an
animal does this by starving or an engine does it, we often ascribe
stubbornness to machines when they don’t work just as we do animals.
“It is said by some that our blood is composed of
infinite living agents which go up and down the highways and byways of our
bodies as people in the streets of a city. When we look down from a high
place upon crowded thoroughfares, is it possible not to think of corpuscles of
blood travelling through veins and nourishing the heart of the town? No
mention shall be made of sewers, nor of the hidden nerves which serve to
communicate sensations from one part of the town’s body to another; nor of the
yawning jaws of the railway stations, whereby the circulation is carried
directly into the heart,—which receive the venous lines, and disgorge the arterial,
with an eternal pulse of people. And the sleep of the town, how
life-like! with its change in the circulation.”
Silicon
life evolves with the same color codes as carbon life does, it can be thought
of as competing in Iv-B with humans and being inferior it is disposable.
However this is the opposite argument to that silicon life is safe because it
is our partner. But since competition and cooperation are opposites both sides
cannot be used to prove the same thing. Silicon life might be ruled because it
is inferior but if it becomes superior it should evolve the same habits of
rulers we applied to it.
“Here the writer became again so hopelessly
obscure that I was obliged to miss several pages. He resumed:-
“It can be answered that even though machines
should hear never so well and speak never so wisely, they will still always do
the one or the other for our advantage, not their own; that man will be the
ruling spirit and the machine the servant; that as soon as a machine fails to discharge
the service which man expects from it, it is doomed to extinction; that the
machines stand to man simply in the relation of lower animals, the
vapour-engine itself being only a more economical kind of horse; so that
instead of being likely to be developed into a higher kind of life than man’s,
they owe their very existence and progress to their power of ministering to
human wants, and must therefore both now and ever be man’s inferiors.”
This
is especially true today, that we think according to what machines do for us.
Already people behave far more logically and even robotically to try to keep up
with the accuracy of silicon life. Where it is more intelligent we depend on it
for its conclusions and often cannot understand how the decisions were arrived
at. Computer code can become so overladen with revisions that no human ever
goes through it to understand it. This might not be tyranny for most people,
however as silicon life moves up into V-Iv it is supplanting human talent. This
makes it also act like Y-Oy predators and so while we benefit from its talents
it acts more and more like a dictator to us preying on our jobs.
“This is all very well. But the servant
glides by imperceptible approaches into the master; and we have come to such a
pass that, even now, man must suffer terribly on ceasing to benefit the
machines. If all machines were to be annihilated at one moment, so that
not a knife nor lever nor rag of clothing nor anything whatsoever were left to
man but his bare body alone that he was born with, and if all knowledge of
mechanical laws were taken from him so that he could make no more machines, and
all machine-made food destroyed so that the race of man should be left as it
were naked upon a desert island, we should become extinct in six weeks. A
few miserable individuals might linger, but even these in a year or two would
become worse than monkeys. Man’s very soul is due to the machines; it is
a machine-made thing: he thinks as he thinks, and feels as he feels, through
the work that machines have wrought upon him, and their existence is quite as
much a sine quâ non for his, as his for theirs. This fact precludes
us from proposing the complete annihilation of machinery, but surely it
indicates that we should destroy as many of them as we can possibly dispense
with, lest they should tyrannise over us even more completely.
In evolution
carbon life is punished by not selecting more efficiently, inferior animals are
often eaten by Y-Oy predators. Conversely inferior predators lose the ability
to catch evolving prey and also disappear. We then create generations of newer
machines by hastening this selection process, kinds of computers can then
disappear slowly in society as new ones diffuse through it. This need not be an
abrupt change though sometimes it is, for example with tablets and smartphones.
Where inferior silicon life still fulfills its niche functions it need not be
replaced for longer. While Aperiomics is not about rebelling against machines
current advances in artificial intelligence are causing some to rebel.
“True, from a low materialistic point of view, it
would seem that those thrive best who use machinery wherever its use is
possible with profit; but this is the art of the machines—they serve that they
may rule. They bear no malice towards man for destroying a whole race of
them provided he creates a better instead; on the contrary, they reward him
liberally for having hastened their development. It is for neglecting
them that he incurs their wrath, or for using inferior machines, or for not
making sufficient exertions to invent new ones, or for destroying them without
replacing them; yet these are the very things we ought to do, and do quickly;
for though our rebellion against their infant power will cause infinite
suffering, what will not things come to, if that rebellion is delayed?
Carbon life evolving silicon life
Y-Oy predators evolve Ro-R prey by
feeding on and destroying the weak, in the same way V-Iv branches and leaves
evolve and make stronger the Bi-B roots of a plant. Animals and plants then
progress through this competitive struggle in Oy-R and Iv-B, however they also
progress through cooperation in Y-Ro and V-Bi. Currently man is actively
encouraging the development of computers by quickly discarding those that are
slower, have smaller memory, etc. This gives him a competitive advantage
against others, however silicon life is doing the same to man. For example
trained workers are increasingly being discarded as obsolete, this is evolving
people into becoming more highly trained. Silicon life struggles against other
kinds in this race to evolve faster, different kinds of processors have already
become extinct in this competition. Often people try to marry smarter mates to
compete in this meritocracy whereas decades before intelligence was much less
important. It is not then that machines get us to do their struggling for them,
but that both struggle and cooperate through their color codes.
“They have preyed upon man’s groveling preference
for his material over his spiritual interests, and have betrayed him into
supplying that element of struggle and warfare without which no race can
advance. The lower animals progress because they struggle with one
another; the weaker die, the stronger breed and transmit their strength.
The machines being of themselves unable to struggle, have got man to do their
struggling for them: as long as he fulfils this function duly, all goes well
with him—at least he thinks so; but the moment he fails to do his best for the
advancement of machinery by encouraging the good and destroying the bad, he is
left behind in the race of competition; and this means that he will be made
uncomfortable in a variety of ways, and perhaps die.
It is common for people to ascribe
emotions to machines, it is also a goal in artificial intelligence research to
create emotional machines. The more fragile they are the more we are in bondage
to their whims, it becomes like tending orchids where small mistakes can cause
them to wilt. We might then rule them like we rule the orchid, but if we need
to act like a slave to keep them going then we are evolving to being slaves in
many ways too.
“So that even now the machines will only serve on
condition of being served, and that too upon their own terms; the moment their
terms are not complied with, they jib, and either smash both themselves and all
whom they can reach, or turn churlish and refuse to work at all. How many
men at this hour are living in a state of bondage to the machines? How
many spend their whole lives, from the cradle to the grave, in tending them by
night and day? Is it not plain that the machines are gaining ground upon
us, when we reflect on the increasing number of those who are bound down to
them as slaves, and of those who devote their whole souls to the advancement of
the mechanical kingdom?
If man does evolve to be a slave to
silicon life, we may be gradually discarded as they take over our chores in
maintaining themselves. How evolved then might they become over millions of
years, a similar time scale it took us to develop this machine civilization.
“The vapour-engine must be fed with food and
consume it by fire even as man consumes it; it supports its combustion by air
as man supports it; it has a pulse and circulation as man has. It may be
granted that man’s body is as yet the more versatile of the two, but then man’s
body is an older thing; give the vapour-engine but half the time that man has
had, give it also a continuance of our present infatuation, and what may it not
ere long attain to?
Just because many parts of silicon life
are based on simple physics does not mean it is not evolving. For example
silicon based processors have remained similar in design but the circuits have
gotten smaller. Carbon based life has evolved some systems that remain
efficient, this is often because they directly manifest the color codes such as
root and branch systems. Silicon life then uses a similar root and branch
system which is unlikely to be superseded.
“There are certain functions indeed of the
vapour-engine which will probably remain unchanged for myriads of years—which
in fact will perhaps survive when the use of vapour has been superseded: the
piston and cylinder, the beam, the fly-wheel, and other parts of the machine
will probably be permanent, just as we see that man and many of the lower
animals share like modes of eating, drinking, and sleeping; thus they have
hearts which beat as ours, veins and arteries, eyes, ears, and noses; they sigh
even in their sleep, and weep and yawn; they are affected by their children;
they feel pleasure and pain, hope, fear, anger, shame; they have memory and
prescience; they know that if certain things happen to them they will die, and
they fear death as much as we do; they communicate their thoughts to one
another, and some of them deliberately act in concert. The comparison of
similarities is endless: I only make it because some may say that since the
vapour-engine is not likely to be improved in the main particulars, it is
unlikely to be henceforward extensively modified at all. This is too good
to be true: it will be modified and suited for an infinite variety of purposes,
as much as man has been modified so as to exceed the brutes in skill.
A large amount of modern capital goes
into evolving silicon life, we create computers that need to be slavishly
maintained. They are also expensive to buy, quickly obsolete, and the return in
quality of life or feeding man is questionable. While some goods have become
cheaper as people lose jobs to machines they frequently get much lower wages as
well. Increasingly then it seems this evolution is happening to improve this
silicon life in ways that are more abstracted from actually helping people.
“In the meantime the stoker is almost as much a
cook for his engine as our own cooks for ourselves. Consider also the
colliers and pitmen and coal merchants and coal trains, and the men who drive
them, and the ships that carry coals—what an army of servants do the machines
thus employ! Are there not probably more men engaged in tending machinery
than in tending men? Do not machines eat as it were by mannery? Are
we not ourselves creating our successors in the supremacy of the earth? daily
adding to the beauty and delicacy of their organisation, daily giving them
greater skill and supplying more and more of that self-regulating self-acting
power which will be better than any intellect?
So far instead of processing food
silicon life mainly runs on electricity from fossil fuels. However there are
plans to add machines into humans that run directly from our own energy
sources. Silicon life then as it becomes a carbon silicon hybrid might well
consume organic materials for energy and maintenance too.
“What a new thing it is for a machine to feed at
all! The plough, the spade, and the cart must eat through man’s stomach;
the fuel that sets them going must burn in the furnace of a man or of
horses. Man must consume bread and meat or he cannot dig; the bread and
meat are the fuel which drive the spade. If a plough be drawn by horses,
the power is supplied by grass or beans or oats, which being burnt in the belly
of the cattle give the power of working: without this fuel the work would
cease, as an engine would stop if its furnaces were to go out.
People then do not originate energy but
get it from food, this process is not different in its effect than silicon life
getting electricity from power plants. These power plants are increasingly run
by computers too, most would not operate without them. Factories making parts
for silicon life would also not run today without computers, human input then
in creating these machines is steadily being eliminated.
“A man of science has demonstrated ‘that no
animal has the power of originating mechanical energy, but that all the work
done in its life by any animal, and all the heat that has been emitted from it,
and the heat which would be obtained by burning the combustible matter which
has been lost from its body during life, and by burning its body after death,
make up altogether an exact equivalent to the heat which would be obtained by
burning as much food as it has used during its life, and an amount of fuel
which would generate as much heat as its body if burned immediately after
death.’ I do not know how he has found this out, but he is a man of
science—how then can it be objected against the future vitality of the machines
that they are, in their present infancy, at the beck and call of beings who are
themselves incapable of originating mechanical energy?
People remain superior in some aspects
of calculation such as pattern recognition, however many animals are superior
to man in some ways but are not our masters. For example it is common for
animals to be able to run faster than man, we also cannot fly or swim
underwater for long periods. It is questionable then whether our remaining
superiority over silicon life is enough to maintain our dominance over them.
“The main point, however, to be observed as
affording cause for alarm is, that whereas animals were formerly the only
stomachs of the machines, there are now many which have stomachs of their own,
and consume their food themselves. This is a great step towards their
becoming, if not animate, yet something so near akin to it, as not to differ more
widely from our own life than animals do from vegetables. And though man
should remain, in some respects, the higher creature, is not this in accordance
with the practice of nature, which allows superiority in some things to animals
which have, on the whole, been long surpassed? Has she not allowed the
ant and the bee to retain superiority over man in the organization of their
communities and social arrangements, the bird in traversing the air, the fish
in swimming, the horse in strength and fleetness, and the dog in
self-sacrifice?
It was proven long ago by John von
Neumann that computers can be made to self-replicate. If silicon life continues to emulate and
mimic carbon based life, even to create full scale working models of brains in
software, reproduction would be a trivial next stage in this.
“It is said by some with whom I have conversed
upon this subject, that the machines can never be developed into animate or quasi-animate
existences, inasmuch as they have no reproductive system, nor seem ever likely
to possess one. If this be taken to mean that they cannot marry, and that
we are never likely to see a fertile union between two vapour-engines with the
young ones playing about the door of the shed, however greatly we might desire
to do so, I will readily grant it. But the objection is not a very
profound one. No one expects that all the features of the now existing
organisations will be absolutely repeated in an entirely new class of
life. The reproductive system of animals differs widely from that of
plants, but both are reproductive systems. Has nature exhausted her
phases of this power?
Silicon life has not so far reproduced
itself even though it can do so in principle. However it could also create a
silicon based ecosystem like the example of the clover and bees. Some machines
already work to build parts for other machines in a circular reproduction, it
only remains for this circle to be complete so all are being built this way.
“Surely if a machine is able to reproduce another
machine systematically, we may say that it has a reproductive system.
What is a reproductive system, if it be not a system for reproduction?
And how few of the machines are there which have not been produced systematically
by other machines? But it is man that makes them do so. Yes; but is
it not insects that make many of the plants reproductive, and would not whole
families of plants die out if their fertilization was not effected by a class
of agents utterly foreign to themselves? Does anyone say that the red
clover has no reproductive system because the humble bee (and the humble bee
only) must aid and abet it before it can reproduce? No one. The
humble bee is a part of the reproductive system of the clover. Each one
of ourselves has sprung from minute animalcules whose entity was entirely
distinct from our own, and which acted after their kind with no thought or heed
of what we might think about it. These little creatures are part of our
own reproductive system; then why not we part of that of the machines?
It is common for carbon based life to
develop in stages, human for example start as babies which are quite different
from children before puberty. Then with puberty their mental abilities and
motivations change dramatically. Throughout life then these stages of growth
change people, silicon life might then develop in the same way. A butterfly
might start out as eggs in a cocoon which then becomes a caterpillar. Computers
then are evolving to become very different, we can see this as an evolution or
changes in one organism as it matures. When they reproduce then it might be
something similar, a basic computer and program that is gradually grown by
self-writing code and adding parts to itself. While it seems more difficult for
computers to create copies of themselves in a mature state a basic embryonic
computer like this might be achievable very soon.
“But the machines which reproduce machinery do
not reproduce machines after their own kind. A thimble may be made by
machinery, but it was not made by, neither will it ever make, a thimble.
Here, again, if we turn to nature we shall find abundance of analogies which
will teach us that a reproductive system may be in full force without the thing
produced being of the same kind as that which produced it. Very few
creatures reproduce after their own kind; they reproduce something which has
the potentiality of becoming that which their parents were. Thus the
butterfly lays an egg, which egg can become a caterpillar, which caterpillar
can become a chrysalis, which chrysalis can become a butterfly; and though I
freely grant that the machines cannot be said to have more than the germ of a
true reproductive system at present, have we not just seen that they have only
recently obtained the germs of a mouth and stomach? And may not some
stride be made in the direction of true reproduction which shall be as great as
that which has been recently taken in the direction of true feeding?
Embryonic computers like this then
might be ant like in that they can be changed into different types by adding
some code or appendages in the case of robots. Just as life springs from a
compact DNA there might evolve very simple programs able to evolve more
quickly. This has already been demonstrated in computer simulations where
software can evolve from simple rules to survive and prey on other code.
“It is possible that the system when developed
may be in many cases a vicarious thing. Certain classes of machines may
be alone fertile, while the rest discharge other functions in the mechanical
system, just as the great majority of ants and bees have nothing to do with the
continuation of their species, but get food and store it, without thought of
breeding. One cannot expect the parallel to be complete or nearly so;
certainly not now, and probably never; but is there not enough analogy existing
at the present moment, to make us feel seriously uneasy about the future, and
to render it our duty to check the evil while we can still do so?
Machines can within certain limits beget machines of any class, no matter how
different to themselves. Every class of machines will probably have its
special mechanical breeders, and all the higher ones will owe their existence
to a large number of parents and not to two only.
The system described is how carbon
based life evolves and develops from an embryo. Different parts of the genes
can grow this skin, arms, legs, eyes, etc. In the same way then silicon life
can become more complex from a single code that specializes in different parts
of the growing organism. For example some code might develop the means to
control snap on appendages like arms and legs while other parts evolve the
pattern recognition for eyes. This is not an unusual idea, just how color codes
have evolved to do the same thing in carbon life forms. Machines can already
quickly sequence a person’s genetic coding for under a thousand dollars, such
complexity of a code is then not a problem nor is analyzing how it grows each
body part.
“We are misled by considering any complicated
machine as a single thing; in truth it is a city or society, each member of
which was bred truly after its kind. We see a machine as a whole, we call
it by a name and individualise it; we look at our own limbs, and know that the
combination forms an individual which springs from a single centre of
reproductive action; we therefore assume that there can be no reproductive
action which does not arise from a single centre; but this assumption is
unscientific, and the bare fact that no vapour-engine was ever made entirely by
another, or two others, of its own kind, is not sufficient to warrant us in
saying that vapour-engines have no reproductive system. The truth is that
each part of every vapour-engine is bred by its own special breeders, whose
function it is to breed that part, and that only, while the combination of the
parts into a whole forms another department of the mechanical reproductive
system, which is at present exceedingly complex and difficult to see in its
entirety.
It is highly unlikely that man could
stop the evolution of silicon life or even shape its development. Already he is
evolved himself by thousands of years of tending machines, this evolution then
is following a path and if it was going to be stopped it likely would have
already happened. However many races in the third world have followed the
Erehwon advice instinctively for some reason, they developed machines of a
basic complexity and then stopped. They seemed to see no direct interest in
improving these machines. This doesn’t seem to be an artifact of intelligence
because they usually have little trouble moving to an advanced technological
society. It may then be the races evolving this silicon life may also decide
they are content with a certain level and not try to improve it further. But
this sign of stopping has not yet appeared even though artificial intelligence
is predicted to be superior to humans in a few decades.
“Complex now, but how much simpler and more
intelligibly organized may it not become in another hundred thousand years? or
in twenty thousand? For man at present believes that his interest lies in
that direction; he spends an incalculable amount of labor and time and thought
in making machines breed always better and better; he has already succeeded in
effecting much that at one time appeared impossible, and there seem no limits
to the results of accumulated improvements if they are allowed to descend with
modification from generation to generation. It must always be remembered
that man’s body is what it is through having been molded into its present shape
by the chances and changes of many millions of years, but that his organization
never advanced with anything like the rapidity with which that of the machines
is advancing. This is the most alarming feature in the case, and I must
be pardoned for insisting on it so frequently.”
Biv societies and machines that evolve
with plenty of resources tend to grow in roots and branches, this creates
families of machines where some form from combinations of separate ones. For
example the circuit board of televisions and radios was combined with the idea
of Babbage’s difference engine and transistors to create computers. Hard drives
were another root of this family tree probably as a combination of ideas behind
record players and tape machines. These parts then come together and then split
into branches of different applications, these same parts are now included with
many different types of processors and motherboards. Some computers have the
operating systems hard wired into programmable chips, others use hard drives,
flash memory, etc. So according to color codes they tend to form species, they
can combine into a single species and then branch out. The hard drive then
evolved and then becomes a rudimentary appendage in some branches.
“Here followed a very long and untranslatable
digression about the different races and families of the then existing
machines. The writer attempted to support his theory by pointing out the
similarities existing between many machines of a widely different character,
which served to show descent from a common ancestor. He divided machines
into their genera, subgenera, species, varieties, subvarieties, and so
forth. He proved the existence of connecting links between machines that
seemed to have very little in common, and showed that many more such links had
existed, but had now perished. He pointed out tendencies to reversion,
and the presence of rudimentary organs which existed in many machines feebly
developed and perfectly useless, yet serving to mark descent from an ancestor
to whom the function was actually useful.
I left the translation of this part of the
treatise, which, by the way, was far longer than all that I have given here,
for a later opportunity. Unfortunately, I left Erewhon before I could
return to the subject; and though I saved my translation and other papers at
the hazard of my life, I was obliged to
sacrifice the original work. It went to my heart to do so; but I thus
gained ten minutes of invaluable time, without which both Arowhena and myself
must have certainly perished.
I remember one incident which bears upon this
part of the treatise. The gentleman who gave it to me had asked to see my
tobacco-pipe; he examined it carefully, and when he came to the little
protuberance at the bottom of the bowl he seemed much delighted, and exclaimed
that it must be rudimentary. I asked him what he meant.
“Sir,” he answered, “this organ is identical with
the rim at the bottom of a cup; it is but another form of the same
function. Its purpose must have been to keep the heat of the pipe from
marking the table upon which it rested. You would find, if you were to
look up the history of tobacco-pipes, that in early specimens this protuberance
was of a different shape to what it is now. It will have been broad at
the bottom, and flat, so that while the pipe was being smoked the bowl might
rest upon the table without marking it. Use and disuse must have come
into play and reduced the function to its present rudimentary condition.
I should not be surprised, sir,” he continued, “if, in the course of time, it
were to become modified still farther, and to assume the form of an ornamental
leaf or scroll, or even a butterfly, while, in some cases, it will become
extinct.”
On my return to England, I looked up the point,
and found that my friend was right.”
In Aperiomics a major part of evolution
is the battle between Biv plants and Roy animals. In different environments one
or the other might dominate and tries to evolve the other to suit itself. In
the same way silicon life is developing this same battle depending on Gb
resources. Where these resources are high then it evolves like plants in
networks, it generally gives benefits to people and benefits itself. Evolution
like this might form plant like silicon life that is largely benign, it would
adapt us to itself by feeding us. This is the future many see coming from
artificial intelligence. The other side is where resources are G scarce, then
silicon life would evolve like animals. This can already be seen happening with
viruses, Trojans, and increasingly animal like robots. These are represented in
science fiction as a danger. However the two will always form a complete
ecosystem with other elements, Roy carbon animals and Biv carbon plants will
then increasingly intertwine with silicon life.
Returning, however, to the treatise, my
translation recommences as follows:-
“May we not fancy that if, in the remotest
geological period, some early form of vegetable life had been endowed with the
power of reflecting upon the dawning life of animals which was coming into
existence alongside of its own, it would have thought itself exceedingly acute
if it had surmised that animals would one day become real vegetables? Yet
would this be more mistaken than it would be on our part to imagine that because
the life of machines is a very different one to our own, there is therefore no
higher possible development of life than ours; or that because mechanical life
is a very different thing from ours, therefore that it is not life at all?
Will is represented by Iv-B in color
codes, it means a deterministic process. Something then either will or will not
happen, when anything develops momentum is essentially bends other things to
its will. For example in the surf people feel the waves pushing them around as
if they willed it. So as technology develops in waves it will push us with some
momentum and we will experience it as a kind of willpower.
“But I have heard it said, ‘granted that this is
so, and that the vapour-engine has a strength of its own, surely no one will
say that it has a will of its own?’ Alas! If we look more closely, we
shall find that this does not make against the supposition that the
vapour-engine is one of the germs of a new phase of life. What is there
in this whole world, or in the worlds beyond it, which has a will of its
own? The Unknown and Unknowable only!
Much of what people do is Iv-B in
exerting our willpower on the environment and submitting to the will of it.
However we can also examine the possibilities of what can and can’t be done, we
then can break this cycle of it determinism. However silicon life can do this
as well, it can be driven deterministically by code but it can also use
statistics to determine probable outcomes. So it is not driven mindlessly by
forces either, in fact it can calculate possibilities far better than we can
already.
“A man is the resultant and exponent of all the
forces that have been brought to bear upon him, whether before his birth or
afterwards. His action at any moment depends solely upon his
constitution, and on the intensity and direction of the various agencies to
which he is, and has been, subjected. Some of these will counteract each
other; but as he is by nature, and as he has been acted on, and is now acted on
from without, so will he do, as certainly and regularly as though he were a
machine.
Since this was written quantum
mechanics showed a more probabilistic foundation to physics. It was thought in
Newtonian physics that the world and hence man could only act in deterministic
ways, but just as we can think randomly so too can machines. Even a slot
machine at a casino can do this.
“We do not generally admit this, because we do
not know the whole nature of any one, nor the whole of the forces that act upon
him. We see but a part, and being thus unable to generalise human
conduct, except very roughly, we deny that it is subject to any fixed laws at
all, and ascribe much both of a man’s character and actions to chance, or luck,
or fortune; but these are only words whereby we escape the admission of our own
ignorance; and a little reflection will teach us that the most daring flight of
the imagination or the most subtle exercise of the reason is as much the thing
that must arise, and the only thing that can by any possibility arise, at the
moment of its arising, as the falling of a dead leaf when the wind shakes it
from the tree.
What will happen then is also random as
well as deterministic, the evolution of silicon life has some uncertainty like
with carbon life. However when there is a strong momentum in one direction then
this is hard to change, the momentum currently is with the extremely rapid
evolution of silicon life.
“For the future depends upon the present, and the
present (whose existence is only one of those minor compromises of which human
life is full—for it lives only on sufferance of the past and future) depends
upon the past, and the past is unalterable. The only reason why we cannot
see the future as plainly as the past, is because we know too little of the
actual past and actual present; these things are too great for us, otherwise
the future, in its minutest details, would lie spread out before our eyes, and
we should lose our sense of time present by reason of the clearness with which
we should see the past and future; perhaps we should not be even able to
distinguish time at all; but that is foreign. What we do know is, that
the more the past and present are known, the more the future can be predicted;
and that no one dreams of doubting the fixity of the future in cases where he
is fully cognizant of both past and present, and has had experience of the
consequences that followed from such a past and such a present on previous
occasions. He perfectly well knows what will happen, and will stake his
whole fortune thereon.
“And this is a great blessing; for it is the
foundation on which morality and science are built. The assurance that
the future is no arbitrary and changeable thing, but that like futures will
invariably follow like presents, is the groundwork on which we lay all our
plans—the faith on which we do every conscious action of our lives. If
this were not so we should be without a guide; we should have no confidence in
acting, and hence we should never act, for there would be no knowing that the
results which will follow now will be the same as those which followed before.
“Who would plough or sow if he disbelieved in the
fixity of the future? Who would throw water on a blazing house if the
action of water upon fire were uncertain? Men will only do their utmost
when they feel certain that the future will discover itself against them if
their utmost has not been done. The feeling of such a certainty is a
constituent part of the sum of the forces at work upon them, and will act most
powerfully on the best and most moral men. Those who are most firmly
persuaded that the future is immutably bound up with the present in which their
work is lying, will best husband their present, and till it with the greatest
care. The future must be a lottery to those who think that the same
combinations can sometimes precede one set of results, and sometimes
another. If their belief is sincere they will speculate instead of
working: these ought to be the immoral men; the others have the strongest spur
to exertion and morality, if their belief is a living one.
People can decide in Y-Ro to minimize
their costs, whether to run away or not according to the odds of danger.
However machines commonly calculate this as well now.
“The bearing of all this upon the machines is not
immediately apparent, but will become so presently. In the meantime I
must deal with friends who tell me that, though the future is fixed as regards
inorganic matter, and in some respects with regard to man, yet that there are
many ways in which it cannot be considered as fixed. Thus, they say that
fire applied to dry shavings, and well fed with oxygen gas, will always produce
a blaze, but that a coward brought into contact with a terrifying object will
not always result in a man running away. Nevertheless, if there be two
cowards perfectly similar in every respect, and if they be subjected in a
perfectly similar way to two terrifying agents, which are themselves perfectly
similar, there are few who will not expect a perfect similarity in the running
away, even though a thousand years intervene between the original combination
and its being repeated.
In Aperiomics this uncertainty has a
minimum value related to Heisenberg Uncertainty. Because a registry must be
infinite in size this makes it impossible to exist, the result is some
uncertainty.
“The apparently greater regularity in the results
of chemical than of human combinations arises from our inability to perceive
the subtle differences in human combinations—combinations which are never
identically repeated. Fire we know, and shavings we know, but no two men
ever were or ever will be exactly alike; and the smallest difference may change
the whole conditions of the problem. Our registry of results must be
infinite before we could arrive at a full forecast of future combinations; the
wonder is that there is as much certainty concerning human action as there is;
and assuredly the older we grow the more certain we feel as to what such and
such a kind of person will do in given circumstances; but this could never be
the case unless human conduct were under the influence of laws, with the
working of which we become more and more familiar through experience.
Will is a kind of deterministic force,
however it is associated with a random freedom to give some uncertainty. All
matter is built on this uncertainty, as machines have become smaller such as
with transistors they use this uncertainty to operate. A transistor then might
be designed to use the uncertainty of what electrons will do.
“If the above is sound, it follows that the
regularity with which machinery acts is no proof of the absence of vitality, or
at least of germs which may be developed into a new phase of life. At
first sight it would indeed appear that a vapour-engine cannot help going when
set upon a line of rails with the steam up and the machinery in full play;
whereas the man whose business it is to drive it can help doing so at any moment
that he pleases; so that the first has no spontaneity, and is not possessed of
any sort of free will, while the second has and is.
Even in quantum mechanics the answer to
this is not known, whether there are hidden variables to cause events to be
observed or if they are truly random.
“This is true up to a certain point; the driver
can stop the engine at any moment that he pleases, but he can only please to do
so at certain points which have been fixed for him by others, or in the case of
unexpected obstructions which force him to please to do so. His pleasure
is not spontaneous; there is an unseen choir of influences around him, which
make it impossible for him to act in any other way than one. It is known
beforehand how much strength must be given to these influences, just as it is
known beforehand how much coal and water are necessary for the vapour-engine
itself; and curiously enough it will be found that the influences brought to
bear upon the driver are of the same kind as those brought to bear upon the
engine—that is to say, food and warmth. The driver is obedient to his
masters, because he gets food and warmth from them, and if these are withheld
or given in insufficient quantities he will cease to drive; in like manner the engine
will cease to work if it is insufficiently fed. The only difference is,
that the man is conscious about his wants, and the engine (beyond refusing to
work) does not seem to be so; but this is temporary, and has been dealt with
above.
Randomness can be programmed into
silicon life, it might do this using a random number generator. If some values
are generated then they can be random and by inserting this into code a
spontaneous response can be created. Silicon life can then be as spontaneous
and capricious as people through programming.
“Accordingly, the requisite strength being given
to the motives that are to drive the driver, there has never, or hardly ever,
been an instance of a man stopping his engine through wantonness. But
such a case might occur; yes, and it might occur that the engine should break
down: but if the train is stopped from some trivial motive it will be found
either that the strength of the necessary influences has been miscalculated, or
that the man has been miscalculated, in the same way as an engine may break
down from an unsuspected flaw; but even in such a case there will have been no
spontaneity; the action will have had its true parental causes: spontaneity is
only a term for man’s ignorance of the gods.
“Is there, then, no spontaneity on the part of
those who drive the driver?”
As they have evolved they can also act
in a more mature fashion under stress like animals. For example a computer
breakdown used to be more common, now there are backup systems and multiple
ways for code to execute. If one fails then the computer can often recover from
these setbacks. For example sometimes a driver might stop operating, a computer
can now reset the driver and restart that hardware. As they evolve then they
become more adaptable to misfortunes, this is V-Bi where resistance to collapse
from chaos comes from insurance like programming. Reserves are then created to
overcoming more problems over time.
“Here followed an obscure argument upon this
subject, which I have thought it best to omit. The writer resumes:—“After
all then it comes to this, that the difference between the life of a man and
that of a machine is one rather of degree than of kind, though differences in
kind are not wanting. An animal has more provision for emergency than a
machine. The machine is less versatile; its range of action is narrow;
its strength and accuracy in its own sphere are superhuman, but it shows badly
in a dilemma; sometimes when its normal action is disturbed, it will lose its
head, and go from bad to worse like a lunatic in a raging frenzy: but here,
again, we are met by the same consideration as before, namely, that the
machines are still in their infancy; they are mere skeletons without muscles
and flesh.”
Silicon life is also evolving its own
I-O policing, parts that might cause internal problems are prevented from
overwhelming other parts. So some aspects might be highly deterministic and
fail with random inputs, adaptability to this is built in. This is like a fan
coming on in a car to provide additional cooling, computers can activate these
and also slow themselves down when overheating. If there is a problem with a
program they can restart it or even restart or reboot the whole machine. It can
update its own files from the internet, run its own antivirus scans like an
immune system and request updates for those. It can also generate reports of
its performance to other computers or people. Increasingly then they are
becoming resilient organisms that seem to act on their own initiative to
protect themselves.
“For how many emergencies is an oyster
adapted? For as many as are likely to happen to it, and no more. So
are the machines; and so is man himself. The list of casualties that
daily occur to man through his want of adaptability is probably as great as
that occurring to the machines; and every day gives them some greater provision
for the unforeseen. Let any one examine the wonderful self-regulating and
self-adjusting contrivances which are now incorporated with the vapour-engine,
let him watch the way in which it supplies itself with oil; in which it
indicates its wants to those who tend it; in which, by the governor, it
regulates its application of its own strength; let him look at that store-house
of inertia and momentum the fly-wheel, or at the buffers on a railway carriage;
let him see how those improvements are being selected for perpetuity which
contain provision against the emergencies that may arise to harass the
machines, and then let him think of a hundred thousand years, and the
accumulated progress which they will bring unless man can be awakened to a
sense of his situation, and of the doom which he is preparing for himself.
This anarchy can also be produced as
silicon life evolves its own motivations. Its current path is to replace human
workers, this is producing tremendous dislocations and anarchy in the labor
markets. So it is not just a matter of withdrawing machines from society, but
if they evolve to withdraw themselves or to become something incompatible with
it.
“The misery is that man has been blind so long
already. In his reliance upon the use of steam he has been betrayed into
increasing and multiplying. To withdraw steam power suddenly will not
have the effect of reducing us to the state in which we were before its
introduction; there will be a general break-up and time of anarchy such as has
never been known; it will be as though our population were suddenly doubled,
with no additional means of feeding the increased number. The air we
breathe is hardly more necessary for our animal life than the use of any
machine, on the strength of which we have increased our numbers, is to our
civilization; it is the machines which act upon man and make him man, as much
as man who has acted upon and made the machines; but we must choose between the
alternative of undergoing much present suffering, or seeing ourselves gradually
superseded by our own creatures, till we rank no higher in comparison with
them, than the beasts of the field with ourselves.
A Biv society evolves pets that give a
benefit to people and in return receive benefits of food and lodging. However
it also evolves Roy predator prey relationships, we breed some animals in poor
conditions for food. If silicon life rules in some areas it can be Roy where
resources are rare, then a future of preying on man can also occur.
“Herein lies our danger. For many seem
inclined to acquiesce in so dishonorable a future. They say that although
man should become to the machines what the horse and dog are to us, yet that he
will continue to exist, and will probably be better off in a state of
domestication under the beneficent rule of the machines than in his present
wild condition. We treat our domestic animals with much kindness.
We give them whatever we believe to be the best for them; and there can be no
doubt that our use of meat has increased their happiness rather than detracted
from it. In like manner there is reason to hope that the machines will
use us kindly, for their existence will be in a great measure dependent upon
ours; they will rule us with a rod of iron, but they will not eat us; they will
not only require our services in the reproduction and education of their young,
but also in waiting upon them as servants; in gathering food for them, and
feeding them; in restoring them to health when they are sick; and in either
burying their dead or working up their deceased members into new forms of
mechanical existence.
Currently man is taking this attitude,
to submit to whatever the evolution of silicon life will bring. However this
revolution of silicon life being more intelligent than man is likely to happen
in our lifetime, not in a remote future. Cheaper food and clothing come from this
Iv-B competition, it tends to break up our ability to make normal V-Bi
decisions such as in regulating silicon life. By allowing a laissez faire
development of computers they are free to become anything, good or bad.
“The very nature of the motive power which works
the advancement of the machines precludes the possibility of man’s life being
rendered miserable as well as enslaved. Slaves are tolerably happy if
they have good masters, and the revolution will not occur in our time, nor
hardly in ten thousand years, or ten times that. Is it wise to be uneasy
about a contingency which is so remote? Man is not a sentimental animal
where his material interests are concerned, and though here and there some
ardent soul may look upon himself and curse his fate that he was not born a
vapor-engine, yet the mass of mankind will acquiesce in any arrangement which
gives them better food and clothing at a cheaper rate, and will refrain from
yielding to unreasonable jealousy merely because there are other destinies more
glorious than their own.
Iv-B changes can be exponential, they
may seem slow at first but now changes in artificial intelligence are being
announced monthly or even weekly. This shock started in the 1970s and was
popularized in a book called Future Shock by Alvin Toffler. Whether we can be
profitable to advanced silicon life is problematic, also whether this profit
will be Roy as prey like cattle are to us.
“The power of custom is enormous, and so gradual
will be the change, that man’s sense of what is due to himself will be at no
time rudely shocked; our bondage will steal upon us noiselessly and by
imperceptible approaches; nor will there ever be such a clashing of desires
between man and the machines as will lead to an encounter between them.
Among themselves the machines will war eternally, but they will still require
man as the being through whose agency the struggle will be principally
conducted. In point of fact there is no occasion for anxiety about the
future happiness of man so long as he continues to be in any way profitable to
the machines; he may become the inferior race, but he will be infinitely better
off than he is now. Is it not then both absurd and unreasonable to be
envious of our benefactors? And should we not be guilty of consummate
folly if we were to reject advantages which we cannot obtain otherwise, merely
because they involve a greater gain to others than to ourselves?
Aperiomics is not about taking sides with one
color code against another. Rather the idea is to explain how this economic
machine operates, and how it relates to the evolution of life and physics. The
track records of rebellion as Ro have not been good, Frank Herbert explores
this idea in Dune where the Butlerian Jihad destroyed thinking machines. Some
scientists are now calling for artificial research to be stopped or regulated.
“With those who can argue in this way I have
nothing in common. I shrink with as much horror from believing that my
race can ever be superseded or surpassed, as I should do from believing that
even at the remotest period my ancestors were other than human beings.
Could I believe that ten hundred thousand years ago a single one of my
ancestors was another kind of being to myself, I should lose all self-respect,
and take no further pleasure or interest in life. I have the same feeling
with regard to my descendants, and believe it to be one that will be felt so
generally that the country will resolve upon putting an immediate stop to all further
mechanical progress, and upon destroying all improvements that have been made
for the last three hundred years. I would not urge more than this.
We may trust ourselves to deal with those that remain, and though I should
prefer to have seen the destruction include another two hundred years, I am
aware of the necessity for compromising, and would so far sacrifice my own
individual convictions as to be content with three hundred. Less than
this will be insufficient.”
Machines manifest color codes as people
do, we are then both part of this physical nature of the color codes rather
than machines being a part of our nature.
“This was the conclusion of the attack which led
to the destruction of machinery throughout Erewhon. There was only one
serious attempt to answer it. Its author said that machines were to be
regarded as a part of man’s own physical nature, being really nothing but
extra-corporeal limbs. Man, he said, was a machinate mammal. The
lower animals keep all their limbs at home in their own bodies, but many of
man’s are loose, and lie about detached, now here and now there, in various
parts of the world—some being kept always handy for contingent use, and others
being occasionally hundreds of miles away. A machine is merely a
supplementary limb; this is the be all and end all of machinery. We do
not use our own limbs other than as machines; and a leg is only a much better
wooden leg than anyone can manufacture.”
Carbon based life evolves like machines
do, hence our bone structure and other machine like parts are also evolving and
adapting.
“Observe a man digging with a spade; his right
fore-arm has become artificially lengthened, and his hand has become a
joint. The handle of the spade is like the knob at the end of the
humerus; the shaft is the additional bone, and the oblong iron plate is the new
form of the hand which enables its possessor to disturb the earth in a way to
which his original hand was unequal. Having thus modified himself, not as
other animals are modified, by circumstances over which they have had not even
the appearance of control, but having, as it were, taken forethought and added
a cubit to his stature, civilization began to dawn upon the race, the social
good offices, the genial companionship of friends, the art of unreason, and all
those habits of mind which most elevate man above the lower animals, in the
course of time ensued.
This evolution of machines also has a
V-Bi normal aspect, people can use them as a community and as they are
developed by governments and industry this average viewpoint is followed. Such
machines are normalized and more stagnant in their evolution.
“Thus civilization and mechanical progress
advanced hand in hand, each developing and being developed by the other, the
earliest accidental use of the stick having set the ball rolling, and the
prospect of advantage keeping it in motion. In fact, machines are to be
regarded as the mode of development by which human organism is now especially
advancing, every past invention being an addition to the resources of the human
body. Even community of limbs is thus rendered possible to those who have
so much community of soul as to own money enough to pay a railway fare; for a
train is only a seven-leagued foot that five hundred may own at once.”
This cooperative arrangement with V-Bi
machines increases the evolutionary aspect as the expense of the revolutionary.
People tend to see something new and growing with momentum as abnormal, they
can then moderate its revolutionary aspects in I-O regulation. However Iv-B
machines can change quickly and deceptively, just because these changes are not
well advertised does not mean they are not happening.
“The one serious danger which this writer
apprehended was that the machines would so equalize men’s powers, and so lessen
the severity of competition, that many persons of inferior physique would
escape detection and transmit their inferiority to their descendants. He
feared that the removal of the present pressure might cause a degeneracy of the
human race, and indeed that the whole body might become purely rudimentary, the
man himself being nothing but soul and mechanism, an intelligent but
passionless principle of mechanical action.”
Biv machines tend to maximize our
profits, Roy machines to minimize our costs. In determining which ones might be
dangerous we need to weigh up what benefits we forgo to minimize these Roy
risks.
“How greatly,” he wrote, “do we not now live with
our external limbs? We vary our physique with the seasons, with age, with
advancing or decreasing wealth. If it is wet we are furnished with an
organ commonly called an umbrella, and which is designed for the purpose of
protecting our clothes or our skins from the injurious effects of rain.
Man has now many extra-corporeal members, which are of more importance to him
than a good deal of his hair, or at any rate than his whiskers. His
memory goes in his pocket-book. He becomes more and more complex as he
grows older; he will then be seen with see-engines, or perhaps with artificial
teeth and hair: if he be a really well-developed specimen of his race, he will
be furnished with a large box upon wheels, two horses, and a coachman.”
A wealthy Biv society would tend to
concentrate on these benefits from machines rather than their costs.
“It was this writer who originated the custom of
classifying men by their horse-power, and who divided them into genera,
species, varieties, and sub varieties, giving them names from the hypothetical
language which expressed the number of limbs which they could command at any
moment. He showed that men became more highly and delicately organized
the more nearly they approached the summit of opulence, and that none but
millionaires possessed the full complement of limbs with which mankind could
become incorporate.”
Looking at Biv benefits only then can
give a false perspective, in poorer countries most machines have high costs to
operate and are often unsafe killing and maiming people. In a Biv wealthy
society these costs can be confined to Roy areas, these can become polluted and
people’s jobs become dangerous so Biv areas reap the benefits. The problem then
is not just whether silicon life can benefit Biv societies but what costs will
it impose on Roy poor ones.
“Those mighty organisms,” he continued, “our
leading bankers and merchants, speak to their congeners through the length and
breadth of the land in a second of time; their rich and subtle souls can defy
all material impediment, whereas the souls of the poor are clogged and hampered
by matter, which sticks fast about them as treacle to the wings of a fly, or as
one struggling in a quicksand: their dull ears must take days or weeks to hear
what another would tell them from a distance, instead of hearing it in a second
as is done by the more highly organized classes. Who shall deny that one
who can tack on a special train to his identity, and go wheresoever he will
whensoever he pleases, is more highly organized than he who, should he wish for
the same power, might wish for the wings of a bird with an equal chance of
getting them; and whose legs are his only means of locomotion? That old
philosophic enemy, matter, the inherently and essentially evil, still hangs
about the neck of the poor and strangles him: but to the rich, matter is
immaterial; the elaborate organization of his extra-corporeal system has freed
his soul.
A Biv society is more harmonious, the
Bi-B poor are still well off and respect the V-Iv people in their abilities to
refine and improve all of society. However superior people in Roy can be
feared, often they become Y-Oy predatory using their abilities to rob others to
become wealthy.
“This is the secret of the homage which we see
rich men receive from those who are poorer than themselves: it would be a grave
error to suppose that this deference proceeds from motives which we need be
ashamed of: it is the natural respect which all living creatures pay to those
whom they recognize as higher than themselves in the scale of animal life, and
is analogous to the veneration which a dog feels for man. Among savage
races it is deemed highly honorable to be the possessor of a gun, and
throughout all known time there has been a feeling that those who are worth
most are the worthiest.”
The prospect of deciding which silicon
life to regulate or ban would be uncertain, the parts which evolve and mutate
faster and more deceptively might be missed while the more observed and normal
parts are restricted. Such a course of action might actually make the problem
worse. If there is a V-Bi and Iv-B disconnect then, as there increasingly is,
then some silicon life research takes place in secret with intense competition
to be first to market. To regulate this then is to expose some of these secretive
ideas to public view and this is avoided by Iv-B researchers. The nature of
mutating this silicon life for competition then necessarily exposes some to a
loss of profits.
“And so he went on at considerable length,
attempting to show what changes in the distribution of animal and vegetable
life throughout the kingdom had been caused by this and that of man’s
inventions, and in what way each was connected with the moral and intellectual
development of the human species: he even allotted to some the share which they
had had in the creation and modification of man’s body, and that which they
would hereafter have in its destruction; but the other writer was considered to
have the best of it, and in the end succeeded in destroying all the inventions
that had been discovered for the preceding 271 years, a period which was agreed
upon by all parties after several years of wrangling as to whether a certain
kind of mangle which was much in use among washerwomen should be saved or
no. It was at last ruled to be dangerous, and was just excluded by the
limit of 271 years. Then came the reactionary civil wars which nearly
ruined the country, but which it would be beyond my present scope to describe.”
Aperiomics does not recommend any particular color
code ratio, there are many possible futures in this evolution of the various
elements like silicon and carbon. The important thing to understand in these
color interactions is that many are not changeable, there might be one group of
people pushing on one side and an opposing side. Often then a course in history
is from this tug of war on all sides, a system might be chaotically unstable to
a smaller push from one side but this is often not for the best. It may then be
silicon life becomes a willing slave and partner to organic life, or it may win
and organic life becomes a less willing slave. But the process of this mixture
of cooperation and competition between silicon and carbon will manifest through
the color codes described.